When your own barrister tells the jury that you are "undoubtedly guilty of something", you know it's not gone well!![]()
Sara Sharif’s father ‘in circles of hell but only stepmother knows how she died’
Defence lawyers were giving closing speeches in the trial of taxi driver Urfan Sharif, his wife Beinash Batool, and brother Faisal Malik.uk.news.yahoo.com
This is on the presumption that urfan was telling the truth that Sara was lying and dying on bienash's lap when he returned from work . And telling the truth is not urfans forte tbh .![]()
Sara Sharif’s father ‘in circles of hell but only stepmother knows how she died’
Defence lawyers were giving closing speeches in the trial of taxi driver Urfan Sharif, his wife Beinash Batool, and brother Faisal Malik.uk.news.yahoo.com
The problem is either way it is going to work in someones favour. The fact is though that whilst he was at work she could have called for an ambulance but did not do so.This is on the presumption that urfan was telling the truth that Sara was lying and dying on bienash's lap when he returned from work . And telling the truth is not urfans forte tbh .
I think there is way too much weight being allowed here on the allegation that Sara died in Beinash's lap .
And this imo may go in urfans favour as the jury may see it as Sara dying because bienash was the main instigator and perpetrator.
This very well may be true and I'm not out to defend Beinash in my mind she is the devil's bride but I certainly don't want a lie to work in urfans favour
The only truth in this case in my opinion was Sara suffered immense abuse and was killed in one way or another by the 3 defendants. Her dead body held the evidence and the trio chose not to be truthful in their accounts of how that evidence came about
It doesn't have to work in anyone's favour, surely?The problem is either way it is going to work in someones favour. The fact is though that whilst he was at work she could have called for an ambulance but did not do so.
it does because neither seem to be telling the truth in court as to what happened so the lies could well work out in someones favour.It doesn't have to work in anyone's favour, surely?
Or the jury could decide as many of us have, that this account doesn't seem plausible, and they may just as well think they are both equally guilty as far as anyone can tell.it does because neither seem to be telling the truth in court as to what happened so the lies could well work out in someones favour.
What evidence that linked him to the murder was probably destroyed with the doorbell and conveniently lost phones![]()
Sara Sharif’s father ‘in circles of hell but only stepmother knows how she died’
Defence lawyers were giving closing speeches in the trial of taxi driver Urfan Sharif, his wife Beinash Batool, and brother Faisal Malik.www.independent.co.uk
So Mr Ivers did say something -
'Michael Ivers KC, for the third defendant, told jurors: “What evidence links Faisal Malik to murder – nothing.”'
Yes, and he is probably ignoring the circumstantial evidence, anyway.What evidence that linked him to the murder was probably destroyed with the doorbell and conveniently lost phones
What evidence that linked him to the murder was probably destroyed with the doorbell and conveniently lost phones
Malik has stated he was required to distance himself from bienash . And she was required to cover up . ( she didn't cover up in car or airport so that's that lie blown apart kc micheal Ivers) he can put that in a pipe and smoke it hahaUncle living in this house of horrors
linked him to the murder of an innocent child.
IMO it is as clear as day
Oops!
I'm not a KC barrister.
Sometimes
at certain age it is better to live far away from family.
Like a student that he was
in students' dormitory.
JMO
Malik has stated he was required to distance himself from bienash . And she was required to cover up . ( she didn't cover up in car or airport so that's that lie blown apart kc micheal Ivers) he can put that in a pipe and smoke it haha
I imagine if true this was because in some Muslim families men and women sit separately. Many in different rooms . The menfolk in the living room . Womenfolk in kitchen or other quarters of a house . The idea behind this would be women are not to be exposed to talk of business affairs etc and the idea women would be talking about women's stuff . So if this tradition was followed in the house ,you can bet your life urfan "confided " in fasial what was happening with Sara.
![]()
Sara Sharif’s father ‘in circles of hell but only stepmother knows how she died’
Defence lawyers were giving closing speeches in the trial of taxi driver Urfan Sharif, his wife Beinash Batool, and brother Faisal Malik.www.independent.co.uk
So Mr Ivers did say something -
'Michael Ivers KC, for the third defendant, told jurors: “What evidence links Faisal Malik to murder – nothing.”'
I don't believe for a second that Sara was in anyone's lap in that house.This is on the presumption that urfan was telling the truth that Sara was lying and dying on bienash's lap when he returned from work . And telling the truth is not urfans forte tbh .
I think there is way too much weight being allowed here on the allegation that Sara died in Beinash's lap .
And this imo may go in urfans favour as the jury may see it as Sara dying because bienash was the main instigator and perpetrator.
This very well may be true and I'm not out to defend Beinash in my mind she is the devil's bride but I certainly don't want a lie to work in urfans favour
The only truth in this case in my opinion was Sara suffered immense abuse and was killed in one way or another by the 3 defendants. Her dead body held the evidence and the trio chose not to be truthful in their accounts of how that evidence came about
I doubt there was even room to separate each other in that house.Malik has stated he was required to distance himself from bienash . And she was required to cover up . ( she didn't cover up in car or airport so that's that lie blown apart kc micheal Ivers) he can put that in a pipe and smoke it haha
I imagine if true this was because in some Muslim families men and women sit separately. Many in different rooms . The menfolk in the living room . Womenfolk in kitchen or other quarters of a house . The idea behind this would be women are not to be exposed to talk of business affairs etc and the idea women would be talking about women's stuff . So if this tradition was followed in the house ,you can bet your life urfan "confided " in fasial what was happening with Sara.
Yet he chose to sit passively and silent,
while the prosecution accused him of murdering 10 year old child.
Was he seriously relying on his ‘’ brother to clear his good name?