Search results

I would agree with you Bayareamom with above as the possible and simple explanation IF this size 12 panty would not have 'WEDNESDAY' on it! You see (and this is the fact), JonBenet cannot read yet. And Bloomy package was new with 7 panties for each day of the week inside. How JB would know which...

Just to make clear WHEN 'island of privacy'= sealed documents happened... http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/senate/6502/primer/primer5_ce.html

MM, No, you're correct. The FIRST, initial AR was available to Ramsey's camp in 1997. And Patsy LIED in her 1997 interview that she didn't read it. But 'chronic' abuse wasn't there yet!...Remember, it took Meyer and other experts a lot of time of discussion and meetings with BPD, FBI...

BINGO!!!! Darlene, otg and others who find it!!! Even if you didn't - it's OK...I kind of make you think and read and this is productive thing...agree?....'Repetition is Mother of Learning'!:seeya: Now, remember I told you how it's important to watch body landuage? Well, it's important to...

Thank you otg! But what about my surprize??!!! NOBODY find it yet...:what: I probably read and re-read these 'interviews' dozen times. And everytime, I find something 'new' to which I didn't pay attention before. Yesterday was this kind of 'WOW' moment....but nobody catched it yet to say...

Let's continue with another Interogation, for the same subject 'marker'. I used again some parts without BBM but please take time, read full interogation and pay attention to INTEROGATOR's style this time (Lou Smith versa Mike Kane) and how it defers from Patsy's interogation...

This thread is about 'who molested JonBenet?'. I'm sure everyone on this forum has been trying to find the answer to this question many times over. And sometimes our answers vary depends on what we belive at the moment. And we all should agree that the right answer to this question shoul solve...

Yes, exectly!...on JB's cheek. This round one, 'burn'-like, so called 'abrasion' by AR. Was it made by ring which Patsy used to wear with the stone inside her palm?; or by the botton from her jacket when JB was carry-on or straggled or strangled?...very much interesting to know the dimention and...

No pictures, only description, as much as I know. If we could see pictures from White's party - we could see her jacket. I'm very much interesting to see this jacket as well, but for different reason. My interests are in jacket's bottons and their location. jmo

First of all, WELCOME Bayareamom!!! and secondly, THANK YOU for such an excellent post! I have a question. How do you see the molestation part fits 'Patsy Did It' scenario? Again, welcome!!!!

Let's try to find reasonable explation for 'reasonable doubts'. 1. Test of other RED fibers (santa suit, turtleneck, jumpsuit...) - how do we know that all these items were NOT tested? - if these items were collected by LE, properly identifed and documented in the 'evidence collected' list...

UKGuy, How do you know that fibers from Santa Suit were there and WASN'T TESTED??? How do you know that? Maybe it was tested against all evidences LE had and match wasn't found, agree?...It was X-mas time and JB probably visited some stores with her parents...and maybe in some stores THE...

MM, I'm not in the 'pissing match' (forgive my language please) here in regards of fibers. What I'm trying to do is exectly what YOU've been asking others to do: don't shake the foundation of the prooven facts! This case is complicated 'as is', with many unknown factors/facts/evidences. If...

When I read in Kolar and ST books that fibers have been found on the tape, inside of rope's knot, on the blanket, in the tray AND were CONSISTENT WITH Patsy's jacket, I fully take this as an evidence/fact. For me, the 'consistent with' = match of (at the minimum!): - colors; - physical...

Well, Burke's bedroom photo was from LS presentation. I wouldn't assume that this particular bed was 'not the one he slept in'. Otherwise, what was the purpose to use it by LS?...Of course it's possible that you're correct but I don't believe it's probable...In addition, this particular bed is...

No, not really. It's the fact that AR we're reading on Internet today (including many resources like ARC and others) is not complete version. Which means that certain things were purposely omitted from the public eyes. Agree? Next, the toxicology analysis involved the tests of: - blood; -...

O dear! Of course I saw AR and saw these 'summary' lines!!! I'm talking about FULL SECTION of AR which must be done (or attached!!!!) SEPARATELY like it was done for example for 'internal', 'external' and 'microscopic' headings for EACH organ, not just blood!!!! jmo

Nope, you're wrong. By the medical standards, ME MUST enter/complete each section!!! The same way as he did with other sections in AR. If nothing found, ME must place the remarks like 'no...blabla...identified'...or 'not...remarkable'... In regards of BBM, you're correct, JB MIGHT not do...

For long time I've been asking myself: what part of the autopsy report wasn't published for public to see? WHICH portion(s) is/are kept in 'secret' drawer of LE and FBI and WHY? So, I start investigation:)...Here what I found...

Nom de plume, in another word you could believe that Patsy is innocent bystander, right?...well, it's matter of opinion of course...:waitasec: By the way, if Patsy such an innocent grieving mother then why she didn't dedicated her remaining life and financial resources toward FINDING THE...