- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 2,865
- Reaction score
- 26,884
I believe it is "sarcasm." I think the implication is that a juror is a juror regardless of gender.I’m missing something because 9+3=12. Am I glaringly missing a point?
Last edited:
I believe it is "sarcasm." I think the implication is that a juror is a juror regardless of gender.I’m missing something because 9+3=12. Am I glaringly missing a point?
Thank you Luna20If it’s in the DM it is an approved source.
When I think of FA, Isiah and his family I get a sick feeling in my stomach.I definitely appreciate that insight. I hate the fact that violent criminals might be given low/no bonds.
(Nod to your comments as well @Kalanit )
I just find it odd that this jury didn't convict Dad for attempted murder. Left-leaning citizens hate abuse by males.
I'm still so upset with this outcome.
Thank you Luna20
Intervention please...![]()
Shocking new revelations about father in attempted 'honor killing'
Ihsan Ali, 44, and his wife Zahraa Subhi Mohsin Ali, 40, are charged with second-degree attempted murder and attempted kidnapping after the attack on October 18.www.dailymail.co.uk
Had any of those events of domestic assault /child abuse been reported to the police they might have been able to have been entered as evidence against IA by the state.If it’s in the DM it is an approved source.
It's not that type of area. Without giving out too much personal information, each and every person I know in Lacey is extremely left-leaning. Evergreen State College is a short bus ride away. My personal feeling with the jury, knowing what I do of the area, is that they didn't want to seem prejudiced against the defendants, so they swung the pendulum hard the other way. Similar to the argument the defense lawyer made for the mother- he knew the jury. The defense lawyer for the father only used the tactic of parenting because it was the only defense he had at all.
I didn't mention sentencing, someone else did. But judges only sentence that way because they think that is what their constituents want- because of the area they are in. That is the jury pool, that is what is has to do with lenient judges and overall politics of an area.
* my opinion
p.s I'm steaming mad too!
I doubt we will ever know what happens to Fatima. Her and Isiah may be together right now and this situation has been her escape for now but she will need to leave the area and at 18 and not even working this is going to be tough. It must have been awful to have to make the choice to charge your own parents and the state charged both of them. Don't trust Mrs. Ali either.What a horrible outcome for Fatima. She was so brave to continue to stand up for herself to her family. I hope she can get far away from them and live a happy life.
i saw some post verdict commentary on court tv with Vinnie Politan and 3 other people who's named i don't remember. but i turned it off pretty quick because they were all saying that they felt that the jury "got it right"Unless I missed it Court TV sure disappeared quickly after the verdict...no post verdict commentary at all. I think this judge gonna be real easy on IA and he could back home by the end of the year.
can you tell us if there is a large presence of immigrants from middle east including Iraq? Wondering if they are known in the community?
Yeah. I agree. Coddling.What coddling? I think this was driven by jurors that thought that no one should speak against parental rights. I think it relates to Libertarianism. No one should tell me what I do with my kids.
I think most left-leaning people are aghast at this verdict.
Yeah. I agree. Coddling.Sick of the coddling.
Fully expected from this part of Washington state.
I'd leave here if I could.
Except that we know that juries are often swayed by political or cultural leanings. It's the reason for preemptory challenges during voir dire. It's a huge part of our judicial system. It's why attorneys spend colossal amounts of time studying jury pools, both live and in "practice sessions".Why does that matter? I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I'm kind of offended by some of the comments around this trial all over the Internet. There are plenty of cases where people we all think are guilty are found not guilty. We ask a jury to make that determination and we can have our opinions regarding guilt or innocence, but we're not on the jury. The fact that the jury's decision in this case has been ridiculed with regard to nationality, foreign cultures, and politics is sad and disappointing to see.
These are 12 individuals who took time out of their lives to do their civic duty. We may feel they got it wrong, but assigning ulterior motives to their decision feels just as wrong.
MOO. This is not commentary on the guilt or innocence of the parents. This is commentary on how the jury's decision is being interpreted as being manipulated by political or cultural leanings, which if I find offensive.
MOO.