Do you happen to know the process of cancelling a certificate? How long it takes, etc? Do we know there isn't a notification period of some kind? In any case, for an operation on which the company had already spent so much money, and was committed to run a certain type of business on a specified piece of land, and had already hired people to be in place, and I would have to assume they were likely already sending their people for specific training/certification, and a company who had gone through the large process of acquiring said certification, it's a huge deal, and it was still fast, even if it wasn't requested until February. In my humble opinion however, I would guess that the cancellation process might also take some time in itself.
The important acronyms:
MRO: Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul
AMO: Aircraft Maintenance Organizations
A MRO is an extension of an AMO. The occupancy permit for the hangar was in February/12. At that point the search would have been on for qualified maintenance people. The MRO is much more specific and would have be directly related to the type of aircraft that WM wanted to attract. These facilities are not your normal auto garage- they're extremely highly regulated. February to November 1 seems like a long time, but in the world of Transport Canada it's simply the length of time it takes.
Millardair may have already had their AMO, but getting the necessary permissions from TC to work on specific aircraft would have required jumping thru a lot of hoops along with getting experienced AME on board. In November/12, WM got permission for Maintenance,Repair & Overhaul on the aircraft he wanted to base his business on. At that point, it should have been full steam ahead...but alas, the hangar looked more like a man cave than a pristine maintenance facility. AS made a reasonable request to DM: get your stuff out of the hangar so we can solidify some of these contracts.
But, Millardair had another problem. It had signed a 50 year lease with Waterloo to run an AMO/MRO out of it's hangar. The airport had even invested taxpayers money into the project. This is precisely why I find DM's actions of laying everyone off and shutting the doors so absolutely bizarre. These wouldn't have been your run of the mill employees. I'm including below the requirements: an AMO & the MRO certification would have required highly trained personnel as well.
IMHO, the Airport Manager would have called their solicitors the minute he got word that WM was dead and Millardair had shut down. At that point Millardairs lawyers and perhaps their banker would have gotten involved-perhaps even move into damage control. The reasonable, sane solution would have been to find someone to take over the whole thing. IMHO, the damage was already done and Millardair no longer had the personnel available to fulfill the requirements of the AMO/MRO. Transport Canada would have been trying to work with them, but without key people in place, they would have no option but to cancel the certificates- IIRC, there's a 90 grace period- but I'll have to verify- maybe Arnie M can help with this??. MOO
573.04 Person Responsible for Maintenance
(1) The person responsible for maintenance appointed under paragraph 573.03(1)(a) of the Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) shall have acquired
a minimum of[B] six years experience in the performance or direct supervision of maintenance activities of the type undertaken by the organization, at least six months of which have been obtained within the preceding two years.[/B]
(amended 2005/05/31; previous version)
(2) An applicant for the "Person Responsible for Maintenance" position within an AMO shall demonstrate,
during an interview to be conducted by Transport Canada regional personnel, that he or she is knowledgeable in respect of the AMO’s policies approved by the Minister, and the topics below:
(amended 2005/05/31; previous version)
(a) duties and responsibilities of the appointed position;
(b) duties of persons who have been assigned functional responsibilities;
(c) responsibilities of the AMO in relation to those of the operator;
(d) responsibilities of the AMO for work that has been contracted out;
(e) responsibilities of ACA/SCA holders in relation to those of the AMO;
(f) the function of Quality Assurance;
(g) maintenance release requirements;
(h) record keeping requirements;
(i) identification of acceptable reference data for repairs and modifications;
(j) parts control and traceability; and
(k) control of non conforming parts and materials