Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With the volume of images - over 108,000 - I suspect distribution, and I wouldn't be surprised if LE & the DA are suspecting the same.
According to the Texas Penal Code, if there are 6 or more identical images, that constitutes intent to distribute, and is a 2nd degree felony (whereas possession, I believe, is a 3rd degree felony), as well as possibly a federal crime if the images were distributed/transported across state lines. Since the internet is involved, it's more than likely transport across state lines occurred.
I think investigators will try to bring the maximum charges possible with regards to the *advertiser censored*. It's likely the FBI has been called in to assist with the investigation.
It's like if the DEA busts someone with a kilo of pot - that person can be charged with drug trafficking, especially if that person also possesses a scale & other paraphernalia. A kilo of pot is not for personal use, no matter how much of a pothead someone might be.
IMO, 108,000+ images of perverse illegal *advertiser censored* is NOT for personal use. Ugh.
In addition, I believe each image constitutes 1 count. When the number is tallied, there could be charges of 1,000s of counts of illegal *advertiser censored* possession and/or distribution (depending on how many of those images are child *advertiser censored*).
It goes without saying that child *advertiser censored* is one of the most vile, despicable crimes against humanity.
Yet, there sits Billie with her doe eyes, "in the dark", pretending to not know what all the outrage is about.
ITA, that amount of images equals distribution.
a poll........
http://poll.pollcode.com/PgW_result?v
Maybe the *advertiser censored* stuff was SA's "unemployment" possibilities......you know, a way to get back on his feet.
I've wondered that too. Are they images of adult women (18+) who look and are posed like physically mature teens, or posed like Lolitas? Or are we talking physically immature, pre-pubescent children? I think there's a difference between the two, in terms of deviance, and in terms of whether or not the *advertiser censored* has to do with HDs disappearance. If SA is into late-teen girls, then he's in a very large group of men out there (just look at all those 'college girls gone wild!' DVDs that I see advertised late night on cable, when I can't sleep! There is a reason that the guy who started the whole girls gone wild franchise is a very rich man). But if SA is into young children, and that is the type of child *advertiser censored* he has, then that is so many levels of deviant and wrong and disgusting, and is a completely different story.
IMO - the fact that he's got what they're terming "child *advertiser censored*", plus bestiality, and they're using the word "deviant", I'm going to guess that it is younger children he has *advertiser censored* of, and he's not just a guy who likes 17/18 year old, physically mature young women, KWIM? Just my guess though. Last night on NG, JC said that LE will not say what types of pictures these are, exactly.
So I guess that is my long winded way of saying, in answer to your question, tha we don't know yet what types of child *advertiser censored* they are, and LE isn't saying.
Hailey told Grandma that SA talked on the phone in the bathroom and lurked outside her bedroom door. If SA is into *advertiser censored*, making video's, etc. Have we considered that maybe he had a recording device set up in the home? Maybe in a bedroom or bathroom? I know it's distressing to think about, but maybe this is something LE has an indication of?
I wonder if this is one of the reasons that DD was removed from the home.
Hailey told Grandma that SA talked on the phone in the bathroom and lurked outside her bedroom door. If SA is into *advertiser censored*, making video's, etc. Have we considered that maybe he had a recording device set up in the home? Maybe in a bedroom or bathroom? I know it's distressing to think about, but maybe this is something LE has an indication of?