I haven't finished reading the rest of the thread, so forgive me if I'm saying the same thing as lots of others but... bingo! Some things just clicked into place (in my head anyway). I think you're spot on - that was PRs plan when she wrote the note. The reference to the 'adequately sized...
And why wouldn't Patsy badger Priscilla to tell her everything she claims to know, rather than shut her down?? Why does Patsy even tell this story? it doesn't make her look like a parent desperate to know who killed her daughter.
TD
There are so many, but one that sticks out for me is Patsy stating that she had 'flashbacks' of JB screaming. You don't have flashbacks unless you were present when the action occurred.
I suspected this when I read that George and Cindy left court after the verdict without trying to talk to her.
I think they have grown closer over the past three years - not having KC around has demonstrated to them how disruptive to family life she was. And, unlike the jury, they know she...
This is my first visit back to WS since I read the news of the verdict. I have been just sick about this - they got it so wrong that I, who usually scoffs at conspiracy theories, found myself coming up with all sorts of bizarre creations to try to make it make sense to myself.
I hope those...
Heya Sammiejam, I'm in Oz as well, but having to work every day puts the kibosh on watching. I'm hoping also that there will be a 'summary' thread so that we who cannot watch can read the hihlights every day!
By the way - are you sure about 2.30? That means that court would only go for 4 1/4...
Have fun everyone (well, you know what I mean!). I'm off to bed - it's 10.20pm Tuesday evening here, so I'll look forward to catching up with the news in the morning. Thanks so much to everyone for posting what is happening for those of us who can't follow in rt.
I just don't get why ICA thinks a mistrial is a win - doesn't it mean that the trial process starts again? And she still will get convicted?
Or has JB insinuated that a mistrial equals going free?
All the prosecution has to do to overcome any 'overbearing/controlling CA" accustaions is to play the videos of the jail visits between CA/GA and ICA. No way that is a meek, bullied "little girl" and a domineering mother!
I haven't read through the whole thread, so I apologise if this has already been suggested - my theory is that KC expected and wanted the car to be stolen, so she could say that someone stole the car with Caylee in it (ie a car jacking). She left the bag as an inducement to would-be thieves to...
Now, I'm probably being dense, and I apologise in advance if I am but... how can Eikelenboom have submitted a report on touch DNA (which is supposedly his speciality) when the lab hasn't finished and JP has had to extend their dealine for a month?
To me, it seems like the '03 is an afterthought/later addition - if ICA had really just accidentally written the wrong date at the start of 2004, she would have written it in full, with decorations and swirls etc around it, as the start of her diary. To have an abbreviated year in the corner...
I worked out the defence strategy! Hubby and I have started watching The West Wing right from season one, and in one of the episodes tonight, Jed says that one of his professors told him: "If the law is on your side, argue the law. If the facts are on your side, argue the facts. If neither law...
The thing that stops me accepting an 'accident...duct tape to look like kidnapping' theory is the way the duct tape was placed. It wasn't applied the way you would to keep someone quiet - it was over Caylee's mouth and nose and stuck to her hair. It was obviously never going to be removed, and...
Wow! What a joy to read! And note that the SAO does not refer to "the victim" - Caylee's name appears everywhere. There's no way they will let anyone forget that little girl!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.