This is exactly why I don't like SSI determinations until age 22. Sure, give presumptive eligibility, and no one has any expectations or incentives to gain skills for work. Parents actually discourage skill improvements, as they don't want them to lose benefits.Was he a sovereign citizen when he was on SSI?
Brooks wrote to the jurist that he had mental health issues for which he received S.S.I. benefits, presumably referring to Supplemental Security Income. He had received these benefits since he was a child and "was deemed disabled by the Federal Government," he wrote.
"The reason my benefits were stopped, was because I was getting incarcerated," he continued. "My benefits were scheduled to start back up in May of last year, at which time I would have been able to pay my support. This did not happen because I was incarcerated from Feb. – May 31st of last year."
![]()
Waukesha suspect Darrell Brooks told judge he couldn't pay child support because he ‘was getting incarcerated'
Waukesha Christmas parade suspect Darrell Brooks Jr. divulged details of his life, criticized the mother of one of his children and implied that he was unable to pay child support because he kept “getting incarcerated” in a letter sent to a Wisconsin judge in 2011 pertaining to one of the...www.foxnews.com
Yes!Wow prosecutor and judge have both had ENOUGH! Judge is being more firm with him! It’s about dang time! This is the attitude she needed to take with him from Day 1!
Yeah. Sounds like his case will be “his filings”… aka his usual diatribe with each witness and outbursts in court.oh this is going to be REALLY REALLY bad.
he is very lucky no DP in WI as I honestly do not think he would have many if any mitigating factors. I am curious to see if his mother will show up at sentencing to ask for some consideration for her son for the claimed mental illness. I assume her life is pretty well done as how could a hospital employ her as a CNA or anything knowing the relationship. They are lucky he did not come to the hospital during that time he was out of prison. He has killer in his eyes...gun, knives or car...he would use anything. He will have no visitors.I watched a lawtuber review Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337... basis for how the judge can deal with this type of defendant. It was helpful to me. 'Just offering the info if anyone else is curious. I even learned a new word, "contumacious" although it's a bit archaic. lol
Regarding DB's verbal gaffs/mispronunciations... I have no regrets when poking fun as he chose to represent himself.
Also, I took the time to review some of the photos and read a bit about some of the parade victims - which doesn't even include those without visible injuries. He made choices. He's lucky he will continue to live. The victims had no choice.
all jmo
I’ve been wondering the same thing. I wonder if she can put him in the other room for the duration of the trial.I am amazed she continues to argue with him, but what are her choices? Wonder how another judge would deal with him.
Ugh, the judge and prosecutors must be dreading going over jury instructions with him prior to closings.I wonder if the state will add jury instructions to address his rantings.