FinallyRegistered
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,980
- Reaction score
- 17
I am neither defending police or victims, but I do have a question that has always bothered me about these cases. Why, when confronted by a possibly dangerous individual, do police respond with deadly force? Is there no way to de-escalate a situation without killing them? If it is truly a case of “my life or yours” —- can they not attempt to shoot to injure without causing death? Surely they don’t shoot wildly, so they must be making a conscious decision.
I understand these are not circumstances that may allow time to weigh the options, but deadly force should not be first, IMO
Good point. A gun shot to the foot would be much better than killing someone. So many options were available, now lives are ruined.