But why does the DNA testing have anything to do in this neglect case? The term cart before the horse comes to mind....
Most here agree it isn't relevant, the mere fact that Caylee was gone for 30+ days and her mother had no idea where she was and no intention of notifying the authorities prior to CA calling it in SHOULD serve as evidence enough of the neglect. I agree with all who've posted that the defense is jumping the gun, but the judge is likely to let them, since we all know what's coming down the potential pipeline next week when the GJ convenes to consider this matter and, in all honesty, a few extra days/week doesn't really make that much difference at this stage in the proceedings.