- Joined
- Sep 3, 2019
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 1,948
Yes, that’s what’s Barley thought I believe.I didn't realise JC used the phrase "another girl" in that interview. Do you think he is referring to SC here?
Yes, that’s what’s Barley thought I believe.I didn't realise JC used the phrase "another girl" in that interview. Do you think he is referring to SC here?
Focus and fulcrum I think.What's "focrum" supposed to mean?
There was another officer with Barley wasn't there? Addy or something like that? What did he think I wonder?Yes, that’s what’s Barley thought I believe.
He is the one who was totally unconvinced by JC, or at least prepared to be very open minded, on JC at start of 2000 investigation. He’s featuted in ‘The Man Who Killed SL’ doc. He’s impressive, and after reviewing all evidence became thoroughly convinced.There was another officer with Barley wasn't there? Addy or something like that? What did he think I wonder?
So Ault, then, was the officer accompanying Barley that day? Not sure where I got Addy from. Must be someone else.He is the one who was totally unconvinced by JC, or at least prepared to be very open minded, on JC at start of 2000 investigation. He’s featuted in ‘The Man Who Killed SL’ doc. He’s impressive, and after reviewing all evidence became thoroughly convinced.
I believe SA, yes, but Barley uses a different name, you reference, but same initials, in recent podcast. I am not sure if the same person?So Ault, then, was the officer accompanying Barley that day?
I think you may be righti think JC could be playing mind games with everyone. he wanted to be notorious in some way. to be infamous in british criminal history, so what does he do. he pretends to be mr kipper, the mystery killer who snatched SL in broad daylight, but in reality he did no such thing.
fingerprint on letter, SC case. its not JC who left that print.Prime Suspect is very credible, well researched & decent source material, it’s packed with useful material. Of course nothing is infallible. JC hasn’t been ruled out of SC murder as far as I know, it remains open.
Can you elaborate on that Lee? I haven't read Prime Suspect but that sounds like an interesting line of discussion.fingerprint on letter, SC case. its not JC who left that print.
i like the way you think. i had not thought of that. JC has also become the HFSR who ran riot raping many women in 1980, but we now know he was not the HFSR. like you said, was JC a fantasist. this makes me even more convinced he is not mr kipper.I think you may be right
Hence why JC wore a motorcycle helmet for his botched attempt in Leamington Spa; the day he was caught. He was trying IMO to emulate the notorious House of Sale Rapist who ran riot throughout the West Midlands for around a year or so in 1980.
The HFS rapist was never caught, but it's fair to say that Cannan certainly wasn't the HFS rapist.
Was Cannan a fantasist copycat?
there was a fingerprint on the letter sent to detectives working the SC case. iam sure you have heard about the letter, if not. it was sent by someone saying SC death was an accident, and the person responsible is really unhappy about what happened, or something along them lines, but what is interesting is there was a fingerprint found on the letter or envelope, and iam sure i read JC had been ruled because of the print. the letter was posted from southampton which is 80 miles from london, and i cant imagine JC driving 80 miles to post that letter. he would have been working at the prop hire company in acton when that letter was sent.Can you elaborate on that Lee? I haven't read Prime Suspect but that sounds like an interesting line of discussion.
ault was not convinced like barley was. ault could see JC was playing silly mind games pretending to be mr kipper.So Ault, then, was the officer accompanying Barley that day? Not sure where I got Addy from. Must be someone else.
Yes, I've seen Ault being interviewed for that programme. I like that he admits to being sceptical at first, then becoming convinced.
these prison terms are a joke. nonces like these should get the US, sentence, life without parole, which does not exist here in the UK but it should.These are the minimum sentences for some 80s and 90s UK murderers.
John Cannan 40 years (reduced to 35 on appeal).
Donald Robertson 30 years.
Colin Pitchfork 30 years (reduced to 28).
Colin Campbell 24 years.
Christopher Hampton 22 years.
Marc Shillibier 22 years.
Sandip Patel 19 years.
just checked. it was JH QE2 lover.That was apparently DH on pact, her fondest & enduring love, not JH, but who knows re: JH too? I guess it made sense for JH & SL to go together as both had QE2 in common with marrying couple. They’d all worked together.
yes, it has to go through the editing process. what i liked about crimewatch was they would use the real players in the case as well as actors. real players and real locations like SL flat in putney and nick bryant SL flatmate/lodger appear in the reconstruction. crimewatch was a head of its time.The Crimewatch reconstruction was aired on Friday 17th October 1986 (or possibly Thursday 16th October 1986), so this image of the Red Sierra parked in Stevenage Road, had to have been filmed sometime between August to early October 1986.
It would then take a few days of post-editing to make the footage ready to be aired on the TV, so I would imagine that August or September are most likely.
JC was a cowboy when it came to leaving evidence behind. SB case is a great example. mr kipper left no trace. mr kipper pulled off the perfect crime then vanished into thin air taking lamplugh with him. this why i dont think JC is responsible for SL abduction/murder.What is considered the crime scene for the killing? The car never revealed any forensics.
JC left enough in the SB killing to build the case against him.
A stopped clock is correct twice a day. People make mistakes, even killers. The fact that his MO was sloppy doesn't proclude the chance that he killed SJL and everything went right for him on that particular day.JC was a cowboy when it came to leaving evidence behind. SB case is a great example. mr kipper left no trace. mr kipper pulled off the perfect crime then vanished into thin air taking lamplugh with him. this why i dont think JC is responsible for SL abduction/murder.
The UK now has life without parole sentences (whole life tariffs). The likes of Pitchfork and Campbell would get whole life tariffs these days. Perhaps Cannan too.these prison terms are a joke. nonces like these should get the US, sentence, life without parole, which does not exist here in the UK but it should.
I think you may be right
Hence why JC wore a motorcycle helmet for his botched attempt in Leamington Spa; the day he was caught. He was trying IMO to emulate the notorious House of Sale Rapist who ran riot throughout the West Midlands for around a year or so in 1980.
The HFS rapist was never caught, but it's fair to say that Cannan certainly wasn't the HFS rapist.
Was Cannan a fantasist copycat?
Probably belonged to the till person at W H Smith who sold him the envelope!there was a fingerprint on the letter sent to detectives working the SC case.