What evidence has the FBI provided to the contrary? A photo and rumors that Amy was human trafficked? I also fee its highly possible that she fell overboard.Why would I be open to a possibility that's been logically disproven by the FBI?
What evidence has the FBI provided to the contrary? A photo and rumors that Amy was human trafficked? I also fee its highly possible that she fell overboard.Why would I be open to a possibility that's been logically disproven by the FBI?
I personally don’t believe falling overboard is any “nicer” than drug or alcohol poisoning and subsequent hiding of her body. I think it’s the most likely, but any of these outcomes are tragic, with years of forced sex work obviously more upsetting for the family. In any case, it seems obvious that she has passed now, with little chance for answers.The FBI is a professional organization. Their words have meaning and are not chosen willy-nilly.
Amy was last seen with Alister Douglas coming out of the elevator by three different people.
I am not sure why people assert that either Amy fell off the ship, or she was sex trafficked. There are obviously more possibilities than that.
The Jas photos may very well not be Amy. That doesn't mean that she fell off the ship.
There is no logic whatsoever to the overboard theory. It's just what people want to believe because it's nicer than the alternatives.
I’m not arguing anything on this thread, just stating my opinion that it’s most likely that she went overboard, followed by alcohol poisoning, drug overdose and really nothing after that because I find other explanations too unlikely.And? I'm finding it really hard to understand exactly what your point is. Yes, perhaps a 15-year-old is easier to deceive. But so what? No one said Amy was "deceived" into anything. It's not like she was lured to a car or to a park with the promise of petting a puppy.
The argument was that traffickers don't just kidnap people like this, and that argument is proven untrue by the fact that it actually does happen. The government says so, the cruising industry says so, and there's evidence of it actually happening in black and white. My links prove all the above so I'm not sure what we're still arguing.
Yes, I did. A name of one person being forcibly abducted from a cruise ship would be helpful.Did you see the links I posted above? They specifically state that cruise ships are used to recruit and traffick people. We actually don't know if people may have been "forcibly abducted" from a cruise ship or how many because it isn't a common crime due to limitations of cruise ships. But to say it never happens or can't happen is inaccurate, IMO. There are a number of scenarios in which I can envision this happening, just like regular abductions on land.
When has the FBI ever said that she didn't fall off the ship?Why would I be open to a possibility that's been logically disproven by the FBI?
What resources have they spent on the case other than make routine updates to the missing person's flyer? It's not as though they're actively searching the Caribbean for her at the moment.There are a number of crimes that happen on-board cruise ships and several people who go missing.
Knowing this, I don't understand why it's so difficult to believe that a young woman could have been drugged during the course of a crime or in preparation of a crime as the ship arrived at port.
There are two theories that are believable to me: that she unintentionally died while being drugged/raped and the body was concealed to be dumped at sea or that she drugged and abducted off the ship.
The theory of going overboard, while most likely in the case of average cruise ship missing person, is not consistent in this case with the amount of time, money, and manpower by the FBI who has a lot more information we do. It's also inconsistent with the number of witnesses who've come forward and deemed to be at least somewhat credible by the FBI.
AND the FBI. I don't know why that is being dismissed or minimized. The FBI does not waste decades of valuable resources on cases like this unless they feel there is reason to do so.
Just because we have a different theory does not mean that we are not well-informed on the reality of human trafficking or the complexity of abducted someone from a cruise ship. We can be just as well-informed as you, or more so, and still have this theory.
MOO.
That is not how the FBI handles cruise ship disappearances, or any case for that matter. They only investigate cases where there is evidence that a federal crime was likely committed. They do not just investigate ''any case'' and keep open until they find evidence. If that were true, that would be investigating every missing person or homicide case, which they do not.I’m not arguing anything on this thread, just stating my opinion that it’s most likely that she went overboard, followed by alcohol poisoning, drug overdose and really nothing after that because I find other explanations too unlikely.
We don’t know what evidence the FBI has, but keeping the investigation open in the absence of any conclusive evidence is consistent with how they’ve handled other cruise ship disappearances. When they found evidence, they closed those cases. Offering a reward and asking for tips is not the same as putting extensive resources into actively investigating this as a crime.
Even if they suspect she fell overboard as I do, I’m glad the FBI does not draw conclusions without ample evidence. As I stated before, in my opinion, it doesn’t mean they think something nefarious happened to her. They have no conclusive evidence, so the case remains open for tips.
Regardless of what we each believe ultimately happened, I think the one thing we can all agree on is that we want closure and some sense of peace for the Bradley family.Well I’m just up here on the fence, I’ll entertain any theory at this point. Which makes me feel terrible for her family, I can’t imagine the endless ruminating. Praying they reach any iota of peace
Your own source says the FBI investigates evidence until it is determined there is no crime. There is no conclusive evidence she went overboard. In 2025, most ships have cameras. Your own source says the FBI even investigates overboard cases to determine responsibility (e.g., intoxication). The FBI continues to investigate cruise missing person cases until they can find conclusive evidence of what happened.That is not how the FBI handles cruise ship disappearances, or any case for that matter. They only investigate cases where there is evidence that a federal crime was likely committed. They do not just investigate ''any case'' and keep open until they find evidence. If that were true, that would be investigating every missing person or homicide case, which they do not.
International Cruise Victims Association reports they have been told by the FBI that a person overboard is not necessarily a crime and thus will not be investigated and not included in the FBI's official statistics. It is difficult to understand how a determination can be made about whether a case of a person overboard is not a crime without a proper investigation. Even if CCTV videotapes show a person falling overboard, an investigation may be warranted to determine the conditions surrounding the incident, for example whether intoxication is an issue and whether the cruise ship was responsible in serving alcohol. Current wording of the CVSSA does not classify a person overboard as a crime.
Your own source says the FBI investigates evidence until it is determined there is no crime. There is no conclusive evidence she went overboard. In 2025, most ships have cameras. Your own source says the FBI even investigates overboard cases to determine responsibility (e.g., intoxication). The FBI continues to investigate cruise missing person cases until they can find conclusive evidence of what happened.
How long has that been out for? There was an alleged sighting of her in San Francisco in 2003... Doesn't seem plausible that she was able to enter and exit the country unnoticed regardless, but even more so with that "Yellow Notice" out.
Amy Bradley also still has a ''Yellow Notice'' out for her via INTERPOL. The world's largest international police organization. This alert goes out to all 196 Interpol member countries, falicilating the sharing of information between various international agencies. This alert also allows for Amy to be detained if she is recognized by a customs official.
About Yellow Notices
A Yellow Notice is a global police alert to help locate missing persons.www.interpol.int
From their website:
What is a Yellow Notice?
A Yellow Notice is a global police alert for a missing person. It is published for victims of parental abductions, criminal abductions (kidnappings) or unexplained disappearances.
The Yellow Notice can also be used to help identify a person who is unable to identify himself or herself.
This is a valuable law enforcement tool that can increase the chances of a missing person being located, particularly if there is a possibility that the person might travel, or be taken, abroad.
Why is the Yellow Notice important?
- It gives high, international visibility to cases
- Abducted/missing persons are flagged to border officials, making travel difficult
- Countries can request and share critical information linked to the investigation.
It was published in 2011. Hence the case number #2011-955How long has that been out for? There was an alleged sighting of her in San Francisco in 2003... Doesn't seem plausible that she was able to enter and exit the country unnoticed regardless, but even more so with that "Yellow Notice" out.
There is NO verification that she is a “person overboard,” therefore the FBI is investigating this case as a missing American. The FBI does not form an opinion without evidence, that is not how investigations work. Now there are alarms and sirens that can instantly verify if a person has gone overboard.The source clearly states that a person overboard is not crime and thus will not be investigated or classified as such in FBI official statistics.
Also, taking a look at the FBI's official website, I'm not seeing any other cruise ship disappearances listed. In fact, there are none, at all. Except for Amy Lynn Bradley.![]()
Kidnappings & Missing Persons | Federal Bureau of Investigation
Select the images to display more information.www.fbi.gov
There is NO verification that she is a “person overboard,” therefore the FBI is investigating this case as a missing American. The FBI does not form an opinion without evidence, that is not how investigations work. Now there are alarms and sirens that can instantly verify if a person has gone overboard.
Rebecca Coriam’s case would almost certainly be an open FBI investigation, except that she is British. Many circumstances are similar to AB’s.
The case of George Smith was investigated by the FBI, but they found evidence in that case, so more conclusions could be made about what happened.
There is no conclusive evidence in this case.
I can't even comprehend how some here completely deny she was abducted. It's unfathomable to me.Did you see the links I posted above? They specifically state that cruise ships are used to recruit and traffick people. We actually don't know if people may have been "forcibly abducted" from a cruise ship or how many because it isn't a common crime due to limitations of cruise ships. But to say it never happens or can't happen is inaccurate, IMO. There are a number of scenarios in which I can envision this happening, just like regular abductions on land.
Evidence. As in, there is no conclusive evidence for any theory. Very sad for her family.I can't even comprehend how some here completely deny she was abducted. It's unfathomable to me.