But the judges also get confused about hearsay as well.
The defense is allowing these compound questions because they add to the confusion. Objection....compound question!!!
Approach and refresh her recollection. Point it out. This is stupid.
I think she is enjoying the attention.
I just graduated and will never be confused about hearsay. We were grilled in Evidence, (a seated judge was our professor) and in Trial class and in all preparations for Evidence hearsay is the big subject that takes the most time to study. I guess I don't get the confusion. You have a list of hearsay objections, pick one.
There might be slight variances from state to state but they are pretty consistent and usually based on the federal rules of evidence.
And don't worry because most attorneys get confused about hearsay too
I just graduated and will never be confused about hearsay. We were grilled in Evidence, (a seated judge was our professor) and in Trial class and in all preparations for Evidence hearsay is the big subject that takes the most time to study. I guess I don't get the confusion. You have a list of hearsay objections, pick one.
She's lying and hedging, but she's doing it in such a pleasant manner that it's not going to be obvious to the jury - since they don't know the whole back story.
Never say never...
I read where this judge is like an expert on Rules of Evidence, so I bet these attorneys are a little intimidated. When the judge asked for the Prosecutors reasoning for an exception to the hearsay rule, the Prosecutor's voice went up as if his reason was a question.
I really admire you for being able to know all these rules and cases etc. It is a lot of info and details.