Mountain_Kat
Heca Firimar !
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 13,966
- Reaction score
- 45,235
Yeah! John O'Hurley! Mr. Peterman! :floorlaugh:
Hmmm...wonder why she is there in Florida already...we are nowhere near the mitigation portion of the trial...could it be that she is there to visit KC and help the attorneys prepare KC for taking the stand?
Larroquette?
Just a heads up -
Nancy Grace is supposed to have special coverage of the case this evening beginning at 7 (and again at 10) pm ET.
:tyou: 21merc7 kay:
I needed to do that after recapping Jose/CM through out the voir dire and into the trial. For me, it is "beyond obvious" what they are doing. That is all they do. When people say the defense "made a good point" I admit I am at a total loss.
I am sure it is because some of it is over my head, but mostly all I hear is desperation and the crazy making. The truth is the truth. Facts are facts.
Jose is fighting a lost battle, imho. Maybe this type of tactic has worked before, oh I know it has worked before but in the words of my beloved Utada Hikaru "Nothing's like before."
The song does not have anything to do with this case, but it is a beautiful song. :luv:
YouTube - ‪~ Simple & Clean ~ Slow Version ~‬‏
Having at one time been married to a person who is almost exactly like Casey Anthony, I completely understand and recognize what she is doing when she speaks/lies. Be very sure of this; she is NOT insane or crazy. She is a manipulater and an accomplished bs artist. She will repeat back phrases & thoughts to the person who is questioning her as a way of directly answering a question but it also serves the purpose (in her mind) of giving that person what they want to hear. When they are fully backed into a corner they use a type of self efacing put- down to wiggle sideways away from being totaly nailed on thier lie. You can see this in her 911 call when she says "which was stupid" & at Universal when she says " I was reaching in a backwards way".
Something I never caught till yesterday was the way she was talking about why she wanted her private meeting only with her dad. I now feel THIS was when she began plotting to find a way to set him up.
Yeah! John O'Hurley! Mr. Peterman! :floorlaugh:
Jon Lovitz
I posted him as my "pick" a couple of days ago. I think we have a definite consensus going here.
i am a little worried right now - the sa isn't selling this well enough for me...i get lost in the details and carefully chosen words. I hope they come back with some laymen's explanations.
Death band = dead person's hair in trunk.
No death band on tape on duct tape = live person wearing duct tape.
Pleaseeeeee spell it out better sa !!
Maybe this was addressed in a prior post, but I am wondering why anyone would put duct tape on a 'dead' CA? Any thoughts on this? tia
Since we're on the subject of hair, does anyone know why in one of the first video's CA was asking ICA about when the last time she cut Caylee's hair was and when the last time was that she had cut or colored her own hair? :waitasec:
I thought PeeWee Herman, but we gotta "fatten" him up quite a bit. :floorlaugh:
Days ago I mentioned Chevy Chase as my pick for who plays JB in a TV movie. Especially his ridiculousness and how he acts in the Lampoon movies. Reminds me of JB.
CementPond I LOVE your siggie pics. Priceless! Would you consider adding one w/ the 'suicide' quote? Tee hee!
Hey! Nobody here wouldn't want to give me what I want would they? And if you would then isn't it true that you knew, you knew exactly what it was you were knowing? You did, can you just answer my question, you did-didn't you?
And, it was you-wasn't it who allowed that to happen? You are not very good at what you do, are you? You have failed in your responsibilities before, haven't you?
All that you follow and adhere to in your daily job is not correct, correct? When you are saying that someone is an expert you do not mean they should be listened to, correct? All of the methods you use to do your job are suspect, are they not?
And the science, well, (laughing so hard at you...so hard...) is not science at all. Is it Miss whoever...I am over here can you stop looking at the jury and tell me what I want to hear...tell me what I want this jury to hear and that is that nothing that you do is science. It is junk. Your job is junk. The people that do studies that you have been involved in do not know what they are doing, or you are just trying to state that to bolster your point.
That is what you want, isn't it? To bolster YOURSELF so you seem better? So that what you say is taken to have merit? You offer your opinions based on what? And you presume to offer those opinions even though you know, you KNOW it is based on nothing.
And, wouldn't you say that everything I am saying is correct?
:tyou: :winko:
LOL Thanks!
As for adding another with the quote, what exactly were ya thinking??