04/22/2013 - waiting for rebuttal to continue

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
It truly is a war of attrition and I have always said their backup plan is to try to reduce the jury members to under 12. The longer they can keep throwing BS motions, then the longer there is a chance to have more jurors removed for any number of reasons like health, hardship, finding another juror misconduct, exhaustion, family emergency, etc. etc.


Old age....
 
I just read that scathing post by SusieD. And although I do respect your opinion, I respectfully disagree.
It is my belief, because of the 4th of July holiday those jurors wanted to GO HOME. Many of them were told by HHJP they would be home way before then. They knew if they found her guilty, it would mean another month or so with everything that goes along with finding someone guilty. Hearing victim statements, deciding her fate, etc. I truly believe that's why the jurors copped out. If they aren't careful, this jury may do the same.
MOO
 
JM filed an objection to DT surrebuttal request - arrrrrrghhhh would so like to read his objection

BIfqKHCCYAAj5uX.jpg:medium
 
Surrebuttal is only allowed if the state brings in new evidence during rebuttal. The defense cannot address their entire case all over again during surrebuttal but only the new evidence. Considering the new information we're hoping to see from JM I think the Judge will allow surrebuttal. It won't take long though. I don't think...

BBM. From your lips to god's ears!!
 
Every one I have chatted with agrees with that statement. I often felt HHJS was actually afraid to say NO to the DT! If she lets in the Dr., she is going to lose a lot of respect in her professional circle as well!

Just thought you guys would be interested to know that the JA supporters also hate the judge and thinks she biased towards the prosecution.

I believe this means she doin' her job right.
 
Sure, but he'd probably grind it up into the bologna first.

You know what's really sad? The doctors put you on a low sodium diet and all of a sudden you'd kill for a piece of bologna. With or without the added ingredient.
 
Just thought you guys would be interested to know that the JA supporters also hate the judge and thinks she biased towards the prosecution.

I believe this means she doin' her job right.

I'm with you, Lil' Buddy. I think she's doing a great job with a lousy situation.
 
You know what's really sad? The doctors put you on a low sodium diet and all of a sudden you'd kill for a piece of bologna. With or without the added ingredient.

Don't remind me. :)
 
I apologize in advance... Because I am way behind in reading... And this post may fall at an awkward place...

But this post by Bernina is so true!

Can the DT NOW bring in a Doctor that has not evaluated JA?

and.... How would JA even remember this was a crime of passion with her fognesia?

:banghead:

I'm way behind, too, so probably someone else has already commented. :floorlaugh:

Even if he hasn't already evaluated her, JM has several more witnesses I believe, who will also have to go through cross, jury questions, re-direct, re-cross . . . . This new guy will have plenty of time to talk to her, if the judge grants the motion, which I'm not convinced she will.
 
JA using likeness of TA's sister in her drawing?


BIfrY9PCAAAD7cW.jpg:medium
 
Yes, they do! They seem to attend the same conferences too. Some listed below..just googled Alyce and Geffner and there are pages, where both names are referenced together.

They probably tag team in custody cases. :furious:


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FAMILYCOURTREFORM/message/4033

http://www.inpea.net/images/IVAT2010_ConferenceBooklet.pdf

http://www.cvent.com/events/17th-in...stom-18-b1da4c68dd834500b75c020e5be82ba8.aspx

http://ivatcenters.org/conferences/17thIC/IVAT 17rth Conference Booklet-FINAL VERSION.pdf

http://www.davidprescott.net/2007_09IVAT.pdf

http://www.biscmi.org/documents/R2W_brochure.pdf

http://www.biscmi.org/other_resourc...brings that up if/when he questions this guy.
 
Who is that gal reading Jodi's journal on NG?

I want her to stop. Immediately. It's annoying.

Btw, how did Jodi afford to send 20 irises to Travis' grandmother? She was a brokey broke.

Don't tell me she used the money she took from Travis. I will vomit.
 
Just thought you guys would be interested to know that the JA supporters also hate the judge and thinks she biased towards the prosecution.

I believe this means she doin' her job right.

It's like a football game. By the end of the game the fans on both sides should be convinced the refs were in the tank for the other team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
2,534
Total visitors
2,607

Forum statistics

Threads
601,293
Messages
18,122,281
Members
230,996
Latest member
unnamedTV
Back
Top