The digital forensics guy testified -- there was nothing on ER's devices.
Consciousness of Guilt is a real thing. Walk the Dog aside, her deleted internet searches sink her.
The State isn't tasked with proving their case beyond ALL doubt. There remain unanswered questions in EVERY case I've followed. Often because defendants successfully destroyed evidence.
Here, meticulously, digital forensics triangulation and corroborated -- didn't matter what lied may have been told -- the phones of three people (four if you count Nicole) show their interactions, messages, phone calls, travel, drug runs in the time period leading up to ER's death and bam! Fentanyl. 5x the lethal dose. There is no evidence that ER took hard drugs, except for a couple pills after an old surgery! He wasn't a hard-core fentanyl user with a high tolerance! Occasional THC user, none of which was in his system at death.
So we have an obvious pipeline for the drug that killed ER. Digital forensics doesn't lie. It's the new DNA.
It's the Defense's case that's in trouble.
JMO