Search results

He sold the domain, not the actual business. I think it speaks volumes that this lawyer is involved with the sale and contract. Maybe it's too soon to assume what he did was illegal. Wrong maybe, illegal, maybe not.

It's not even relevant. That's why the judge didn't allow it in. DK sold the biz well over a year later.

Damn, Maline looks hungover.

He starts out as explaining that he manufactures the waterfalls, he owns his own company, its all separate, then ends with "well, I do the lighting, someone else manufactures the waterfalls". Chase wasn't doing even nearly close to what he used to for Joseph and he was giving him minimal...

I was thinking the same, probably into the first week or two of May. Didn't they say they were planning on having the entire enterrogation (8 hours?) to play for the jury? And the whole CNN interview?

6210 Filkins Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 - realtor.com®

No you wouldn't allow this for someone who has a history of theft and went to jail for it. Even though Chase was making upwards of $170k a year, Joseph had to pay for Chase's rent and Cathy's car repairs because of Chase's gambling problem. On top of the fact Chase owed Joseph $42,845 and he...

A lot of ears in the cornfield, fruit to yield as well. Someone is trying to upset the apple cart. Ain't going to happen. Tick tock, Chase.

This sounds vaguely familiar of an old schizophrenic blog.

Ok you're right, it was the Queen Mary. With Merritt driving.

The prosecution doesn't need to provide an alibi for DK, or any other characters.

Delete

LOL!!!! ;)

She was also evicted from her apartment last year and had a judgement against her for about 3 months rent.

It could be that it was analyzed but no relevant information was obtained. It might have not been used after 2010.

This actually goes to the heart of the matter, the validity of what the evidence reflects. The IP address that the expert testified to, comes up with multiple locations, just as we explored. He couldn't explain it. But the subject of a VPN possibly being used was entertained. Dan could have...

That is not what I was implying. Dan and Chase's transgressions appear to be completely separate. For Dan, he saw an opportunity because Joseph appeared to not be there, for many months, to hold Dan accountable. So he did take advantage on some level. For Chase it was only a day since the...

Perhaps the prosecution didn't think the defense would focus on minute, irrelevant details, such as when Joseph called Chase 10 minutes or 40 minutes after he wrote a check for Chase. On top of that, not knowing the context of those calls. But the 'expert' witness inferred Joseph called him...

Well, the prosecution isn't going to go through every single piece of the investigation the detectives went through. Then we would be here for many, many months and the jury would have glossed over long before that.

Hmm, I don't know how it's possible to attempt to hide them from Dan when he was not a user on the account. But I hope the defense runs with that.