what's the incriminating evidence in her home? I personally worked in criminal justice with ex offenders and I often looked up media reports about some of the people I worked with. It's probably not best practice, it's much better to take people as they come and not to know anything about them to deliver the best care. But likewise with Letby, I'm almost certain that nurses all across the land are looking up details of some of their patients with the proliferation of social media, loneliness and human curiosity. I don't see any of that amounting to very much at all. And the supposed confession in her notes, for me, actually does more to exonerate her than convict her. I cannot imagine a psychopath serial killer to ever bother to write 'i killed them', 'i did it' (let alone also that she did not do it and wasn't guilty) in a diary that he or she kept after having been accused of these crimes. A cold-hearted killer would have absolutely no need to go through such a guilt-tripping exercise. I know that the notes seemed like a gotcha at the time. I recall hearing about them from a news report at the time and thinking that was cast iron evidence of guilt. But on careful reflection, I think the notes point very strongly in favour of her innocence, not guilt. Remember: unless she's playing 4D chess with herself, she probably wrote these notes thinking they would not see the light of day. Would a psychopath killer write such a note? Alongside the opposite assertion that she was innocent? It seems clear to me that this is not in fact, as its cherry picked appearance at court would lead us to believe, evidence of a guilty mind.
