2011.01.03 - Motions Hearing

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Before you all wander off - what was that crack exactly HHJP made about the "Anthony Family" and witnesses or whatever it was?

Can anyone tell me please - there was so much going on I let it slide by me....
 
Did Judge Perry do a lot more "hand rubbing" during this hearing?
Too bad he didn't smack 1 or 2 lawyers over the head with his smoothed out palms.

Either Baez fails to mention stuff to Mason or Mason likes to play stupid and senile with the court.
 
Sometimes I get the feeling ICA has distanced herself to the point that she thinks she is on the defense team and they are defending some other person.

I think you've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly how she acts, IMO.
 
Just wow, I still cannot believe how unprofessional they were. I mean I think a stranger off the street could have done better. At least they would have probably said, Your Honor, if it pleases the court, I have no defense except to claim over burdened with the work load. LMAO even that wouldn't have been a good defense but better then what they gave!
 
Did Judge Perry do a lot more "hand rubbing" during this hearing?
Too bad he didn't smack 1 or 2 lawyers over the head with his smoothed out palms.

Either Baez fails to mention stuff to Mason or Mason likes to play stupid and senile with the court.

You are right and he sure was flipping that pen back and forth - plus rocking at the same time.
 
Beach-

It was my understanding the HHJP was going to let JB request a time if he got back to HHJP by Weds but he definitely was not going to go for 30 days. JB was suppose to contact his experts to find out which ones would have a hard time coming up with the reports requested and then have a reason why they needed more time (i.e. out of town, etc). At least that is what I understood.

IMO

That's how I understood it, too. I think the most JB will get is maybe two weeks.
 
Before you all wander off - what was that crack exactly HHJP made about the "Anthony Family" and witnesses or whatever it was?

Can anyone tell me please - there was so much going on I let it slide by me....

Are you talking about the witness Jackson? Some prisoner stated he had credible information for the defense in that it would prove ICA is innocent. He is well known and has done this in other cases too. CM stated He just wants a day out of jail. They all laughed because apparently he is known in the court.

However the Judge wanted I believe to be put on record so on appeal the Defense cannot try and use this in any sort of way.
 
Did Mason really just say he thinks everybody needs to calm down???

Yup..Mason does not want a "sanction" on his record before he retires..no way Jose...wait!! it will be Jose's fault if they get sanctioned...ahahahaha
 
Before you all wander off - what was that crack exactly HHJP made about the "Anthony Family" and witnesses or whatever it was?

Can anyone tell me please - there was so much going on I let it slide by me....

I believe it was related to the Anthony's being "agents of the state", in regards to the motion to suppress statements ICA made to LA, CA, GA, Maya & Robin. That motion was put off.
 
I believe it was related to the Anthony's being "agents of the state", in regards to the motion to suppress statements ICA made to LA, CA, GA, Maya & Robin. That motion was put off.

Please God tell me HHJP doesn't think the A's were EVER agents of the state...OMG...
 
Please God tell me HHJP doesn't think the A's were EVER agents of the state...OMG...

No, no, no that was what the defense wrote in their motion. I'm sure HHJP had a good laugh, it appeared that he knew/read these motions before the hearing.
 
I would like to say to Mr Mason
Since it seems you have a problem with the amount of time this case has consumed and that you have had to pay expenses out of pocket...
Remember. YOU! Mr Mason, voluntarily, after being asked by Baez, joined as a member of this defense team...no one put a gun to your head and made you be a member of Casey Anthony's defense team...No one Sir......so stop the whining..and here you said it would be fun...how fun has it been sir?
 
No, no, no that was what the defense wrote in their motion. I'm sure HHJP had a good laugh, it appeared that he knew/read these motions before the hearing.

Okay, thank you! Cheney had to have written that motion, or someone else who clearly hasn't followed this case. No wonder HHJP got a laugh. I'm surprised Cindy didn't stand up and say no way was she ever an agent of the state! That's so laughable it's almost not funny. Actually, it isn't funny after all the crap that the A's have put the state and this case through.
 
I believe it was related to the Anthony's being "agents of the state", in regards to the motion to suppress statements ICA made to LA, CA, GA, Maya & Robin. That motion was put off.

Yes, I think that HHJP referred to them as "police agents--the Anthony family," or something very close to that.

The only thing is I cannot remember (or rather, did not hear) in what context HHJP used this term.
 
As I see it, the only good point and/or advantage that came out of todays hearing for the defense is this:

They got to preview ICA's new look for the trial and will adjust upon review of the "bloggers" for future bi-monthly hearings.
 
If I were Judge Perry not one second past the seven days would be extended to Baez. He has had over 2 years and over $200,000.00 to do what needed to be done, plus court orders to do so, Baez has choosen to do whatever he wants when he wants and deserves much more then he got today.
How many of you think his experts have never written a report? It just dosen't even make sense to me. Color me stupid I guess.
 
court deemed for clarification what ea side would present

court has reviewed filed by defense "motion for clarification of experts" does not comply with this courts order

Court will find a willful violation of the courts order

Yippeee!! :great:
I just got to that part :great:
 
Yes, I think that HHJP referred to them as "police agents--the Anthony family," or something very close to that.

The only thing is I cannot remember (or rather, did not hear) in what context HHJP used this term.

I thought it was when they were going through the motions and trying to decide which were Frye, which required testimony and which could be ruled on just from the motions and responses to be filed.
 
You guys know what? I kind of have a feeling that after today, JB will be really pushing casey to plea. Here's why, and it's JMO: the bottom line is, Baez is lazy. This case has run its course for him to benefit from it, and there's nothing left in it for him except hard, hard, unpaid work on a losing case. He's milked the media already, and now the case has started personally costing him financially as well as professionally (sanctions, deposition travel, etc). Until today, he was just coasting past deadlines and work, but now he's been taken to task and I'm guessing he'd rather have casey plea guilty than put in the work that's required of him now.

I went to law school with a couple people like Baez, and they really sucked. Had one guy on my moot court team that coasted and put everything off until the last minute, didn't carry his weight, but carried a monogramed briefcase and wore his law school sweater almost everywhere so people would know he was in law school, and when push came to shove, he relied on us, his teammates, to give him notes and basically do his work for him. People like that will do almost anything to avoid actually getting down to work. They try to slip under the radar constantly. He eventually flunked out. I'm seeing a lot of this in Baez, and I'm guessing that now, more than EVER, he's going to be pushing casey to consider pleading guilty.

JMO of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
221
Total visitors
367

Forum statistics

Threads
608,929
Messages
18,247,737
Members
234,505
Latest member
sandra.gionest76
Back
Top