Search results

Aren’t the attorneys initials also SG? This makes it even more confusing…

I still don’t get how this screenshot proves anything? Are they just assuming because one of the accounts is no longer active that it must have been his?

Good thoughts. I was also thinking he turned around and made multiple attempts because the DD driver was making delivery? But wouldn’t there be video of DD coming and going? I assume?

I wasn’t implying that, I was simply stating all of these things don’t seem to add up or make sense. Therefore somewhere along the line it’s been misreported, whether in the 20/20 special or otherwise.

Right, but on 20/20 someone stated after the gas station footage was found they looked again at apartment footage and then found Hyundai in the area at the timeframe of murders. Just seemed odd.

What did the local gas station attendant say or how was he/she mistaken? I hadn’t heard of any statements from that person so I’m just curious now. So I guess you’re also saying the person in the 20/20 special was incorrectly speaking saying they found even MORE footage after the gas station...

And in that case, if they did… why did they wait until the gas attendant story before seeking information from the public on the Hyundai? I’m just confused on the whole Hyundai timeline.

I’m watching it streaming on Hulu on my TV so I can’t link it. But it is around 34 minutes in on the 20/20 special that aired last night. This is after the gas station attendant reported the Hyundai and they are describing the police seeking information on a Hyundai. The man says “then they go...

Something I just thought of while watching 20/20… why didn’t LE look at video surveillance from neighboring residences immediately? It looks like they didn’t look at it until after they received the call from the mobile gas station attendant, who had gone through her video and seen a white...

Well yeah, if that’s what he did. I’m just curious why it wasn’t mentioned at all either way in reports, and only pings were mentioned.

So if they can use GPS (when the phone was on obviously), then why even bother with the pings? Just curious.

So you’re saying all of those antennas would provide cell service/pings? Even the antenna at Kentucky fried chicken? But if we are counting antennas too, my non-urban college town has 277 towers, and 265 antennas for a total of 542. And Moscow only has 126? Seems like they are spread a bit...

I looked up the number of cell towers online for the town and it showed only 26 (including ones in Pullman), whereas the town i live in (not urban, but also a decent sized college town in the middle of Texas) and we have 277.

They don’t exactly live in a large urban area though?

But I think the towers cover miles and miles; not just an area close to the house. But I could be wrong.

You definitely don’t need to be pregnant, TTC or have something wrong to be seeing an OB-GYN. It is customary to visit one yearly, regardless.

What if she was watching a live video though? It could go on for quite some time without swiping.

Do they make drones that you can’t really see or hear? Or possibly ones that can get good imagery from a higher elevation than most average drones, therefore not able to be heard from the ground?

I would think the police would notice that if they cross checked by testing a current video to make sure the time was correct. But maybe they didn’t do that, idk.

Maybe he did see them? How do we know he didn’t?