2011.04.15 Hearing Thread

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Baez now wants that photo of ICA with Tony thrown out.

WOW, Baez just said that this photo was taken after the "crime"

What crime - did Baez just say a crime was committed and that crime occurred before the fusion photos?

The SA's just caught the massive blunder as well. We now know where Baez is going. Oh boy, that was huge!
 
JB just said that photos taken at Fusian were at a time the 'crime was allegedly over'
wants them out
 
JB - The crime was over when these Fusian pictures were taken - so they are not relevant!

:eek: :eek:
 
these photos are different times of night doing different types of things. as such should be shown.

JB: the crime the SA is alleging is over at this point. it has nothing to do with this case. has no evidentuary value in this crime. these are nothing related to that or flight. if there was an item in here that was of evidentuary value that is one thing. but here the crime is over(that is THE point Jose, imo)

Who is that speaking, I do not know who that is? TIA. I cannot hear him.
 
Mr Edwards rebutting why photo of ICA and Tony should come in. First time I've heard him speak!
 
Lazarro picture again goes to state of mind after Caylee disappeared and before her precious body was found. Goes to how she's behaving and "looking" for Caylee.
 
Ummmmm JB....how can you assert that the crime was over? She hadn't been reported missing yet.
 
She could be looking for her daughter in the day and partying at nigh!! Objection of the photos denied.
 
JBP What date was photo taken

George "June 20", 2008

Casey indicated that during this timeframe she was looking for her daughter
 
JB saying that these pics have no evidence value...the crime is over at the time photos were taken.

FG saying that per KC she told LE that in this time period she was looking for her daughter.

HHJP: Photos are in!! hip hip hurray!!!
 
JB is saying "party photos" not relevant to the crime. If not, then WHY isn't ICA crying?????
 
Objection denied - party photos will be admitted if the state can establish a foundation before they admit it.
 
that photo was taken 6/20 @ fusion nite club while looking for her daughter. a distressed mother while looking for her child

HBP - objection to series of photos will be denied -
 
Big Trouble pic in, blue hoodie pic not in unless DT opens the door to discussion of her demeanor at OCSO in which case State can use it to rebut.

Isn't it the other way around? State was putting the photo in, JB was objecting, HHJP letting the photo in, JB can argue relevance at trial?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
1,858
Total visitors
1,999

Forum statistics

Threads
606,023
Messages
18,197,186
Members
233,711
Latest member
Trina2025
Back
Top