SapphireSteel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 6,788
- Reaction score
- 113
There has never been any proof of the fund being used to cover legal expenses in libel trials or on the mccanns own legal expenses. The fund is a not for profit comapny (it would be illegal in england for it to become a charity), with no shareholders etc.
If something is held to be libelous then it is untrue, so stopping the flow of untrue information is not unhelpful. If people feel they can prove their claims then they have nothing to worry about when it comes to being accused of libel. The justice system that decides if something is untrue or nto is the same one that decides guilt of murder etc, so what is the problem?
One reason why the Mccanns have had to take these actions themselves is because this occurred in Portugal they are not protected by contempt of court laws like they would have been had madeleine disappeared in the UK. If she had disappeared in the UK the papers would have likely been held for contempt of court for printing the material they did i.e police leaks. This is what happened with Joanna Yeates landlord when he was questione dby the police on suspicion fo her murder. Not only did he win libel payouts and was a participant in the leveson inquiry the papers were found guilty of contempt of court. In the Uk there are very strict rules about what can and cannot be printed about a person in this situation.
carter-ruck were not paid by the fund and no proof has been shown to demonstrate that lawyers have been employed for anything other than the funds own legal needs -i.e setting it up.
But this particular Mark warner resort did not have the listening service because the resort was spread around the village so would take too long for a nanny to do a circuit. But they offered it at most other resorts which were more campus style. So you can see why if some of the group had used it in Greece they would think running their own listening service was OK, why would it be OK in greece but not in PDl, a sleepy little village?
I think the way people have been trying to make money from the disappearence is low. There is not one of them with any credibility (convicted criminal etc), yet there they are breaking into private property, digging up sacred areas, harressing the mccanns all on the back of nothing. What did they plan to do if they actually dug up a body - they would already have contaminated the scene and made any evidence found be held in doubt? They would ahve got into trouble with the police if they got caught, one cannot go digging up public land, or go onto private property without permission.
If these people truely believe they have information then they should go to the police. In fairness bennett has apparently done this, but the british police have said they believe it was a stranger abduction and that there is a chance madeleine is still alive.
I think the reason Madeleine was targeted was simply the position of the flat, back in 2007 it was dimly lit (as was the surrounding area) surrounded by foliage, and was the nearest flat to the street. Plus like the others the window and back door backed onto an empty car park. Someone could have come in either the window (which could be opened from the outside, reporters got caught trying to break in this way apparently), or even the patio doors. It was an area full of strangers, many of them carrying children back from the creche, who would normally notice one more. I also do not think it can be discounted someone had managed to get hold of keys. these places have numerous people staying in them, numerous people working on them requiring master keys, it is easy for one to get misplaced, illegally copied etc. I wonder if that was ever looked in to.
There was no need to look into master keys, as the McCanns left the doors unlocked.
PDL was an extremely quiet, sleepy fishing town. Cars were unusual and
largely unnecessary. At that time of the evening, a car starting up would have alerted many sleeping tourists, locals, and strolling passers by.
People seem to believe that Goncalo Amaral is the only member of the Portugese LE. He is not, and the fact is often overlooked that the hunt for Madeleine was the most intense, expensive and thorough in Portugese history. An area of 200 square km was checked and rechecked, by dogs, foot patrol, helicopter, scanner, sea. No expense was spared. Borders were checked. Passports were checked. Cars were searched. RSO's were searched. They pulled apart Robert Murat's life from top to bottom. Millions of dollars and man hours were expended (some would say wasted) in the search for this little girl. They were not some bumbling bunch of fools tripping over one another and their own shoelaces.
Further, British police were involved almost from ground zero. British Police who closely worked with the PDJ, and were summarily dismissed and sent home in disgrace by their own government once they themselves began to believe an "abduction" was the LEAST likely explanation for Madeleine's disappearance.
The PDL suffered British governmental pressure from day one in this case. At no stage were they allowed to investigate, question, form theories, and follow those theories through to their natural conclusion of arrest and prosecution.
The Fund has absolutely paid for a staggering list of "professionals" who have individually and collectively profitted from Madeleine's disappearance. If you or I lost our child, we would naturally receive donations from well wishers. We would probably set up a bank account for those, and appoint trustees to administer those accounts, to carefully and transparently use them ONLY to find our child. This has not happened with the McCanns, who chose to set up a private company shrouded in secrecy, appoint friends and relatives to the board of directors, make themselves and their friends families and supporters beneficiaries. They could easily have achieved tax free status as a charity but that would mean they would have to have transparancy.
Transparency is the enemy of the McCann.