Sorry - replying on phone and things are getting all sorts of messed up.
Okay....wasn’t even focused on town, just on date (18 vs 19)...now this Montezuma business I’m thinking must be a typo? I’m telling myself that so my mind doesn’t start wandering. Sorry for the glaring oversight on my part!
I think there was some discussion about the date* being “last seen,” but this is the first time I’ve seen it as being reported missing as of that date...again, might be semantics/typo?
I’m not sure if this has been posted or mentioned (and I definitely don’t know the backstory...ALSO, I don’t agree with this theory as applied to MT), but it gave me pause:
Ivan Crisostomo & Crystal Allen: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com
So question - on the link for missing persons, under incident type, there are three that stuck out to me: (1) Endangered/Physical; (2) Other adult missing; and (3) Involuntary Disappearance. Any idea why MT is listed as #2 "Other adult missing"?
Gotcha. When I looked at their site I saw something different, which gave me pause, but I can’t post due to TOS/just generally don’t want to put something out there that is unsubstantiated.
I have been wondering this too re the cameras. I know *nothing* about tech (can’t even get my new iPhone to sync with iCloud, but in my defense, the guy at the Genius Bar couldn’t either) but would the camera thing be under an “IT” purview?
(Edited to fix spelling of a word.)
Not a requirement that you be emancipated to be reported missing, but that someone asked about the rules in Iowa for reporting someone missing and I think the word emancipation was somewhere included (but wholly unrelated to this case)
I think it would just be under 2 or 3. LE have some discretion in determining the breadth of definition of “danger.” For example, someone suddenly unreachable and evidence points to a deviation in typical schedule could point to “danger,” i.e., that a person has so significantly deviated from...
With respect to WC, it may not be that they think he is involved, but that someone with whom he is associated/connected could have information or be involved. That way, kill two birds with one stone - see if WC can give you any information (someone’s whereabouts, etc.) while simultaneously...
Maybe those who are leaning more towards the “known” suspect camp can help me out here. I have no idea what happened (clearly) and am torn when thinking through all of the possible scenarios. However, what I can’t work out is why the stranger angle is being so discounted. Specifically, this...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.