Was Burke involved?

Was Burke involved in JB's death?

  • Burke was involved in the death of JBR

    Votes: 377 59.6%
  • Burke was totally uninvolved in her death

    Votes: 256 40.4%

  • Total voters
    633
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,621
divert, deflect, deny

my DD does that sometimes: when I ask "what about this here?" she wants me to look "over there" instead

LOL
 
  • #1,622
Ah yes Burke, the son that this thread is about. The brother of the kidnap turned murder victim who was asleep in the room closest to JonBenet's in the house. Not surprising at all that the parents, on a completely different floor from the children, didn't hear anything. But Burke- who may have seen or heard something- however small and seemingly inconsequential was never wakened, summoned or questioned?

This about Elizabeth Smart and the little sister that shared the same room.

(Please don't patronize me with the fact that Burke did not share the same room. I live in a new house circa 2002, double paned windows with extra internal insulation, the works- I can hear things in our daughters room on the other side of our closet, our master bath and down a hall. Even if I couldn't I would TRY TO FIND OUT IF MY REMAINING CHILD HEARD ANYTHING- ANYTHING!)


The Smarts and their extended family persistently maintained a presence in the local and national media, in order to keep Elizabeth's name in the press, providing the media with home videos of her as a teenager and as a child, and created a website to serve as a resource center.

After several months, a breakthrough came in October 2002, when Mary Katherine suddenly remembered where she had heard Mitchell's voice, telling her parents, "I think I know who it is: Emmanuel."[24]
The Smarts sought to help unemployed people in the community by paying them for odd jobs or handy work around the property.[25]

Mary Katherine now identified "Emmanuel"/Mitchell as the man who had abducted her sister. When this was reported to the police, they had doubts as to its reliability. Mary Katherine had barely heard the suspect's quiet voice and for only a few minutes, and had just awakened from sleep. When it was reported several months later that she thought it was the voice of a man she had only met briefly and more than a year before, the police did not consider it a worthy lead.
Tensions developed as the parents accused the police of not thoroughly following up on this lead.

The family used the services of sketch artist Dalene Nielson[29] to draw "Emmanuel's" face from memory. In February, this drawing was released to the media, with the assistance of John Walsh, who revealed it in an appearance on Larry King Live and on his own series, America's Most Wanted. The drawing was recognized by Emmanuel's family, who reported his actual name, Brian David Mitchell, to the police and provided them with contemporary photographs of Mitchell.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Smart_kidnapping"]Elizabeth Smart kidnapping - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
  • #1,623
BBM
First, it’s probably useless to attempt to establish facts on the doors or windows open or not, imo, there's too much rumor clouding this topic. However, here is some additional source information for people to make up their own mind.

1) In the depo with ST for the CW suit against the R’s, LW does not provide a source for information about the question he asks ST which is: Did you hear that there was an unlocked door and 6 windows open? Unfortunately, while ST wants to know LW’s source of info, LW only says it was someone in the BPD, no name attached.

2) Early on the scene was officer French who stated he, “did a quick inspection of the interior of the house and found all the doors locked, including the door leading from JonBenet’s bedroom to the second floor balcony. . . John told Officer French that he too had personally checked for unlocked doors and windows – John said he found the house locked up as it had been left the night before.” (Bonita papers)

3) Regards Dan Glick of Newsweek and his article, here’s Frank Coffman’s (a freelance reporter/photographer) take on Dan Glick: “The Ramseys have managed to find sympathetic media ears. Dan Glick at Newsweek became a virtual apologist for the couple, all the while claiming that he was "agnostic" about their guilt or innocence.” (Media people obviously with different ideas)

4) Lastly, from 48 hours: When several different people were interviewed and one of them was Greg McCrary, former profiler with the FBI, McCrary commented dispassionately, that he thought the report of open windows and doors was interesting, but it doesn't prove an intruder killed JonBenet. "What we have to do is go back to basics," says McCrary. "And that is we've got a child killed in the house. Staging the writing of the note. These are significant issues. We've got to assign weight in any crime scene. We'll never be able to thoroughly explain everything."

Just strolling on through with some additional info. So, take all this as you will. MHO
In regards to BOLD text quoted above (BBM). Quote from article: law-enforcement officials told NEWSWEEK that the police knew several windows and a door had been unlocked that night.
...

AK
 
  • #1,624
Then that means the Ramseys are liars since JR insisted all doors and windows were locked that day/night.

Can't have it both ways. Either it's rumor and JR isn't lying, or it's fact and JR is lying, in which case, why?

It wouldn’t make them liars, it would make them wrong.
...

AK
 
  • #1,625
The nonsense is in knowing that a child was missing and a ransom note had been left and the mother who found it did not read every word and follow every instruction to get her daughter back safely. NOT ONLY DID THE MOTHER NOT FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS- the ones that WERE VERY CLEAR THAT THE KIDNAPPERS WERE LISTENING, WATCHING AND WAITING... she phoned her very close friends, her children's pediatrician and her priest TO COME TO THE HOUSE BEFORE THE RAMSOM CALL!

Come on!

Mrs Ramsey panicked, and called 91 before reading the note – look at the first page of the note and you will see that there are no threats on that page. Mrs Ramsey called 911 before she made any other phone calls (if RDI, than she should have called others first).
...

AK
 
  • #1,626
They didn't even wake their son to ask him what he may have even heard.

How is that possible? Does that make any sense to you?

Please explain this to me, I so want to hear an answer that makes any bit of sense!

Mrs Ramsey called the police first. That makes sense to me. Mrs Ramsey called others next. That makes sense to me (I can understand why some people would do that). The police arrived within minutes. Before the police arrived, Mr Ramsey checked on Burke. That makes sense to me. He did not wake Burke. That makes sense to me.

I don’t believe for a minute that Burke was never asked if he had heard anything, or if he had awakened during the night, etc. He may not have been asked immediately, but I bet that the discussion and questions you think should have been asked were asked. So, this isn’t a question of Burke not being queried, it’s really just a question of when he was queried.
...

AK
 
  • #1,627
Mrs Ramsey panicked, and called 91 before reading the note – look at the first page of the note and you will see that there are no threats on that page. Mrs Ramsey called 911 before she made any other phone calls (if RDI, than she should have called others first).
...

AK

I am not debating this- I am talking about what I would do, and how what was done makes no sense to me at all.

Of course the Ramsey's had all the time in the world to ask those questions of Burke- there was no urgency. She wasn't "missing" nor "kidnapped", she was dead in the house, interestingly!

I welcome an answer that makes sense to me. Yours doesn't, and I am trying.

ETA Oops sorry, I quoted the wrong post!
 
  • #1,628
Mrs Ramsey called the police first. That makes sense to me. Mrs Ramsey called others next. That makes sense to me (I can understand why some people would do that). The police arrived within minutes. Before the police arrived, Mr Ramsey checked on Burke. That makes sense to me. He did not wake Burke. That makes sense to me.

I don’t believe for a minute that Burke was never asked if he had heard anything, or if he had awakened during the night, etc. He may not have been asked immediately, but I bet that the discussion and questions you think should have been asked were asked. So, this isn’t a question of Burke not being queried, it’s really just a question of when he was queried.
...

AK

Sorry- I meant to quote this post!
 
  • #1,629
James Kolar's Foreign Faction/kindle location 3316

Kinda like a bucket of cold water...

It's startling when it's laid out like that.

The point I was making... What happened to the alarms in 2001?
I would think, after something like they claim to have been through, they would be super hyper vigilant about security. But no, not John Ramsey.

I totally get you. In fact when we moved into the house I'm in currently, the previous owner had installed an alarm. I wasn't used to having one, and given the type of neighborhood I live in, never really bothered with it. When I heard about Elizabeth Smart (or possibly the Polly Klass case), and then right on the heels of that was the horrific case in Fla (the poor child's name escapes me ATM), I thought to myself "dear god, they're taking kids right out of their beds. It's not about being snatched from the mall, or the bus stop, these creeps are actually coming into the house."

And from that day forward, I've set my alarm every night. I even go as far as getting up from bed and "checking" to make sure it's set. I've never even had something horrible happen to our family, and I'm hyper-vigilant when it comes to my kids.
 
  • #1,630
I would never in my wildest dreams imagine coming across a note, in my home, put on my private back staircase, which someone had placed in the middle of the night, unbeknownst to me, and not. read. every. word. of. said. note.
 
  • #1,631
Supposedly after John and Patsy Ramsey had their home invaded and their daughter murdered, right under their noses...
They were not hyper vigilant as one might expect.
John and Patsy Ramsey Atlanta 2001 Burglary....John Ramsey surprises burglar at his home, John Ramsey either scuffled or wrestled with a tall, black man ...

I put forth, any concerns about security were for show, they didn't fear intruders...they ACTED like they had security fears.

IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I do not disagree about the Ramsey's future concerns for security from potential intruders was nil. In fact, it is my belief that the Ramsey's had a security system installed at Charlevoix home due to the intrusion of the paparazzi. Hence, the same reason for obtaining a specially trained dog for Burke was to keep the paparazzi at bay.

Within weeks after the murder of his sister, the Ramsey's allowed Burke to return to school to complete the school year. Consequently, there must not have been fears of Burke being abducted nor of him being murdered.
 
  • #1,632
Kinda like a bucket of cold water...

It's startling when it's laid out like that.



I totally get you. In fact when we moved into the house I'm in currently, the previous owner had installed an alarm. I wasn't used to having one, and given the type of neighborhood I live in, never really bothered with it. When I heard about Elizabeth Smart (or possibly the Polly Klass case), and then right on the heels of that was the horrific case in Fla (the poor child's name escapes me ATM), I thought to myself "dear god, they're taking kids right out of their beds. It's not about being snatched from the mall, or the bus stop, these creeps are actually coming into the house."

And from that day forward, I've set my alarm every night. I even go as far as getting up from bed and "checking" to make sure it's set. I've never even had something horrible happen to our family, and I'm hyper-vigilant when it comes to my kids.


Jonbenet wasn't taken from her home though, which makes this an entirely different crime.

Its not an abduction.
 
  • #1,633
Jonbenet wasn't taken from her home though, which makes this an entirely different crime.

Its not an abduction.

But we were discussing how the Rs could have been so lax regarding security in their home after JRBs murder.
 
  • #1,634
I do not disagree about the Ramsey's future concerns for security from potential intruders was nil. In fact, it is my belief that the Ramsey's had a security system installed at Charlevoix home due to the intrusion of the paparazzi. Hence, the same reason for obtaining a specially trained dog for Burke was to keep the paparazzi at bay.

Within weeks after the murder of his sister, the Ramsey's allowed Burke to return to school to complete the school year. Consequently, there must not have been fears of Burke being abducted nor of him being murdered.

I think we spend all of our lives trying to prevent the worst. I think if the worst happens to you you figure that the odds are in your favor. IT is also possible that because he had so many people that he was consulting with they gave him a good profile of the perp and made him realize that Burke was not at risk.

jmo
 
  • #1,635
I do not disagree about the Ramsey's future concerns for security from potential intruders was nil. In fact, it is my belief that the Ramsey's had a security system installed at Charlevoix home due to the intrusion of the paparazzi. Hence, the same reason for obtaining a specially trained dog for Burke was to keep the paparazzi at bay.

Within weeks after the murder of his sister, the Ramsey's allowed Burke to return to school to complete the school year. Consequently, there must not have been fears of Burke being abducted nor of him being murdered.
Patsy Ramsey in 2000:

21 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: All right.
22 Q. (By Mr. Kane) Mrs. Ramsey, after
23 the homicide, I mean, you mentioned several
24 times in the book on several occasions where
25 you wondered if the killer was watching you
0221
1 or following you. You know, I think you
2 described one time when you had some cable
3 that was cut at your house by some workmen
4 and the lights were out or something like
5 that, and Mr. Ramsey wondered if the killer
6 might be in there.
7 I mean, you had a concern about
8 this person being out there and coming after
9 you and your family after the homicide?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. All right. And I take it your
12 biggest concern was for Burke; is that
13 correct?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. All right. And you got -- there
16 were some security arrangements for Burke
17 when he went back to school, I believe, at
18 the end of January. Were you involved in
19 those discussions --
20 A. Absolutely.
21 Q. -- of the security arrangements?
22 Do you remember who those took place with or
23 where they took place?
24 A. At the High Peak School, we made
25 arrangements for Tracy Temple to be in there.
0222
1 She is with a security company in Colorado.
2 There were also parent volunteers who sat
3 outside the classroom and basically watched
4 him at all times.
5 Q. All right. And so you wanted to
6 have security in the school in case somebody
7 were to come in and try to do harm to
8 Burke?
9 A. And we set up a 911 system. The
10 teacher, I believe the teacher and one of
11 the parents would always have a little
12 medallion that they could press in an
13 emergency.
14 Q. Why was Tracy Temple only hired
15 for one week?
16 MR. WOOD: Why was she what?
17 Q. (By Mr. Kane) Why was Tracy
18 Temple only employed for one week to be at
19 the school?
20 A. Well, we wanted her to stay
21 longer, but the school felt like it was a
22 disruption to the children.
23 Q. So it was the school's decision,
24 not yours?
25 A. Yes. So we compromised and had
0223
1 the Burke watch set up.
2 Q. Why did you insist that Ms.
3 Temple be inside the classroom rather than
4 out in the hall?
5 A. She wasn't in the classroom.
6 Q. No, no, no. Why did you -- but
7 there was discussion that you had with the
8 school authorities that Tracy be allowed to
9 be inside the classroom, and the school
10 authorities objected to that. Do you recall
11 that?
12 MR. WOOD: Do you represent that
13 as fact?
14 MR. KANE: Yeah, that's a fact.
15 THE WITNESS: I don't, I --
16 Q. (By Mr. Kane) Do you remember
17 that?
18 A. I don't remember that.
19 Q. Okay. What was your concern? I
20 mean, what was in your mind when you were
21 trying to construct these security
22 arrangements with the 911 thing, with
23 Ms. Temple, with the moms and all? What was
24 the scenario you had in mind that you were
25 trying to protect against?
0224
1 A. One of my children had just been
2 brutally murdered in the sanctity of our
3 home. I have one remaining child, and I
4 didn't want him let out of my sight. I
5 didn't want him to return to school. I
6 didn't want to return to Boulder. I was
7 frightened for all of our safety.
8 Then it became apparent that it
9 would be in Burke's best interest to be back
10 in a routine in his normal environment with
11 his friends, and I saw the benefit of that.
12 And I said the only way I will let him go
13 is that if there is a great deal of security
14 put in place.
15 Q. And that's why you hired
16 professionals such as Tracy Temple?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. I think Ellis Armistead also had
19 some involvement in that; correct?
20 A. Well, together or somehow they
21 installed that wiring system and all that
22 kind of stuff.
23 Q. Why did you allow Burke to go to
24 school without a guard and have Susan Stein
25 transport him?
0225
1 A. Well, Susan had the medallion.
2 The medallion was in Burke's proximity at any
3 given time.
4 Q. That medallion worked in the
5 school, it was tied into something in the
6 principal's office; is that correct?
7 A. Right, right.
8 Q. So on the way to school it
9 wouldn't work. Why did you allow her to go
10 without any security and against Tracy
11 Temple's advice, as a matter of fact, to be
12 transported to and from school when he was
13 most vulnerable?
14 A. Well, he left the garage in a
15 locked car and drove straight to school and
16 then was escorted into the school.
17 Q. You didn't have any concerns about
18 somebody at a stop sign?
19 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, Michael --
20 MR. KANE: What is the objection
21 now?
22 MR. WOOD: I just wonder what
23 does this have to do with the investigation
24 into finding who killed JonBenet Ramsey?
25 MR. KANE: The very fact that I'm
0226
1 asking it means it has something to do with
2 it.
3 MR. WOOD: What?
4 MR. KANE: I don't have to, I
5 don't have to, if you're now going to make
6 me justify every question that I ask, now
7 we're so, you know, in the very beginning,
8 Lin, you sent a letter --
9 MR. WOOD: Don't point.
10 MR. KANE: I am not. I am just
11 emphasizing. You sent a letter --
12 MR. WOOD: I point sometimes.
13 MR. KANE: You know, this is
14 nothing personal. You are doing your job
15 and I am doing mine.
16 In the very beginning you sent a
17 letter to us, and you laid down this fair
18 and objective, as long as these questions are
19 fair and objective you'll answer, and I wrote
20 back to you, I wrote a letter back, and
21 within five minutes of you getting that
22 letter off your fax machine, you were on the
23 phone with me. And then the next thing you
24 said --
25 MR. WOOD: You know, I wrote a
0227
1 letter to Chief Beckner, which I would be
2 glad to make part of this record, and then I
3 got a letter from you, and I called you.
4 MR. KANE: That's right. And we
5 spoke about that the next day.
6 MR. WOOD: We talked for over an
7 hour and a half.
8 MR. KANE: And the next day you
9 wrote another letter saying that there would
10 be no conditions on this interview.
11 MR. WOOD: Now, wait a minute.
12 MR. KANE: Oh, yes, you did.
13 MR. WOOD: I didn't impose any
14 conditions.
15 MR. KANE: You are now. Now
16 you're asking me what's the purpose of me
17 asking a question. That's a condition.
18 MR. WOOD: No, it's not.
19 MR. KANE: What do you call it?
20 MR. WOOD: Just what it was.
21 I asked you a question.
22 MR. KANE: And I'm saying I don't
23 have to explain my purpose. I am asking the
24 question.
25 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane --
0228
1 MR. KANE: If you don't want to
2 answer the question, don't answer it, but I
3 don't have to justify the question.
4 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, you
5 misrepresent my letter to you. You
6 misrepresent our conversation. You
7 misrepresent your statements that I have
8 imposed conditions. Let me finish.
9 MR. KANE: You know, Mr. Wood,
10 this is a sham.
11 MR. WOOD: No, it's not.
12 MR. KANE: This is a big
13 publicity stunt on your part.
14 MR. WOOD: No, it's not.
15 MR. KANE: You want to go out
16 there and say my clients answered every
17 question. Well, don't say that because you
18 are not letting your client answer this
19 question.
20 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, why don't
21 you sit down and let's try --
22 MR. KANE: You are obstructing.
23 You are obstructing, Lin. You are asking me
24 now to justify why I am asking the
25 questions.
0229
1 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, sit down.
2 Sit down.
3 MR. KANE: Yes or no, can she
4 answer that question?
5 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, life does
6 not always turn on what Michael Kane thinks
7 is fair. Just give me a second. I don't
8 think I am being unreasonable.
9 MR. KANE: I think you are.
10 You're asking me to justify.
11 MR. WOOD: Give me a chance to
12 talk without jumping up and making your
13 preplanned speeches.
14 MR. KANE: You stated your
15 objection.
16 MR. WOOD: Now wait a minute.
17 You all made the request and you all set the
18 conditions, and I agreed to them at the
19 direction of John and Patsy. I got the
20 letters that demonstrate and document that.
21 The only thing I asked for was the courtesy
22 of whether you would consider this being done
23 in Atlanta, and you quickly said yes. I
24 asked for a stenographic reporter because of
25 the concern over an accurate transcript
0230
1 because there never had been one in the
2 prior interviews in April of '97 and in June
3 of 1998.
4 And that's it. I didn't impose
5 any conditions, and I don't want to be
6 misrepresented in that connection.
7 All I've done today, because I
8 thought we were here to be productive, in
9 looking for the killer of this child, the
10 parents want to come in here and help you,
11 but when you start asking questions about why
12 did you let Burke go to school with Susan
13 Stein, I mean, with all due respect, I mean,
14 I haven't instructed that she can't answer
15 it, but I don't think it's unfair and
16 unreasonable for me to say, what in the
17 world does that have to do with the question
18 of moving this investigation forward on who
19 killed this child.
20 MR. KANE: Let's go back to what
21 I said.
22 MR. WOOD: I didn't mean to get
23 you all upset and hot and bothered. I just
24 thought it was a fair question. To my mind,
25 Susan Stein drove Burke Ramsey to school in
0231
1 a locked automobile and dropped him off, I
2 am having a lot of trouble finding something
3 sinister about that or inconsistent with a
4 parent's love and protection of their son.
5 MR. KANE: Well, I think it is
6 inconsistent, number one. Number two, it
7 doesn't matter what I think.
8 MR. WOOD: It does. You are the
9 special prosecutor.
10 MR. KANE: What matters is, if
11 you ever think an intruder is going to be,
12 and I'm going to go back to the speech I
13 made in the very beginning that I made two
14 years ago to John Ramsey, if you ever expect
15 for us to be able to put a case against an
16 intruder together, the intruder is going to
17 ask that question. The intruder is going to
18 say, why is it that the parents of a month
19 after their child is murdered allow their son
20 to be transported at a time when he is most
21 vulnerable, at a time when their own security
22 people said this is crazy to be transported
23 with no protection. And that is a
24 legitimate question.
25 Now, are you going to let her
0232
1 answer or not?
2 MR. WOOD: Let me say this to
3 you. That, again, Mr. Kane -- and I don't
4 mean, Mr. Kane -- Michael, you know, you
5 have a perspective. I just think that what
6 you are trying to represent about the lack
7 of security --
8 MR. KANE: Mr. Wood, you are an
9 obstructionist.
10 MR. WOOD: Let me finish, Mike.
11 I'm not an obstructionist.
12 MR. KANE: You go out there and
13 you tell these press people that they
14 cooperated, and I will go out and tell them
15 what really happened in here.
16 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, what's
17 happened here is you are looking to storm
18 out for no reason.
19 MR. KANE: I'm looking to go
20 storm out because I can't ask a question --
21 MR. WOOD: Take five, take five
22 minutes and be reasonable enough to listen.
23 MR. KANE: Look, I don't need
24 this. It is a game. You're playing a
25 game.
0233
1 MR. LEVIN: Take five minute.
2 MR. WOOD: Take five minutes.
3 MR. KANE: Are we going to take
4 every five minutes every time I ask a
5 question because you want to, you want to
6 know what it is that's in my mind. I just
7 told you what's in my mind.
8 MR. WOOD: Mr. Kane, we are both
9 trying to do our jobs under very unusual and
10 difficult circumstances.
11 MR. KANE: Right. And my job is
12 not to stand in the way of the truth.
13 CHIEF BECKNER: Let us take a
14 time out.
15 MR. LEVIN: Let's take five
16 minutes.
17 MR. WOOD: If you are implying my
18 job is to obstruct the truth, I take that as
19 a professional insult. And you will not be
20 staying in my office. I pay the rent here.
21 I will not be insulted by you.
22 MR. KANE: That's fine.
23 CHIEF BECKNER: Time out. Time
24 out.
25 (A recess was taken.)
 
  • #1,636
Jonbenet wasn't taken from her home though, which makes this an entirely different crime.

Its not an abduction.

No, not an abduction at all, worse, it was an intruder, who trespassed into their home for hours and hours while the Ramsey's were out, and was lurking and hiding after the Ramsey's returned home.

What this intruder did was worse than abducting their child and taking her away from their home to rape and murder her- he raped her (with an object) in her very own home while the rest of her family slept safely (in their minds) and soundly. He tied her up in her own home, while her parents and brother slept, bludgeoned and strangled her to death while they slept and then slipped back out of the home, just as he had apparently slipped in! He wandered around and left a note mere yards from the rest of the family, sat in the kitchen and fed her pineapple from her own refrigerator! I can think of nothing worse... and I could never forgive myself for sleeping through it. I could never get over the idea that at sometime during the night, if anything- a thought, bad dream, or feeling had awakened me or anyone else we may have been able to save her.

As a mother, I would be afraid for the rest of my life, in my own home, until the monster was caught- and probably even then, forever after.
 
  • #1,637
Patsy Ramsey in 2000:

6 MR. WOOD: Everybody ready? I
7 don't know what you all decided, but I have
8 spoken with John and Patsy. It was your
9 condition, Chief and Mr. Kane, that Patsy
10 Ramsey be finished first before John Ramsey
11 was interviewed. It is my understanding that
12 you've got a number of areas to inquire of
13 Patsy Ramsey. She is here, and we are
14 prepared to go forward and complete her,
15 understanding that the fiber issue is one
16 that we would, although you say you have
17 made your decision, I would urge to you
18 reflect upon it, perhaps reconsider it.
19 But we are here for any and all
20 other areas, but in all fairness to my
21 clients, after you imposed this condition, I
22 think it is proper that you finish with
23 Patsy Ramsey before you do John Ramsey. And
24 if you are unwilling to do that, then
25 unfortunately your decision will end this
0263
1 day. So I will ask John to step out. I
2 will let Patsy finish. It's your call.
3 CHIEF BECKNER: If you have no
4 other questions, then you have no other
5 questions.
6 MR. WOOD: If you are willing to
7 stipulate that you had no further questions
8 beyond the security and the fibers that we've
9 already talked about ad nauseam, pardon my
10 language, I think that is probably accurate,
11 then John can go forward, but if you are
12 telling me you have other questions, but for
13 the reasons you've stated you are not going
14 to ask them today, then we are done because
15 I am going to insist that you live up to
16 your demand that Patsy go first and be
17 finished. I am not going to change my
18 position about my right to defend my clients
19 in what I think is a very clear
20 understanding of what we agreed to do at
21 your request.
22 MR. KANE: Given what I --
23 MR. WOOD: It is your call.
24 MR. KANE: -- said about the
25 parameters that you placed on it, I don't
0264
1 have any further questions.
2 MR. LEVIN: And I am in the same
3 position.
4 MR. WOOD: But you acknowledge,
5 absent my parameters, you have other areas
6 for Patsy.
7 MR. KANE: Yes.
8 MR. WOOD: Well, she's here.
9 We'll sit here for you to ask questions.
10 MR. KANE: Okay. Well, then let
11 me ask you this, are you going to raise
12 those objections?
13 MR. WOOD: I am going to continue
14 to make sure that we play by the rules you
15 all established, yes, sir.
16 MR. KANE: I mean, we are back
17 into the debate.
18 CHIEF BECKNER: Now that is not
19 fair if you say, based on those parameters
20 they don't have any further questions. I
21 don't know how it can be fair then to say,
22 well, go ahead and ask those questions
23 because you have parameters of what you are
24 going to let her answer.
25 MR. WOOD: I have not. That is
0265
1 not true. The only thing that I have told
2 you that we will not answer today are the
3 issues of the fiber based on what I think
4 are potentially mischaracterizations of
5 laboratory results that I would like to have
6 verified just by the result itself so that
7 we could then know exactly what facts we are
8 testifying to as opposed to speculation on
9 issues that may be hypothetical and not based
10 in fact. And that's it. You won't find
11 where I've instructed her not to answer
12 another question.
13 So she is here. We are prepared
14 to go forward. You all insisted that there
15 was some mystical, magical reason that she
16 had to be finished before John could done,
17 and if you didn't finish her you didn't want
18 John. You either are going to do what you
19 said you're going to do, gentlemen, or we
20 are done.
21 CHIEF BECKNER: I don't know
22 where we ever said that.
23 MR. WOOD: Let me just say
24 this --
25 MR. WOOD: You said it was a
0266
1 deal breaker, Patsy would go first or you
2 wouldn't take John --
3 MR. KANE: This is a just a
4 tennis game.
5 MR. WOOD: We assumed you
6 wanted --
7 CHIEF BECKNER: You assumed, but
8 you are stating as though there were some
9 statement somebody said that --
10 MR. WOOD: Were you telling me
11 you just wanted to start with her but not
12 finish before you started John?
13 CHIEF BECKNER: I didn't say
14 that.
15 MR. WOOD: Don't you think it is
16 a reasonable assumption, when you insist on
17 her going first, that I would have assumed
18 you were going to finish her before you did
19 John?
20 CHIEF BECKNER: Not necessarily.
21 MR. WOOD: Well, you changed --
22 CHIEF BECKNER: -- ask her some
23 additional questions.
24 MR. WOOD: You can have John and
25 Patsy back in an ongoing dialogue if we
0267
1 weren't involved in this kind of stuff. But
2 this stuff is not going to be productive.
3 It is unfortunate, but as they say, it --
4 look, I do not believe that I ever agreed or
5 you requested that Patsy start, not finish,
6 John come back, Patsy come back. I don't
7 think it ever was going to be a ping pong
8 match with these people coming back and
9 forth.
10 I thought it was clear you wanted
11 her first or you wouldn't talk to either
12 one. I think it was a reasonable assumption
13 on my part that meant you would finish her
14 back to back as you called it, and then we
15 would move on with John.
16 Now you're telling me that's not
17 necessarily the case, then I really am
18 concerned about whether we can agree on
19 anything in terms of what you mean when you
20 talk plain and simple English. That is not
21 meant to be defensive.
22 CHIEF BECKNER: You said it was a
23 condition. That was never a condition.
24 MR. WOOD: It wasn't. It was an
25 assumption on my part, when you said you
0268
1 wanted Patsy first, that we would finish her
2 and go back to back with John. I don't
3 think it was an unreasonable assumption on my
4 part.
5 But the point is, she is here,
6 you have got, as you say, Mr. Kane, a murder
7 you want to try to solve. You've all
8 represented that you need to ask her
9 questions. She may not be able to answer
10 all of them because I may feel like that
11 there are areas where I am not comfortable,
12 for legitimate reasons in my mind, we may
13 not reach agreement on the legitimacy of
14 those. I am comfortable with what I have
15 done so far. If you don't want the other
16 part, then just say so.
17 MR. KANE: I am not going to say
18 a word, Mr. Wood, because every time I say a
19 word, I hear a ten-minute speech.
20 MR. WOOD: Well, then I think
21 your characterization shows your lack of
22 objectivity. Do you want to ask questions
23 or not? Let's go. If you want to ask
24 them, ask the next question.
25 MR. KANE: Is Mr. Ramsey going to
0269
1 step out?
2 MR. WOOD: All right.
3 (Mr. Ramsey leaves the room. )
4 MR. WOOD: Ready to go?
5 MR. KANE: I am ready.
6 Q. (By Mr. Kane) Mrs. Ramsey, the
7 last question I asked you was, you had this
8 concern about Burke and this killer and the
9 potential that he could be harmed, and in
10 spite of concerns by your security people,
11 you had him transported to and from the
12 school by Susan Stein. Did Ms. Stein have
13 any kind of training in self-defense, to your
14 knowledge?
15 A. I don't know.
16 Q. Does she have any kind of
17 training in taking evasive maneuvers if
18 someone were to try to get into her car at
19 a stop sign or anything like that?
20 A. I don't know if she had any
21 formal training in that.
22 Q. Was there a discussion, when you
23 talked about security issues with either
24 Tracy Temple or with Ellis Armistead, were
25 you privy to discussions about the potential
0270
1 for harm to come to Burke while being
2 transported to or from school?
3 A. No.
4 Q. And in your recollection, that
5 never came up as an issue? Is that what
6 you are saying?
7 A. No.
8 Q. No, it didn't come up or --
9 A. I was unaware if it ever came up.
10 Q. Okay. When I asked you about
11 what it was that you had in mind in setting
12 up a security system, I take it that you
13 thought somebody could come into the school
14 and do harm to Burke inside the school; is
15 that correct?
16 A. Correct.
17 Q. Okay. The --
18 A. That's inconclusive of media as
19 well.
20 Q. Oh, okay. But was it more media
21 than the killer?
22 A. Well, it was all of those. You
23 know, the media would alert -- their presence
24 there would alert everyone that Burke was at
25 the school, so I wasn't crazy about them
0271
1 hanging around the school. Of course, the
2 killer was still out there; although, we had
3 been advised that he probably would not, you
4 know, come out because now everybody is
5 alerted and looking for him.
6 You know, and then there is what
7 they call copy cat people, you know, who
8 want to get a piece of the publicity, and
9 they would be lurking around.
10 Q. And who was it who gave you this
11 advice that the killer would probably not
12 want to come back?
13 A. John Douglas.
14 Q. Okay. And did Mr. Douglas tell
15 you that -- or what did he tell you?
16 A. Well, he said we had to be aware
17 of three situations. One, obviously the
18 killer was at large; two, what you call a
19 copy cat killer, somebody that says, oh, that
20 looks like an interesting idea, I think I
21 will try to do the same thing; and, three,
22 what he termed vigilante perpetrators or
23 whatever term you want to use for them. You
24 know, somebody that says, oh, you know, the
25 police aren't taking care of this, I will
0272
1 take care of it.
2 In other words, just alerting us
3 that there are a lot of crazy people out
4 there.
5 Q. And the first, so the first
6 concern he said was that it was probably
7 unlikely that the killer would come back, the
8 person that perpetrated the crime; is that
9 what he said?
10 A. He said it was very unlikely.
11 Q. Okay. But how about the copy cat
12 killer, what kind of opinion did he offer
13 about the potential for that?
14 A. He said it was very great.
15 Q. And this would be somebody who
16 would try to pattern what had already
17 happened to JonBenet, to do the same thing
18 to Burke?
19 A. Uh-huh (affirmative). Right.
20 MR. LEVIN: Can I interrupt you
21 just a second, Mike? I am sorry.
22 MR. KANE: Yes.
23 Q. (By Mr. Levin) Mrs. Ramsey, as I
24 understand it, at this point in time, which
25 would be early 1997, your belief was that
0273
1 the murder of your daughter was an act of
2 retaliation for some unknown reason towards
3 either you or your husband?
4 A. Right.
5 Q. You no longer hold that belief;
6 correct?
7 A. Not necessarily.
8 Q. I was under the impression that,
9 in your book, you stated you thought it was
10 a pedophile.
11 A. Well, it could be one in the
12 same.
13 Q. I see.
14 MR. LEVIN: Thank you, ma'am.
15 Q. (By Mr. Kane) In the third, the
16 vigilante, what was Mr. Douglas' opinion
17 about the probability or possibility about
18 somebody feeling that the authorities weren't
19 getting to the bottom of this so that they
20 would do harm?
21 A. Uh-huh (indicating affirmatively).
22 Q. What was his opinion about how
23 strong of a threat that was?
24 A. He just thought it was very
25 strong because, in his years of experience,
0274
1 there are lots of those kinds of strange
2 people out there.
3 Q. Did he talk to you about where
4 your copy cat killer or vigilante might
5 strike and where you should be careful?
6 A. No.
7 Q. But you thought that school was
8 certainly one of the places that a person
9 could come in?
10 A. Well, since that's where Burke
11 spent the greatest part of his day.
12 Q. Okay.
13 A. You know, I'm the mother of a
14 murdered child. I was fearful, just fearful
15 of everything. Most particularly about my
16 child, my husband, and myself.
17 Q. Okay. And, I mean, did you have
18 discussions either with Mr. Douglas or with
19 Ellis Armistead or any of the other security
20 people that you had, had you had discussions
21 with them about how somebody might pose a
22 threat to Burke while he was in school?
23 A. Not specifically.
24 Q. Did you have any kind of security
25 on Burke outside of school?
0275
1 A. Well, he was with us all the
2 time. You know, he was pretty much in a
3 protected environment other than the time he
4 was in school.
5 Q. When you say a protected
6 environment, other than the fact that his
7 parents were there, was there any protection
8 afforded to him outside of school? You
9 hired Tracy Temple, obviously, who was a
10 trained martial arts person, I believe.
11 A. Yeah. Well, we had, you know,
12 for many days, we had security people, you
13 know, with us at the homes where we were
14 staying for quite some time.
15 Q. Where, which homes?
16 A. Jay Olowski's. I know we had
17 somebody there then. And I believe there
18 might have been someone when we were at Mike
19 Bienam's house.
20 Q. Who were these people? Who were
21 the security people?
22 A. Somebody Ellis's group sent.
23 Q. So Ellis Armistead hired somebody
24 to be at Jay Olowski's house?
25 A. Yes.
0276
1 Q. Did they stay in the house or
2 outside the house?
3 A. Inside.
4 Q. Inside the house?
5 A. Mostly at night.
6 Q. And you moved into Mike Bienam's
7 house at some point?
8 A. Uh-huh (affirmative).
9 Q. Was that after Jay Olowski?
10 A. No. That was before.
11 Q. Okay. And then how about the
12 Stein's, did you have anybody there?
13 A. I can't remember. I don't think
14 we did as much. We may have for a few
15 days when we first got there.
16 Q. The people, the security people
17 that were hired while you were at Mike
18 Bienam's, let me -- how long did you stay at
19 Bienam's after?
20 A. My memory is real fuzzy with
21 those days, but -- I can't remember that. A
22 few days. Maybe a week or something.
23 Q. And then you went to Jay
24 Olowski's?
25 A. Right.
0277
1 Q. And you were there for a month or
2 so?
3 A. A couple of months, right.
4 Q. And then you went to the Stein's?
5 A. Right.
6 Q. And this person or these people,
7 how many -- was it one person that you had
8 as security at Jay Olowski's or was it a
9 series of people?
10 A. It might be different people.
11 Q. Was this 24 hour a day coverage?
12 A. No. It was mostly at night.
13 Q. And you say they were inside?
14 They were hired to be inside the house?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. For the whole time that you
17 stayed at Jay Olowski's house?
18 A. I don't remember. I don't know
19 if it was the whole time.
20 Q. Did these people -- this security,
21 you don't remember who it was?
22 A. No.
23 Q. Did they have any -- did you
24 discuss with them transporting Burke to
25 school?
0278
1 A. No.
2 Q. Did you discuss with anybody
3 having a professional security person
4 transport Burke to school?
5 A. I don't know. John may have. I
6 don't know.
7 Q. How about you, though? You were
8 involved in discussions with the school and
9 with the school district and with the
10 principal, I believe, is that correct, about
11 security arrangements while Burke was in
12 school?
13 A. I think so, yes. I mean, part
14 of the concern was I wanted him protected,
15 but at the same time I didn't want him made
16 paranoid, you know. And he didn't want -- I
17 didn't want him -- he didn't like Tracy
18 Temple being there. He said, mom, why is
19 this woman watching me all the time, and he
20 knew the kids knew that she was watching.
21 And so I am trying to walk a
22 fine line to keep me happy and peace of mind
23 about the security of my child, at the same
24 time not making him overly paranoid. So
25 the, you know, the best situation that we
0279
1 could come up with that was satisfactory to
2 both John and me was that he would be, you
3 know, picked up by Susan Stein. She began
4 taking him to school when we were at the
5 Olowski's. She would take him, and I
6 believe at that time nobody really knew where
7 we were. And he would duck down, you know,
8 and she would get him to the school and that
9 kind of thing.
10 Q. So you made a conscious decision
11 then not to have security --
12 A. In the transport.
13 Q. -- because Burke didn't feel
14 comfortable having security; is that what you
15 --
16 A. Right. He was, you know, he
17 was --
18 MR. WOOD: You are talking about
19 the lady Temple?
20 Q. (By Mr. Kane) No. You said
21 that --
22 A. Well, Susan, you know -- see, we
23 were -- the objective was to try to give him
24 as much normalcy as possible, but at the
25 same time putting, you know, security,
0280
1 security measures in place that would, you
2 know, ensure his security.
3 Q. Why was the decision made to have
4 the security inside the classroom versus to
5 and from school?
6 A. Well, because -- and she -- I
7 don't believe Tracy was inside the classroom.
8 I think she was standing in the hall like
9 near close to the front doors so she could
10 kind of be watching doors.
11 Q. Well, inside the school proper.
12 A. Yeah.
13 Q. Why was the decision made, as you
14 said --
15 A. Well, it was much more of an
16 uncontrolled environment. I mean, when you
17 go from a locked garage to locked car to,
18 you know, adult escort into the classroom,
19 you know, that's pretty safe.
20 Q. Is that what was represented to
21 you, was that it was more secure -- it was
22 more unsecure inside the school than it was
23 going to and from school?
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. And who represented that to you?
0281
1 Who told you that? I mean, when you say
2 that, let me ask it this way.
3 When you say that was represented
4 to you, was this represented to you by a
5 security consultant or Tracy Temple or Ellis
6 Armistead?
7 A. I don't remember. You know, I
8 just remember saying that I wanted somebody
9 at the school watching, you know. And at
10 first, you know, we put Tracy Temple there,
11 and then, you know, Burke was bothered by
12 her being there, the children didn't know who
13 she was, and the school said, you know, this
14 is kind of becoming disruptive.
15 And I said, well, you know, if
16 there is nobody there, he's coming out. And
17 then is when Susan and Roxy Walker got
18 together with the principal, I believe, and
19 said, you know, could we set up what they
20 call a Burke watch.
21 And they had a team of volunteer
22 parents, all of whom I knew, who volunteered
23 around the clock to be right at the door,
24 right outside the door of his fourth grade
25 classroom.
0282
1 And if he went to the bathroom or
2 somewhere, somebody would (indicating), you
3 know, without being right on his back, but
4 they were watching.
5 Q. And what were they expected to do
6 if somebody came into the school and tried
7 to harm Burke?
8 A. The first thing was to punch that
9 Lavalier, and call 911 and start screaming.
10 Q. And then what were they expected
11 to do after doing this, while the 911
12 response came in?
13 A. I don't know --
14 MR. WOOD: I don't want to stir
15 this up, but, you know, you guys got all the
16 meat off this chicken you are going to get.
17 Come on, move on to something else. I am
18 sitting here listening. You know, this is
19 just absurd. This doesn't have anything to
20 do with JonBenet's murder.
21 MR. KANE: Are you asking her not
22 to answer the question?
23 MR. WOOD: I am asking you to
24 move on to something productive. You just
25 beat this one to death, man. Let's go.
0283
1 THE WITNESS: I don't know what
2 they were supposed to do. They were
3 supposed to be there as a pair of eyes on
4 him and at a, you know, at an arm's length
5 without disrupting him, necessarily, but
6 keeping him as safe as possible.
 
  • #1,638
No, not an abduction at all, worse, it was an intruder, who trespassed into their home for hours and hours while the Ramsey's were out, and was lurking and hiding after the Ramsey's returned home.

What this intruder did was worse than abducting their child and taking her away from their home to rape and murder her- he raped her (with an object) in her very own home while the rest of her family slept safely (in their minds) and soundly. He tied her up in her own home, while her parents and brother slept, bludgeoned and strangled her to death while they slept and then slipped back out of the home, just as he had apparently slipped in! He wandered around and left a note mere yards from the rest of the family, sat in the kitchen and fed her pineapple from her own refrigerator! I can think of nothing worse... and I could never forgive myself for sleeping through it. I could never get over the idea that at sometime during the night, if anything- a thought, bad dream, or feeling had awakened me or anyone else we may have been able to save her.

As a mother, I would be afraid for the rest of my life, in my own home, until the monster was caught- and probably even then, forever after.

Oh my gosh.

Mary Lacey has a lot to answer for....

Can you think of any precedent, ever? Indeed, any repeat crime by either your "perp" or anyone else for that matter?

Jonbenet should have been the safest child in the world statistically speaking.

Statistics also indicate she died at the hands of someone close to her.

How do do you accept coincidence upon coincidence upon random singular event, and come up with The Least Likely Explanation?

Seriously, how does that work? What about the ransom note, the nonexistent ransom call, the parents refusal to cooperate?

How do you reconcile this? I cant!
 
  • #1,639
Jonbenet wasn't taken from her home though, which makes this an entirely different crime.



Its not an abduction.


Right.
John Ramsey wasn't hyper vigilant because he knows exactly what happened and he knows there was no intruder. IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #1,640
I can't either. JonBenet deserved so much better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
1,430
Total visitors
1,572

Forum statistics

Threads
632,304
Messages
18,624,542
Members
243,083
Latest member
adorablemud
Back
Top