UK UK - Suzy Lamplugh, 25, Fulham, 28 Jul 1986 #7

[greenwoodlad]

Who knows but this is the one only 20 at the time though 6’2” may have looked a little older has everything needed to be him so i would say sjl is either on or around wimbledon common or richmond park, he was not fussy and got quite brazen with rachel nickel in broad daylight you cannot argue with the photofit either just look at the mouth.

its certainly an interesting new theory ....as opposed to the JC theories.....

 

[greenwoodlad]

in 1986 getting a conditional discharge for being found to carry a loaded gun, probably the one to take control of sjl.and the mouth of the photofit is spot on to a t.

Photofit? are you suggesting he is Mr Kipper? therefore 37SR viewing did happen ?

 

[Ljh21]

Photofit? are you suggesting he is Mr Kipper? therefore 37SR viewing did happen ?

Well i think the likeness of the mouth speaks volumes

 

[Ljh21]

Well i think the likeness of the mouth speaks volumes

I find it undeniable and the kipper- napper coupled with sjl dyslexia could well account for the name

 

[Ljh21]

Well i think the likeness of the mouth speaks volumes

I find it undeniable and the kipper- napper coupled with sjl dyslexia could well account for the name if only sjl had written napper

 

[greenwoodlad]

I find it undeniable and the kipper- napper coupled with sjl dyslexia could well account for the name if only sjl had written napper

going with this theory - how do you think the fiesta ended up dumped in Stevenage Rd?

 

[Ljh21]

Knowing his mo he probably stalked her to that location and to her work

I wrote him off before as being young and his area of criminality was a few miles east but delving into his character it is undeniable and with the rachel nickell / wimbledon common incident there are a lot of pointers so to say

 

[Ljh21]

going with this theory - how do you think the fiesta ended up dumped in Stevenage Rd?

He knew the wimbledon common area like the back of his hand, with leaving the car over the thames he is creating a distance between the two, if he drove and knowing that he stalked victims probably parked nearby that morning (if he drove) he was known to cycle around the wimbledon common area. It is hard to think through the abduction scenario i will think about that

 

[tes1984]

I wrote him off before as being young and his area of criminality was a few miles east but delving into his character it is undeniable and with the rachel nickell / wimbledon common incident there are a lot of pointers so to say

The police think RN only started offending in SW London in the 90s, when he felt the heat of investigations near to his home.

He does tick a few boxes, but I think you're underestimating the sheer number of rapists/kidnappers/murderers with far stronger links to Suzy/Fulham/Putney.

I also think RN fails to tick a lot of boxes. I can't see how he makes a body disappear. He made no efforts to hide his known murder victims.

 

[Ljh21]

Totally agree with you - the fact that it was abandoned outside a sturgis property was massively significant ....the black left have drive BMW that a jogger witnessed with the woman screaming or laughing ( woman blowing the horn) was also seen in Stevenage RD NR BISHOPS PARK - surely this cant be coincidence! and the van driver that was nearly hit by a white fiesta driving at high speed and all over the rd ..really - are all these coincidences ?

Do you have a time of the van drivers sighting as i am trying to picture nappers thought pattern
1 - we could say 37 shorrolds happened if we believe the napper/ neighbour photofit
2 - if we believe the car was left at 123sr then napper may have said “i noticed you had a property on stevenage road” followed sjl there
3 - i will have to think of the next bit lol

 

[tes1984]

He knew the wimbledon common area like the back of his hand, with leaving the car over the thames he is creating a distance between the two, if he drove and knowing that he stalked victims probably parked nearby that morning (if he drove) he was known to cycle around the wimbledon common area. It is hard to think through the abduction scenario i will think about that

I don't think he could drive a car. I might be wrong though.

 

[Cherwell]

He does tick a few boxes, but I think you're underestimating the sheer number of rapists/kidnappers/murderers with far stronger links to Suzy/Fulham/Putney.

And if this was a personal thing, it might have been someone with no form at all.

 

[Ljh21]

And if this was a personal thing, it might have been someone with no form at all.

I did think of the railway killers but they were not exactly the two brightest murderers

 

[Cherwell]

I did think of the railway killers but they were not exactly the two brightest murderers

They're not exactly people with no form either.

Did you mean to quote my post? You know there's a dedicated reply box at the bottom of the page? You should use that if you are not replying directly to a post. It is confusing when you keep quoting posts, including your own.
Use the reply box.

 

[tes1984]

I did think of the railway killers but they were not exactly the two brightest murderers

Mulchahy was IMO quite smart and manipulative. He got away with his crimes for a long time. He was questioned loads of times by the police but they couldn't ever charge him.

 

[Ljh21]

going with this theory - how do you think the fiesta ended up dumped in Stevenage Rd?

Just thought, maybe he asked to see langthornethen went back to car taken Under duress i would imagine knife when returning the car that explains handbrake off obviously lack of drving experience was had maybe left his bike nearby

 

[Ljh21]

The police think RN only started offending in SW London in the 90s, when he felt the heat of investigations near to his home.

He does tick a few boxes, but I think you're underestimating the sheer number of rapists/kidnappers/murderers with far stronger links to Suzy/Fulham/Putney.

I also think RN fails to tick a lot of boxes. I can't see how he makes a body disappear. He made no efforts to hide his known murder victims.

Do you have a top ten so to speak of strong suspects?

 

[Ljh21]

Do you have a top ten so to speak of strong suspects?

I will think on that one, that is why the railway killers came to mind as they had attempted to weight down victims in the past and there were two of them, unless one followed the other in their own car of use.

 

[greenwoodlad]

I will think on that one, that is why the railway killers came to mind as they had attempted to weight down victims in the past and there were two of them, unless one followed the other in their own car of use.

I don't think the Railway Killers were involved ....wheres the Railway connection ? plus most of the bodies were left / semi destroyed ...were found - SJL has never been found , I agree a body was dumped in a canal but ...they just don't fit the SJL disappearance IMO

 

[greenwoodlad]

I feel SJL went to meet someone that she knew or had a connection with/agreed to meet - something happened then - I don't think it was someone not known to her or at least the initial meeting was with someone she knew of