There are so many interviews out and it's making my head spin but did anyone catch today's Oregonian that says they discovered TH's parents refinanced their home. So if that is the source of the payment to Houze, why wouldn't they have just said so from the beginning? Why make it into a court case? I'm baffled!
From the article: "On Friday, The Oregonian learned that Terri Horman's parents recently refinanced their home with a $165,450 mortgage, paying off the previous mortgage of $86,000. The deed of trust was filed Aug. 17 in Douglas County.
Neither Houze nor Terri Horman's parents could be reached for comment Friday about money"
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/kyron-horman.html
I saw that also, and wondered the same thing. Here were my thoughts: If Bunch were to say this in a motion, Rackner might come back and say "prove it." I think even if TH's attorney fees were paid for by her parents, Houze wants to stop all dialogue in court, whether thru motions or on the stand. Because if Terri starts answering SOME questions, not others. it won't take long to pin down those questions she is not willing to answer.