• #721
He could have met and befriended vv who knows, it eould not surprise me.

That is the critical question, to which we'll never know the answer. The police never found that car.

A LHD BMW would be cheaper than a RHD BMW generally speaking.
Yes, good point on price. I found a local company selling these in 86.

The Crimewatch prog - later one - or a doc - shows the jogger witness saying “it never occurred to me it was a LHD BMW”. So this possibility fed to him & it made sense as he couldn’t understand why the ‘driver’ was screaming or laughing/moving etc.

I need to check article again but he remarked again on the woman being much blonder than he thought SL was.
 
  • #722
on the sunday SL called at her parents. i thought DL said SL was tired after her weekend. DL says i hope your not over doing things, to which SL says, no mum, life is for living. they did not mention anything about property deal.
This is what was put out there by DL - a sanitised version. This is why the police were ‘furious’ they’d not been given all the correct information at time.

She discussed with them ‘at length’ & had told her uncle (in doc) he says that someone was ‘leaning on her’ ‘ may be linked. The family knew all about the deal & contract & it formed part of last conversation they had with her. They knew it was problematic, poss slightly illegal & there were ‘strings’.

I think it’s possible her sensible father cast some doubt for SL & she therefore backed out & things escalated. She’d told her uncle breezily ‘don’t worry I can handle it’. Sadly perhaps she couldn’t.

NB: the two articles I’ve posted upthread.

I think DL thought this could all be solved without any or too much scrutiny into more difficult aspects of SL’s private & professional life. Their changing some facts to make them a bit more palatable is sadly one reason IMO & from evidence that it remained unsolved.
 
  • #723
That is the critical question, to which we'll never know the answer. The police never found that car.

A LHD BMW would be cheaper than a RHD BMW generally speaking.
Ah, but they did find Cannan's BMW car when they searched his flat in Bristol, along with Shirley Banks resprayed mini tha was concealed in the garage.

So if that car wasn't a left hand drive, then it has to be a different BMW vehicle allegedly seen by the jogger who left the park.

Not finding the BMW in Stevenage road isn't the relevant point, it's whether or not the BMW owned by Cannan was a left or right hand drive.
 
  • #724
They allowed her time off to get her hair done and she was going for lunch that Monday with PSS until the latter cancelled. So this does not follow. It could simply be what she told her mother to avoid having lunch with her.

Agree with this.

Too much is made of timings (lunch at 1, collecting belongings at 6, etc), when this isn’t how office environments work, especially not an estate agency. I don’t think for a second MG would’ve allowed Suzy to simply go shopping during business hours, but popping into John Menzies or getting your tennis racquet restrung or even doing a bit of window shopping after an appointment? There’s nothing or no one to stop you. An appointment might take you out of the office for ten minutes, or you might be gone for an hour and half. You’ll have cancellations and no shows. So plenty of scope for doing other things. I think we’d all prefer to get an errand or meeting that we’d have to do in our own time - during one of the busiest periods of the day traffic wise and with your own schedule looking quite tight - out of the way on company time, if we could get away with it. It’s really not at all a fanciful part of any theory relating to this case, imo.
 
  • #725
I think Cannan may have chosen Foye House, Leigh Woods, in Bristol, because it was a just a stone's throw from the location where another murder victim from 1984; Shelley Morgan, was alleged to have gone to and from where she was abducted and murdered; her remains later being found in Backwell.

Cannan was in prison at the time of Shelley's murder, but it may be that Cannan deliberately wanted to get a flat close the site where another killer had previously operated.

That's just my opinion of course.
 
  • #726
Ah, but they did find Cannan's BMW car when they searched his flat in Bristol, along with Shirley Banks resprayed mini tha was concealed in the garage.

So if that car wasn't a left hand drive, then it has to be a different BMW vehicle allegedly seen by the jogger who left the park.

Not finding the BMW in Stevenage road isn't the relevant point, it's whether or not the BMW owned by Cannan was a left or right hand drive.
JC’s only known BMW - RHD - was bought circa June 1987 from Roger Head motors in Gloucester. Around time he rented Foye House in Bristol. Other than that no proven link to a BMW. He had use of a red Sierra in mid 1986 that he shared with hostel cook.
 
  • #727
Agree with this.

Too much is made of timings (lunch at 1, collecting belongings at 6, etc), when this isn’t how office environments work, especially not an estate agency. I don’t think for a second MG would’ve allowed Suzy to simply go shopping during business hours, but popping into John Menzies or getting your tennis racquet restrung or even doing a bit of window shopping after an appointment? There’s nothing or no one to stop you. An appointment might take you out of the office for ten minutes, or you might be gone for an hour and half. You’ll have cancellations and no shows. So plenty of scope for doing other things. I think we’d all prefer to get an errand or meeting that we’d have to do in our own time - during one of the busiest periods of the day traffic wise and with your own schedule looking quite tight - out of the way on company time, if we could get away with it. It’s really not at all a fanciful part of any theory relating to this case, imo.
This makes perfect sense. Some E Agency bosses could enjoy a bit of power & point at watches if 5 mins late on lunch & poss AS saying so here re: his comment Sturgis could be a bit tricky on timing. As you say though no one could really truly police your time.

The only caveat to this is the significance or otherwise of day in question - were all more wary due to big boss a stone’s throw from office? You’d likely be a bit more ‘by the book’ - a fee earner needing to be present & they were short staffed etc.

In which case leaving your bag poss an artful way of making it look like you expected only to be out briefly but in reality you were going to push it a bit. Some insurance.
 
  • #728
Ah, but they did find Cannan's BMW car when they searched his flat in Bristol, along with Shirley Banks resprayed mini tha was concealed in the garage.

So if that car wasn't a left hand drive, then it has to be a different BMW vehicle allegedly seen by the jogger who left the park.

Not finding the BMW in Stevenage road isn't the relevant point, it's whether or not the BMW owned by Cannan was a left or right hand drive.
Cannan was still using that car when he was nicked, so the connection was easily made.

The thing is, as LSW has noted, there's no evidence he was using a BMW at all in July 1986. JD has asserted that he is "personally confident that Cannan had access to a BMW" at that time. Whatever weight you attach to that, it's only relevant if you assume Cannan was the driver of the BMW that the jogger saw. If so, then you need to make the evidence fit the hypothesis by showing he had a BMW. And suddenly JD is convinced he had a BMW.

My concern is that had someone looking like SJL screaming / laughing been seen in the Noddy car, JC would have been fitted up with having owned one of those instead. His supposed 1986 BMW was registered to someone somewhere - why was it never identified if it existed?
 
  • #729
I have a few random questions that I feel would be interesting to find an answer to...

1) Suzy drove the white Fiesta to work, but she didn't use the vehicle again until after she left the office circa 12.30pm. When the vehicle was found in Stevenage road, it was said that the driver's seat was set further back; as though someone taller had driven it last. But was there any of Suzy's male colleagues who used the same car between the time she arrived at work, to the time she left circa 12.30pm? i.e. were there any other drivers of the Fiesta on that day apart from Suzy?

2) What happened to the large sheeting that was in the back of the Fiesta just behind the driver's seat and in front of Suzy's hat? In various different images/footage of the car in situ, there is at least one where a large piece of paper sheeting can be seen through the back window. It looks like a large map that has been unravelled. Where did that go and was it retained for evidence?
(It kind of reminds me a little of the interior of Penny Bell's Jaguar car; who was murdered in Greenford in 1991; a well dressed man in a suit being the prime suspect for her brutal murder)

3) If Suzy had lost her personal belongings that included her cheque book, then why didn't she take the 2 minute walk from her flat in Disraeli road to the pub on the other side of the trainline, to pick them up before work?
It strongly implies that Suzy didn't know where her belongings were until AFTER she got to the office on the morning of the 28th July.

4) Between 2pm and 3.30pm, there were apparently no witnesses to confirm that the Fiesta was still in Stevenage Road. Could the car have been RE-PARKED by the killer in virtually the same spot as it was seen earlier?
I say this because it was stated that the back of the car was encroaching slightly on the entrance to the garage, but the actual video footage that shows the vehicle in situ, clearly shows that the Fiesta is further forward and does NOT encroach the driveway at all.

5) When the witness came forward and said that a car similar to Suzy's, who driver was driving erratically and had almost drove into him in Kelvedon Road (as he drove north), and he looked in his mirror to see the car signal to turn right into the Fulham Road, then how did the car (if it was Suzy) manage to therefore drive directly towards the Sturgis office further up Fulham Road, without anyone seeing Suzy or the car? If the witness was correct, then Suzy was heading back towards the Sturgis office.

6) If Suzy's car was found with just the driver's door unlocked, but the passenger door locked, then how did both Suzy and the man with her both get out of the car?
Suzy's friend Barbara was adamant she saw Suzy driving circa 2.45pm up Fulham Palace Road, but there being a man in the passenger seat. This means that at some point they both needed to have got out of the car, but this conflicts with the logistics of how the car was found in Stevenage Road.
Why is that?
(unless there were 2 Fiesta company cars?)

7) There were alleged reports that there had been a man going around various estate agents, and calling himself Mr Kipper. But if this was John Cannan, then when did he find the time to do this? He was released on the Friday 25th, and the 27th was a Sunday. That means that the only day that Cannan could have gone around multiple estate agents, would have been on the Saturday only. Is that plausible?

8) If Suzy parked the car in Stevenage Road before going to 37SR to meet Mr Kipper, then how did she manage to do so in such a short time frame on foot? If she drove to Stevenage road first, then she must have got a lift to 37SR in order to be seen standing outside number 37 just a few minutes later. In other words, why not drive straight to 37SR from the office?

9) How did Mr Kipper know to go to 37SR? Sturgis never publicised the number of the house they advertised in the press, and if you check all the newspaper adds, they are deliberately ambiguous. The only place that they advertised the actual house number, was on the frontage of the Sturgis office. That means that unless Suzy verbally told Mr Kipper to meet outside 37SR, then Mr Kipper had to have been present at the office itself in order to see the actual advertisement for the correct flat. In other words, Mr Kipper didn't get the house number from a newspaper, so how did he know about 37SR?

10) Why is there so much mystery and contradiction surrounding the alleged 6pm timing for Suzy to go and collect her lost personal belongings at the pub, when she had arguably her most important deal with a 6pm appointment with Joanna Wright at 43 Waldermar avenue?

11) Did Mr Kipper ask Suzy to go and look at further properties, including 123 Stevenage road, which was also for sale through Sturgis?

12) Is it significant that Suzy's company car was parked outside 123 Stevenage Road, and her last appointment in Waldermar Avenue, was located between Stevenage Road and the Sturgis office?

13) Why did it appear that Suzy's boss was hiding something when he gave an interview on camera during the Crimewatch reconstruction? This is evidenced by his body language, micro expressions and licking of the lips at the end of him talking. He portrays a degree of nervousness, with a pinch of self gratification.

14) Who is the tanned man seen on one of the Lamplugh's family photos, who closely resembles the description of Mr Kipper? He is seen wearing a blue shirt with a woman who is presumably Suzy. They're seemingly sitting in a pub. Who is this man?

15) Who placed Suzy's hat back on the rear of the car window? She was seen wearing it by Marianna in Stevenage Road, but why is there no sign of this hat, or the car, when Suzy is apparently seen outside 37SR?

16) Was the canal in Brentford searched thoroughly by the police after a witness claimed to have seen a man; who he was later convinced was Cannan, walking with a heavy suitcase along the canal path?

17) Where did Suzy go to use the bathroom between leaving the office, and being allegedly seen by various witnesses over the next few hours?

18) Did Suzy ever enter 37SR, or was the witness mistaken?

19) Did the bearded man who hailed a cab and who told the cab driver he had heard a man and woman arguing, ever come forward? If not, then why not?

20) How did the killer leave with Suzy? If the alleged sighting of the BMW is wrong, then how did Suzy leave the area? It couldn't have been via her own car.

21) Did the killer have a bolt hole somewhere and subdue Suzy in a property local to the area, and the idea that Suzy was driven away, is completely wrong?

22) Does the BMW sighting provide us with the answer as to exactly how Suzy was abducted?
 
  • #730
I have a few random questions that I feel would be interesting to find an answer to...

1) Suzy drove the white Fiesta to work, but she didn't use the vehicle again until after she left the office circa 12.30pm. When the vehicle was found in Stevenage road, it was said that the driver's seat was set further back; as though someone taller had driven it last. But was there any of Suzy's male colleagues who used the same car between the time she arrived at work, to the time she left circa 12.30pm? i.e. were there any other drivers of the Fiesta on that day apart from Suzy?

2) What happened to the large sheeting that was in the back of the Fiesta just behind the driver's seat and in front of Suzy's hat? In various different images/footage of the car in situ, there is at least one where a large piece of paper sheeting can be seen through the back window. It looks like a large map that has been unravelled. Where did that go and was it retained for evidence?
(It kind of reminds me a little of the interior of Penny Bell's Jaguar car; who was murdered in Greenford in 1991; a well dressed man in a suit being the prime suspect for her brutal murder)

3) If Suzy had lost her personal belongings that included her cheque book, then why didn't she take the 2 minute walk from her flat in Disraeli road to the pub on the other side of the trainline, to pick them up before work?
It strongly implies that Suzy didn't know where her belongings were until AFTER she got to the office on the morning of the 28th July.

4) Between 2pm and 3.30pm, there were apparently no witnesses to confirm that the Fiesta was still in Stevenage Road. Could the car have been RE-PARKED by the killer in virtually the same spot as it was seen earlier?
I say this because it was stated that the back of the car was encroaching slightly on the entrance to the garage, but the actual video footage that shows the vehicle in situ, clearly shows that the Fiesta is further forward and does NOT encroach the driveway at all.

5) When the witness came forward and said that a car similar to Suzy's, who driver was driving erratically and had almost drove into him in Kelvedon Road (as he drove north), and he looked in his mirror to see the car signal to turn right into the Fulham Road, then how did the car (if it was Suzy) manage to therefore drive directly towards the Sturgis office further up Fulham Road, without anyone seeing Suzy or the car? If the witness was correct, then Suzy was heading back towards the Sturgis office.

6) If Suzy's car was found with just the driver's door unlocked, but the passenger door locked, then how did both Suzy and the man with her both get out of the car?
Suzy's friend Barbara was adamant she saw Suzy driving circa 2.45pm up Fulham Palace Road, but there being a man in the passenger seat. This means that at some point they both needed to have got out of the car, but this conflicts with the logistics of how the car was found in Stevenage Road.
Why is that?
(unless there were 2 Fiesta company cars?)

7) There were alleged reports that there had been a man going around various estate agents, and calling himself Mr Kipper. But if this was John Cannan, then when did he find the time to do this? He was released on the Friday 25th, and the 27th was a Sunday. That means that the only day that Cannan could have gone around multiple estate agents, would have been on the Saturday only. Is that plausible?

8) If Suzy parked the car in Stevenage Road before going to 37SR to meet Mr Kipper, then how did she manage to do so in such a short time frame on foot? If she drove to Stevenage road first, then she must have got a lift to 37SR in order to be seen standing outside number 37 just a few minutes later. In other words, why not drive straight to 37SR from the office?

9) How did Mr Kipper know to go to 37SR? Sturgis never publicised the number of the house they advertised in the press, and if you check all the newspaper adds, they are deliberately ambiguous. The only place that they advertised the actual house number, was on the frontage of the Sturgis office. That means that unless Suzy verbally told Mr Kipper to meet outside 37SR, then Mr Kipper had to have been present at the office itself in order to see the actual advertisement for the correct flat. In other words, Mr Kipper didn't get the house number from a newspaper, so how did he know about 37SR?

10) Why is there so much mystery and contradiction surrounding the alleged 6pm timing for Suzy to go and collect her lost personal belongings at the pub, when she had arguably her most important deal with a 6pm appointment with Joanna Wright at 43 Waldermar avenue?

11) Did Mr Kipper ask Suzy to go and look at further properties, including 123 Stevenage road, which was also for sale through Sturgis?

12) Is it significant that Suzy's company car was parked outside 123 Stevenage Road, and her last appointment in Waldermar Avenue, was located between Stevenage Road and the Sturgis office?

13) Why did it appear that Suzy's boss was hiding something when he gave an interview on camera during the Crimewatch reconstruction? This is evidenced by his body language, micro expressions and licking of the lips at the end of him talking. He portrays a degree of nervousness, with a pinch of self gratification.

14) Who is the tanned man seen on one of the Lamplugh's family photos, who closely resembles the description of Mr Kipper? He is seen wearing a blue shirt with a woman who is presumably Suzy. They're seemingly sitting in a pub. Who is this man?

15) Who placed Suzy's hat back on the rear of the car window? She was seen wearing it by Marianna in Stevenage Road, but why is there no sign of this hat, or the car, when Suzy is apparently seen outside 37SR?

16) Was the canal in Brentford searched thoroughly by the police after a witness claimed to have seen a man; who he was later convinced was Cannan, walking with a heavy suitcase along the canal path?

17) Where did Suzy go to use the bathroom between leaving the office, and being allegedly seen by various witnesses over the next few hours?

18) Did Suzy ever enter 37SR, or was the witness mistaken?

19) Did the bearded man who hailed a cab and who told the cab driver he had heard a man and woman arguing, ever come forward? If not, then why not?

20) How did the killer leave with Suzy? If the alleged sighting of the BMW is wrong, then how did Suzy leave the area? It couldn't have been via her own car.

21) Did the killer have a bolt hole somewhere and subdue Suzy in a property local to the area, and the idea that Suzy was driven away, is completely wrong?

22) Does the BMW sighting provide us with the answer as to exactly how Suzy was abducted?
great questions. i would love to know the answer to all these.
 
  • #731
Another excellent post. I wrote about the NDs back in the summer, I don’t find their sightings particularly compelling tbh. And HR describing Kiper as ‘boyishly’ handsome (!) on top of his apparent embellishments about what he saw should make us question his entire testimony, imo.

the whole point of a reconstruction is to jog people memory.
 
  • #732
She had an appointment at 6pm so no way she would arrange to pick up at 6pm the diary does not lie so the pow does or someone has made a mistake with the pick up time
after 6pm on the way home.
 
  • #733
This is what was put out there by DL - a sanitised version. This is why the police were ‘furious’ they’d not been given all the correct information at time.

She discussed with them ‘at length’ & had told her uncle (in doc) he says that someone was ‘leaning on her’ ‘ may be linked. The family knew all about the deal & contract & it formed part of last conversation they had with her. They knew it was problematic, poss slightly illegal & there were ‘strings’.

I think it’s possible her sensible father cast some doubt for SL & she therefore backed out & things escalated. She’d told her uncle breezily ‘don’t worry I can handle it’. Sadly perhaps she couldn’t.

NB: the two articles I’ve posted upthread.

I think DL thought this could all be solved without any or too much scrutiny into more difficult aspects of SL’s private & professional life. Their changing some facts to make them a bit more palatable is sadly one reason IMO & from evidence that it remained unsolved.
DL has mentioned SL making the, life is for living comment many times.
 
  • #734
the whole point of a reconstruction is to jog people memory.

In theory, yes. In practice we’ve ample evidence that memories can be shaped and influenced over time, including by the media we consume.

Memory researcher Elizabeth Loftus has demonstrated through her research that it is possible to induce false memories through suggestion. She has also shown that these memories can become stronger and more vivid as time goes on.

Over time, memories become distorted and begin to change. In some cases, the original memory may be changed in order to incorporate new information or experiences.

Some interesting stuff here:

 
  • #735
DL has mentioned SL making the, life is for living comment many times.
Of course - she said this & no one disputes.

It’s SL’s legacy & a characteristically positive spin from DL, but SL’s last words to parents also about the flat/deal “I’ll tell you more when it’s all settled”. It was a problematic deal & the family didn’t tell the police about it at time & the police were ‘furious’. That really speaks absolute volumes. It’s more about what DL didn’t say. Maybe SL was taking s risk, well she definitely was on this deal but don’t worry Mum “life is for living”’after all!

We now know from Barley in recent podcast SL likely went to see someone after her parents. It might not have been a romantic assignation it might have been related to the deal - maybe her parents had planted a seed of doubt?

The police didn’t know about SL’s deal in golden hour etc they’d not been given all the information to solve the crime. They were very angry & it’s all on the record.
 
Last edited:
  • #736
Cannan was still using that car when he was nicked, so the connection was easily made.

The thing is, as LSW has noted, there's no evidence he was using a BMW at all in July 1986. JD has asserted that he is "personally confident that Cannan had access to a BMW" at that time. Whatever weight you attach to that, it's only relevant if you assume Cannan was the driver of the BMW that the jogger saw. If so, then you need to make the evidence fit the hypothesis by showing he had a BMW. And suddenly JD is convinced he had a BMW.

My concern is that had someone looking like SJL screaming / laughing been seen in the Noddy car, JC would have been fitted up with having owned one of those instead. His supposed 1986 BMW was registered to someone somewhere - why was it never identified if it existed?
So many assume JC’s basic model BMW purchased in June 1987 was the 1986 one he used to abduct SL - one & the same.
 
  • #737
I have a few random questions that I feel would be interesting to find an answer to...

1) Suzy drove the white Fiesta to work, but she didn't use the vehicle again until after she left the office circa 12.30pm. When the vehicle was found in Stevenage road, it was said that the driver's seat was set further back; as though someone taller had driven it last. But was there any of Suzy's male colleagues who used the same car between the time she arrived at work, to the time she left circa 12.30pm? i.e. were there any other drivers of the Fiesta on that day apart from Suzy?
James Calvert, the officer junior, used it. He was about the same height as SJL.
2) What happened to the large sheeting that was in the back of the Fiesta just behind the driver's seat and in front of Suzy's hat?
Presumably placed there by the police while fingerprinting. Nobody else mentions it.
3) If Suzy had lost her personal belongings that included her cheque book, then why didn't she take the 2 minute walk from her flat in Disraeli road to the pub on the other side of the trainline, to pick them up before work?
The pub would not have been open. KH rang the bank that morning, the bank rang her and she rang the pub. Until that point she didn't know where the stuff was.
4) Between 2pm and 3.30pm, there were apparently no witnesses to confirm that the Fiesta was still in Stevenage Road. Could the car have been RE-PARKED by the killer in virtually the same spot as it was seen earlier?
Yes, or the earlier sighting was of a similar but different car. The Fiesta was the UK's best selling car and white was among the commoner colours. A schoolboy claimed to have seen the car at 12 noon, at which time SJL was in the office. This argues for two different cars.
5) When the witness came forward and said that a car similar to Suzy's, who driver was driving erratically and had almost drove into him in Kelvedon Road
I've a feeling this witness came forward 14 years later and thus has no idea what happened on 28/7/86.
6) If Suzy's car was found with just the driver's door unlocked, but the passenger door locked, then how did both Suzy and the man with her both get out of the car?
Good question. AS notes it was very difficult. For my money the driver got out and there was at that point no passenger. Someone returned to the car later to remove evidence.
7) There were alleged reports that there had been a man going around various estate agents, and calling himself Mr Kipper. But if this was John Cannan, then when did he find the time to do this?
He was on day release since January, had weekends off and the curfew was slack. It is very odd, though, that if this was true, we were never shown a sketch of these other Kipper sightings taken from other estate agency staff. Unless none ever met him.
8) If Suzy parked the car in Stevenage Road before going to 37SR to meet Mr Kipper, then how did she manage to do so in such a short time frame on foot?
Summarises the whole problem with the sightings. You have to decide whether HR is more reliable than WJ.
9) How did Mr Kipper know to go to 37SR?
She must have spoken to him that morning, or the previous evening, if that was where she was the previous night.
10) Why is there so much mystery and contradiction surrounding the alleged 6pm timing for Suzy to go and collect her lost personal belongings at the pub, when she had arguably her most important deal with a 6pm appointment with Joanna Wright at 43 Waldermar avenue?
The viewing at 6pm would have been a priority, and it was a timed appointment. It was already in her diary when she left at 12.40. She would thus not have told the PoW she would be there at 6pm because she knew she had to be elsewhere. She might have said after 6pm or she might have changed the time and gone there at 12.45, instead of going to 37SR (this is DV's hypothesis).

If anyone at the PoW had something to do with her disappearance, and if she went there at 12.45, the simplest answer to "did she ever turn up?" was "no, she wasn't expected till 6". In 1986, not having seen the diary all over the papers, that would seem logical, but by 1987, a bad actor at the PoW would know no such appointment was possible and that some other arrangement must have been made. This may explain why a year on, other calls about her to the pub were mentioned. Other explanations are possible.
11) Did Mr Kipper ask Suzy to go and look at further properties, including 123 Stevenage road, which was also for sale through Sturgis?
We don't know.
12) Is it significant that Suzy's company car was parked outside 123 Stevenage Road, and her last appointment in Waldermar Avenue, was located between Stevenage Road and the Sturgis office?
Probably not. All her appointments would have been within a mile or so. Anywhere could look fishily close to somewhere else.
13) Why did it appear that Suzy's boss was hiding something when he gave an interview on camera during the Crimewatch reconstruction?
Nervous at being on TV? I just thought he looked like the Kipper sketch - dark-haired late-20s yuppie in a suit.
14) Who is the tanned man seen on one of the Lamplugh's family photos, who closely resembles the description of Mr Kipper?
That's at the 21st on Saturday, and reputedly who SJL replaced AL with while the latter was on holiday.
15) Who placed Suzy's hat back on the rear of the car window? She was seen wearing it by Marianna in Stevenage Road, but why is there no sign of this hat, or the car, when Suzy is apparently seen outside 37SR?
We don't know.
16) Was the canal in Brentford searched thoroughly by the police after a witness claimed to have seen a man; who he was later convinced was Cannan, walking with a heavy suitcase along the canal path?
No, it's occasionally dredged and they figured that was enough. Some find the canal witness unpersuasive.
17) Where did Suzy go to use the bathroom between leaving the office, and being allegedly seen by various witnesses over the next few hours?
We don't know.
18) Did Suzy ever enter 37SR, or was the witness mistaken?
The police said nobody had been inside that day. Witness error. It's why the keys don't really matter. She never went in.
19) Did the bearded man who hailed a cab and who told the cab driver he had heard a man and woman arguing, ever come forward? If not, then why not?
He did not. Maybe he had no business being there at that time. Maybe he was "CV" dumping the car and planting a false trail. Maybe he didn't read newspapers or watch TV...
20) How did the killer leave with Suzy? If the alleged sighting of the BMW is wrong, then how did Suzy leave the area? It couldn't have been via her own car.
We don't know.
21) Did the killer have a bolt hole somewhere and subdue Suzy in a property local to the area, and the idea that Suzy was driven away, is completely wrong?
Possible. JC was mates with a lag who had a council flat nearby. The block had garages so he may have one of those too.
22) Does the BMW sighting provide us with the answer as to exactly how Suzy was abducted?
No, because we don't know how she was forced out of one car, into another and then to some house or other place and killed there.
 
  • #738
I think DL thought this could all be solved without any or too much scrutiny into more difficult aspects of SL’s private & professional life. Their changing some facts to make them a bit more palatable is sadly one reason IMO & from evidence that it remained unsolved.

Agreed. I’ve thought this for a very long time. DL while well intentioned was a hindrance right from the off imo. Behaved incredibly savvily at times, but at what cost?

What's very noticeable about many of these cuttings from the time is how quickly a quite inaccurate account of events took hold.

Indeed. But also I find it curious that right from the off it’s being suggested by those who knew Suzy that this story was more than mere ‘man posing as house-buyer abducts estate agent’. Take NB, who says: “I feel sure that the man must have met Susie sometime before abducting her.” While in a separate story her friends were said to be compiling lists of guests at recent parties, in case ‘Kipper’ had been in attendance. Perhaps imaginations were simply going into overdrive in those early, frenetic days, but it suggests to me the flatmate and friends had reason to suspect this was more than a simple house viewing gone wrong. There was evidently a lot going on in this woman’s life and I’d be surprised if her nearest and dearest even knew the half of it.
 
  • #739
I think Cannan may have chosen Foye House, Leigh Woods, in Bristol, because it was a just a stone's throw from the location where another murder victim from 1984; Shelley Morgan, was alleged to have gone to and from where she was abducted and murdered; her remains later being found in Backwell.

Cannan was in prison at the time of Shelley's murder, but it may be that Cannan deliberately wanted to get a flat close the site where another killer had previously operated.

That's just my opinion of course.

This sounds a bit far fetched. There's no concrete evidence that Shelley was in Leigh Woods. The last confirmed sighting of her was in Bedminster, Bristol.

More likely that Cannan chose the Clifton area to be near his girlfriend, who lived and worked there.
 
  • #740
Cannan was still using that car when he was nicked, so the connection was easily made.

The thing is, as LSW has noted, there's no evidence he was using a BMW at all in July 1986. JD has asserted that he is "personally confident that Cannan had access to a BMW" at that time. Whatever weight you attach to that, it's only relevant if you assume Cannan was the driver of the BMW that the jogger saw. If so, then you need to make the evidence fit the hypothesis by showing he had a BMW. And suddenly JD is convinced he had a BMW.

My concern is that had someone looking like SJL screaming / laughing been seen in the Noddy car, JC would have been fitted up with having owned one of those instead. His supposed 1986 BMW was registered to someone somewhere - why was it never identified if it existed?
On JD saying JC had access to a BMW in July 86, was this via the hire firm that is flagged in article upthread? It said JC worked there part time & had access to BMWs! If this information is correct, but not really in public domain, may explain JD’s confidence!

On the BMW you have x3 of interest;

1. We have RT saying he saw a BMW - it was navy blue -in Shorrolds Rd. Similar to a 518 (1974-1981) rather than the 2000 series earlier BMWs which were 1968-74. Other reports say it was the latter, a 2.4 or 2.8. RT a buff so what he said priob most accurate. He later said he saw it being driven around Fulham!

2. LHD BMW of January 1987 - Kiper’s -stolen in Belgium - found in Jan 87 approx in St John’s Wood.
Blue Grey
4 door

THIS BMW jogged a lot of memories (!) about the Shorrolds BMW above it seems. Surely none too accurate or detailed on model after all that time!

Was dismissed as different model/age to BMW in point 1 & being ‘repaired’ in Belgium at time.

3. Jogger seeing LHD (?) BMW - only after asked if poss - on 28 July 86. Shaun the DI on
Crimewatch says could have been a series 5 so like Kiper’s then (?)

Interestingly in reconstruction looks suspiciously like JC’s 87 BMW :)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1185.webp
    IMG_1185.webp
    28.4 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_1184.webp
    IMG_1184.webp
    337.5 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
282
Guests online
4,461
Total visitors
4,743

Forum statistics

Threads
643,128
Messages
18,794,125
Members
245,068
Latest member
idgi
Back
Top