We shall see, I think the inquiry painted a very different picture of the doctors. I think it’s genuinely a pity that they couldn’t see beyond their whispering and follow their own safeguarding protocols- but I also accept that this was to do with the fact they were barely ever on the ward- which circled back to how stretched they were to do ward rounds and attend meetings about serious incidents- which should have been raised by them through their own safeguarding protocols. They loved a good mutter privately about the state of the situation and their inability to attend meetings, but they were hardly being heroic men (and women) of action throughout this time.
I don't think you have a clear view of the actual situation. The doctors did have meetings and calls concerning the troubling collapses. And early on they became suspicious of Letby because she was so front and centre at all of the earliest incidents.
The doctors stated their suspicions through the proper protocol and were REJECTED by the administration. The nurses union then took over and they rebuffed the doctors at every turn. In fact, three of the doctors were threatened with suspension, penalties, or even firing, because of their stance against Letby. It was heroic, in my opinion, that they continued on with their efforts to get her off the floor of the clinic.
We suspect there may be foul play on the unit, whilst not pushing parents to get autopsies and inquiries into deaths.
That is untrue. There was only one doctor that did not suggest or push for an autopsy. All of the other babies in the trial had autopsies. And there was no reason to push for inquiries into the early deaths because it was not totally unheard of for a premature baby to die.
It wasn't until there was an upsurge AND the unusual symptoms and strange inability for them to respond to the usual treatments for collapse that they realised it was not a normal situation.
They saw dubious test results and x rays, but never followed them up to get confirmation or review them.
Again, you are incorrect. There were formal review meetings after every incident, and we saw the notes from them during the trial. The doctors and nurses attended these review meetings and discussed the test results, the x-rays and the other similar cases. It was during these meetings that suspicions arose.
Was there even a single DATIX form completed by a doctor in those few years? All questions asked of them in the inquiry whilst they floundered to justify why they didn’t do those things- and honestly the excuse of being suspicious of someone causing harm taking up all their time really doesn’t wash with me and it didn’t appear to be acceptable in the inquiry either.
I think if you followed the trial you would have seen the lengths that many of the doctors took to try and sound the alarm.
It is easy to 'flounder' on the heat sheet during a high profile inquiry. But the problem was that even though the doctors did express their suspicions and asked that Letby be given a desk job while investigations were done, they were admonished and threatened for making that request.
I imagine they did second guess themselves at times with that kind of response from their superiors.
But hey you have swung me back off the fence to accepting the guilty verdict- so maybe you can also convince me the doctors did their utmost for those babies on the unit.
I'll gladly take on that challenge. I will see what I can gather....