stillwatersc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,626
- Reaction score
- 890
I think this part is the most telling:
I think it's no accident that the phrase 'blood relative' was used, rather than simply 'relative'. Sure sounds like she thinks that someone in the family by marriage is responsible. Whether she means RL or someone else, of course, isn't clear.
I know that the vast majority of people who have been following this case think that LL did something to Aliayah, but I have never really seen anybody base that on anything other than a dislike for her personally and disapproval of the way she's conducted herself. For some, that might be enough to declare her a murderer, but not for me.
The thing that has me most curious is why LL thinks Aliayah's still alive. Is it because she just wants to think that as any mother would, or because she has a theory about what happened to her? I am thinking the latter, but time will tell.
I don't want to believe Lena is guilty but can't explain why she would get in the car and drive around for hours looking for a missing 3 year old and why the close neighbor who was outside all morning didn't see or hear any searching. If Lena's story was true, she & the other children should have been running up & down the street calling for Aliayah & the whole neighborhood would have been summoned immediately. The scenario Lena described is not logical.