I'm very bothered by the managers statement, not because I don't believe or do believe it. It just doesn't make sense to me that Gabby & BL walked out on their check. Then being chased by the waitress, paying the bill in the parking lot and Gabby returning to ask for a refund.
What bothers me is why they left without paying in the first place? That part doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I can only imagine why, but I can't imagine that Gabby & BL weren't upset, that just doesn't make sense to me and it's probably something that will never be clear to me.
I believe Gabby was upset and low and behold BL wasn't. Feels like the Moab stop all over again. Now we know for a fact that BL was able to control himself and his temper, like a light switch you can turn on and off.
Maybe it's just a guy thing, that I don't know. I know if I'm really worked up and upset I can't just switch it off and act like nothing ever happened. BL was able to do it twice in a matter of days. I believe he was behind not paying and then forcing Gabby to return for a refund while he waited outside. Did he actually get off on her pain? Was he really that cruel?
From Moonflower outside slapping and hitting Gabby to less than 10 minutes later acting as cool as a cucumber acting as if nothing had just happened. It's so bizarre to me and that's what makes no sense to me. Not that I expect BL to be wailing and crying, but the anger inside him that he could turn on and off. That's so scary to me that a person can do it like BL was able to do it. JMHO
Because we have two differing stories describing the "incident" at MPs on the 27th, I feel like it's impossible to determine what really happened. There are two common threads between these stories, however. One is that GP and BL left and then came back in. The number of times and such differs, but it appears they did it at least once. The second involves possible payment issues. As
@Allabouttrial posted last night, the IG woman even stated,
"We only took notice of them when they got up and were leaving. I'm almost positive that they were eating, because I remember questioning, "Did they even pay, did they even get the bill. Did they..."
I would guess, at the very minimum, the waitress would have been visibly upset had she seen them leaving without paying. That alone could have drawn some attention from nearby patrons.
I have to admit, the idea of them pulling a dine-and-dash would
not surprise me all that much. I'm not dogging on either of them, and of course I would never condone that kind of illegal activity, but
IMO, there are other possible hints of this behavior elsewhere in their story. 1) On GP's IG, there are a couple instances of doings we are not allowed to discuss on WS (legal in some states, illegal in others). 2)
IF they were indeed camping at Spread Creek, in the area she was found, they were camping (and having a fire) in an undesignated location, as well as parked in an undesignated parking spot. I know these are seemingly lesser infractions than walking out of a restaurant without paying, but my point is, do we truly know them enough to say GP would or would not dine-and-dash? Or BL? I would like to think not, but who knows?
But I'm also open to the idea that the MP "incident" was completely innocent on one or both sides. We just don't have enough information, imo.