truckengirl
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 0
Way to go MN, Motion denied!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:woohoo:
Look in the docs released 9/29/09. There were two unidentified...one was the lab technician ...one was a partial (tape) and was assumed to be "unidentified"...at least then it was...not sure if somewhere else it later came out whose it was.Well its probably for another thread, but I disagree. Both pieces of Dna are not accounted for at all. IMO If you could provide a link to an official document that shows that both pieces are accounted for. I will gladly put this to rest. thanks
The point I think your missing though NTS is that TES, TM, and MN, were compliant with the courts order. The files were at MN's office for the defense to review as was directed by the court order. The defense failed to comply with that order. This current motion by the defense would hold greater weight if the defense actually showed up to review the files in accordance with the Judges order. I personally don't see where the defense provided enough of an argument to over turn the original order considering that the defense failed to follow that original order. In fact MN's office was nice enough to "hand deliver" the 32 files of searchers because the defense never picked them up.
The original order by the Judge was very clear. TES and it's representatives have complied fully with the order. The Defense has not. The defense was ordered to go review those files at MN's office and they didn't do so....period.
The defense did comply in my opinion. They sent in an proffessional company to look at the records. After all, the records are un organized. Furthermore, just based on what so many people say, Jb is not intellegent enough to handle this kind of job. Mn denied access. So there you have it. Moo
The defense did comply in my opinion. They sent in an proffessional company to look at the records. After all, the records are un organized. Furthermore, just based on what so many people say, Jb is not intellegent enough to handle this kind of job. Mn denied access. So there you have it. Moo
Orlando News Channel 13 just reported that JS has ruled that TES does not have to turn over it's records. No link yet, it just came over the wires.
I haven't had the time to catch up on this thread...promise I will later...but whatever happened with RK? Didn't he supposedly report in August that he thought he saw "something"? I'm confused by what the defense hopes to accomplish with this? First they seemed to want to discredit RK with JK's testimony and when that backlashed they veered in another direction? Are they saying that RK not only did the dastardly deed, but also moved the body when Casey was in jail so it would look like she didn't do it? Now, does this make any sense to anyone?
Where did this information come from? He sent in a professional company of "readers"? I'm confused.The defense did comply in my opinion. They sent in an proffessional company to look at the records. After all, the records are un organized. Furthermore, just based on what so many people say, Jb is not intellegent enough to handle this kind of job. Mn denied access. So there you have it. Moo
The defense did comply in my opinion. They sent in an proffessional company to look at the records. After all, the records are un organized. Furthermore, just based on what so many people say, Jb is not intellegent enough to handle this kind of job. Mn denied access. So there you have it. Moo
Tm said on Ng that it would be a cold day in **** before he would let the defense see any records. So I respectfully disagree. This is an all out war. They are not going to be reasonable. They may have to go to Texas, afterall thats where Le found Lb's records. Talk about a coincidence. This is not a law suit, this is a capital case and the truth needs to prevail here. The Judge can decide to hold the truth at bay here if he chooses, but it would only result in an appeal later on. Three cheers for the truth, lets get everything out on the table so we can all move on. IMO
No, they tried to send in a company to COPY the records. Ain't gonna happen based on the ruling that JS set forth.
Please tell me what is wrong with JB or his team in doing the job they were hired to do???? The company they were going to send in were going to (I repeat) COPY the documents. :banghead:
Running around in circles comes to mind..