Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I so agree. I was thinking about how all these young people, the "shot girls", the room mates, have been thrown into this mess by ICA. What a waste of time for these young people to have to put their lives on hold for. IMO.
I don't believe they have, I think you're right...
eta: Well, wait-- they did hear about a stained trunk liner and a hair with a death band from the trunk...
Those "tricks" aren't coming from up his sleeve, if you know what I mean and I think you do.
TL thinks this was June 27th he was wearing a tie for the first couple of nights doing the promotions . . . stopped wearin them . . . pictures objections by DT overruled .. . publish
RESPECTFULLY SNIPPED JB wants to show statement to LE given 9/18/08. Bates stamp 1653.
i'm not seeing any basis for pressing TL on the "stench" in the car or getting close to it. The jury must be very confused, since the prosecutor hasn't gotten to that issue yet. We all know about that, but the jury hasn't heard it yet, have they?
Oh this little sidebar discussion is quite intense.
LOL, I think she's trying to look happy for TL. Trying to spark that flame. I'm thinking she's working with wet wood to say the least.
I think they will be within this time frame...maybe slightly over... they gave hhjp their schedulesWho thinks this trial will conclude at 8 weeks. Ha!
i hope the jurors notice that ica acts like she owns the place. It makes me so mad. I have never seen clients talking constantly to the attorneys, looking at the computers, grabbing the attorneys, shaking her head during testimony, hanging out with attorneys instead of immediately taken away. She talks to jb like they are peers. :maddening:
ut oh guys ... JA is now in the ring at the sidebar.
OH MY GOSH look how many attys are sitting at the defense table. That's horrible considering there are so few at the States table.
MSM tweets I read earlier said the jurors were getting frustrated with the side bars, rolling eyes, ect.
IIRC, she alluded to physical, or that he was a *advertiser censored* to her. She did not make a sexual abuse claim. I'm worried now that the jury will think it was and that's exactly why JB asked a question he knew might be objected to.
People bash JB for asking questions that are being objected to and sustained, as if he is being dumb, but he knows what he is doing. You have to understand that this is a technique lawyers use to plant info into the juror's heads.
\