ziggy
Active Member
I think the DP is back on the table because they have evidence now linking the disposal of the body and the Anthony home and none linking to an imaginary nanny. They also have solid evidence that the body was there for as long as 4 months by root growth and longer with decomp. time, pointing more toward an Anthony than a nanny from New York or stranger.
The prosecution can infer that the tape was there prior to death, but because they can't prove it, they probably won't go there and lose credibility with the jury. jmo. They will stick to the facts that are salient and point to no one other than KC.
The prosecution can infer that the tape was there prior to death, but because they can't prove it, they probably won't go there and lose credibility with the jury. jmo. They will stick to the facts that are salient and point to no one other than KC.