- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 1,315
- Reaction score
- 2,402
I would imagine that, if the subject of the photograph knew about it, she wouldn't exactly want it to be known around the world that she had been a sex worker.
I get the desperate desire of a parent to have the fate of their child settled. My serious questions about what they choose to say, and not say, about their daughter and her disappearance aside, it does not seem to me that this has actually done them much good. Is the belief that Amy is out there really something that brings them that much comfort if they believe she has been put through unimaginable suffering for most of her life? She is just as removed from them.
I would also suggest that this media portrayal of Amy's disappearance as linked to sex trafficking has actually done not a small amount of general harm, by misrepresenting what sex trafficking is. There are very few cases of comparatively happy tourists being abducted and made into sex slaves. There are many more cases of people in marginal situations--unhappy teenagers, runaways, LGBTQ people--who are slowly taken into the sex trafficking networks, often incrementally. The sensationalizing of Amy's disappearance really has helped lots of people misunderstand what is going on with this very real problem.
Again, unless you're in their shoes, or have experienced that loss, what you believe is most "helpful" in terms of how the Bradley's should think, feel, or respond to a tragedy of this magnitude is irrelevant.
In any case, I chose not to challenge your last comment. Instead, I moved on to seperate discussion points, as I don't believe criticizing a grieving family is useful or pertinent. Yet, you keep circling back.
Respectfully, I'm not interested in engaging with you further on this point. We can disagree. It's alright to do so. There's no need to convince you of my perspective and vice versa.