sandcastles4me
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 356
- Reaction score
- 0
Thanks SC4mee
That sucks!!!!
Well if he does okay her freedom atleast it won't be until Monday and possibly by Tuesday she could be charged with Murder!
Thanks SC4mee
That sucks!!!!
My problem with your statement is that JB never said the purpose was for KC to help search for Caylee. The field trips are to assist with her defense-period.
To me, that speaks volumes.
That is very true. My kids still have school, but I believe the government offices have it off.Isn't Monday a federal holiday Columbus day
We, well, I disklike JB so much because it is evident to me, with a legal assistant degree, that he doesn't know what the jack he's doing! He's all bluster. Even a lowly la knows it's a good idea to cite the law when you need it to argue a motion. Even a lowly la knows a good attorney doesn't stroll (he must have picked that up from KC) up to the judge with one hand in your pocket and a big stupid grin on your face.
Watching him can't even be compared to watching a train wreck..watching a train wreck should induce at least a little sympathy for the sight before your eyes. Watching JB is torure...cringe-worthy torture! Thank God the prosecution side of the bar was so prepared, professsional and on task. They were balm to my ears and eyes.
I don't know when to start the pool that bets when KC is convicted of anything that she'll start screaming "ineffective counsel"! JB couldn't be that smart, could he???
Are you an attorney? Do you understand all the intracacies of the law and this case in particular?
I'm just wondering, not being argumentative.
It seems to me, reading the many posts here that JB is being judged for being a defense attorney and not really on his abilities.
I think it really doesn't matter what he does or says, he is going to be called out for it and I'm not sure that is fair. We are all entitled to a defense. JB is correct in that KC has been tried for murder before the public before she has even been charged. The public appears to have access to information, through the Sunshine Act, before the defense is made aware of it. Makes it difficult to prepare your case when you can not even get the charges clarified.
I am in no way defending KC. I think she is guilty plus some. But I think the attacks on JB are out of line to a large extent.
Just my opinion,
Salem
THANKS for pointing that out to me - I hadn't noticed it whatsoever and I agree with you on its calculated intent/effect.SNIPPED:"...I found it somewhat amusing that tradition was broken regarding where the audience sits.
Usually it plays out like a "friends of the bride/friends of the groom" :cake: arrangement, with LE behind the prosecution...on their side.
OCSO was seated behind Baez's table, though. They were staring with arms folded. :cop::detective::nono:
Traditionally, they would sit behind the prosecution table.
I believe this was a calculated move to intimidate Atty Baez"
jmho
I dont think anyone is judging him because he's a defense attorney. He's being judged because he stammers, doesn't make any sense and has totally misguided this family.
It seems to me, reading the many posts here that JB is being judged for being a defense attorney and not really on his abilities
JB has a computer the same as we do. We pour over the documents day and night. He could do the same. What charges were not clarified?
The man was ill prepared. He knew it. The judge knew it. TruTV knew it. The State Atty's knew it. JB is the one that requested these motions to be heard, he should have brought case law with him to back up his request. He didn't do it. The judge IMHO was generous with him.
THANKS for pointing that out to me - I hadn't noticed it whatsoever and I agree with you on its calculated intent/effect.
All I will divulge in a backwards sort of way is that I have worked in the legal field for many moons and yes, I do know a little about the law.
I've said this over and over, HE'S INCOMPETENT FOR THIS LEVEL OF A CASE. He may okay to draw up a will, estate planning, probate, but would never cut in the big city Dallas trial world that I live in.
Yes, she's entitled to a defense. Was Caylee??
SNIPPED:"... In regards to requesting Casey have the ability to search for her daughter: I think there was a two-fold purpose for this motion. One- the public has been asking "Why isn't Casey helping in the search for Caylee?" I think that this motion makes it clear to the public that she can not physically go and search for her daughter at this time. Just making the motion in itself speaks volumes. Two-if the motion is granted, then it will allow Casey (In Baez's eyes) to assist with the search of her daughter with the information that she and Baez have (the info that she has withheld from the police). If the motion is denied- she can't be judged for not searching because of the physical restraints of her bond agreement. JMO
it's actually Casey's fault that the fed's are involved. She claimed the child was kidnapped by the nanny and taken out of state, maybe to NY, NJ or PR. Kidnapping across state lines gets the fed's involved. And once involved they do not get uninvolved.
Is there any particular reason that Baez hasn't been conducting depositions all along?
I noticed the judge told him several times to go out and depose people in order to get the information he was seeking.
This girl is scheduled for trial in a month. Baez has been her attorney since July. Why hasn't he been prepping his case?
What happened with the motion to seal the records that was brought up first? Did the judge allow that?
Part 1 of hearing
http://www.wftv.com/video/17687549/index.html