mombomb
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,437
- Reaction score
- -3
CSI Gerardo Bloise' next witness.
Direct Examination of Gerardo Bloise by LDB.
LDB asked him about the trash or garbage bag which he received from OCSO Awilda McBryde on Jule 16, 2008 at about 11:06pm. He took possession of it. He then removed the plastic bag from the paper bag and did a visual inspection of the items. He also photographed the item as he received it and opened it.
He identified a photo of the plastic bag with blue handles. This photo was marked as Exhibit 127 with no objection from JB. Photo puplished to the jury.
Exhibit 127 showed the paper bag and the plastic bag. You can see the contents, but through the plastic. There was a little wet in the area on the paper bag. It was his best recollection that it was a little wet. The mouth of the plastic bag was open.
After photographing, he started to inspect the contents of the plastic bag.
He was shown a photo of the contents of the plastic bag. He pulled the items out of the bag. This photo was marked as Exhibit 128with no objection from JB and it was published to the jury.
He did a visual inspection of the items and then put the items with the paper inside the dry room which is the room used to place wet items in order to get them dry. Some of the items in the bag were wet. Regarding the odor, it was the smell of normal trash and not the same smell as the car. The items remained in the dry room until he removed them on the 18th and placed them in a box and then put them in the evidence locker. When he removed them, they were dry.
He was shown another photo depicting a close up of some of the trash items - the napkins, Velveeta package. This photo was marked as Exhibit 129 with no objection from JB and was published to the Jury.
He identified the napkin in the photo.
He was shown another photo and identified it as the napkins he collected from the trash. He put them in a plastic bag prior to his inspection. The photo was marked as Exhibit 130 with no objection from JB and it was published to the Jury.
He eventually placed all the items in the bag on a table and photographed them. He was shown a photo depicting the items spread out, napkins, foil, dryer sheet, empty cig pack, part of detergent bottle. The photo was marked as Exhibit 131 with no objection from JB and it was published to the Jury.
He was shown another photo of items in the bag. This photo was marked as Exhibit 132 with no objection from JB and was published to the Jury. It showed dryer sheet, papers, foil, bottle of Crystal Lite and Cola, detergent and other items.
He was shown another photo of items in the bag. He agreed it was the items in the trash bag. Item marked as Exhibit 133 with no objection from JB and was published to the Jury. This photo showed the entire contents of the plastic bag.
He was shown another photo and identified it as a photo of a receipt from Fusion Lounge. It was inside the garbage. This photo was marked as Exhibit 134 with objection - relevance and 403, overruled - marked as Exhibit 134 and published to the jury.
He was shown another photo and identified is documentation from Full Sail. It was in the garbage. It was marked as Exhibit 135 with no objection from JB and published to the Jury.
He was shown a large box and identified it as the box he prepared to put the trash items in. Exhibit 126 was previously conditionally admitted. JB objected because the other witness has not testified to chain of custody. HHBP said he would wait until the other witness testified.
He was shown another box and identified is as the box containing the napkins he collected from the garbage. This box was marked as Exhibit 135 with no objection to JB.
LDB asked to introduce an envelope into evidence - no objection from JB. Item marked as Exhibit 137.
he inventoried the items in the white trash bag. LDB referred the witness to page 23 of his report. There were 37 items in the bag. He placed them all in separate envelopes in the box.
1- empty Coke can
2- empty Coke can
3- empty Milwalkee beer can
4- empty Sprite can
5- empty Copenhagen box
6- hair pin
7- 3 plastic tie wraps
8- empty Dr. Pepper can
9- empty Sprite can
10- empty Mt. Dew can
11- Oscar Meyer plastic container
12- Empty small Crystal Lite container
13- Empty Crystal Lite bottle with brown liquid inside
14- Bottle of Kiwi sport cleaner
15- Empty Bottle of Arm & Hammer
16- Crystal Lite soft drink mix
17- Empty black container
18- Empty pizza box
19- Empty carton of Cherry Coke
20- Velveeta with napkin attached
21- Carton of Velveeta
22- Velveeta
23- Empty package of Pal Mal lights
24- Empty package of Marlboro
25- Empty pack of Trident
26- 2 empty alum wraps of Velveeta
28- broken plastic hanger
27- Piece of fabric
29- Ful Sail
30- Receipts
31- Air freshener sheets
32- plastic wrap of garlic chicken
33- 3 small pieces of plastic wrap
34- small pieces of alum foil
All cans were empty. Laundry detergent was empty. Crystal lite bottle empty. Pizza box was empty. Velveeta package were empty. Garlic Chicken wrapper empty. Dryer sheets same as found in vehicle.
End of direct exam.
Direct Examination of Gerardo Bloise by LDB.
LDB asked him about the trash or garbage bag which he received from OCSO Awilda McBryde on Jule 16, 2008 at about 11:06pm. He took possession of it. He then removed the plastic bag from the paper bag and did a visual inspection of the items. He also photographed the item as he received it and opened it.
He identified a photo of the plastic bag with blue handles. This photo was marked as Exhibit 127 with no objection from JB. Photo puplished to the jury.
Exhibit 127 showed the paper bag and the plastic bag. You can see the contents, but through the plastic. There was a little wet in the area on the paper bag. It was his best recollection that it was a little wet. The mouth of the plastic bag was open.
After photographing, he started to inspect the contents of the plastic bag.
He was shown a photo of the contents of the plastic bag. He pulled the items out of the bag. This photo was marked as Exhibit 128with no objection from JB and it was published to the jury.
He did a visual inspection of the items and then put the items with the paper inside the dry room which is the room used to place wet items in order to get them dry. Some of the items in the bag were wet. Regarding the odor, it was the smell of normal trash and not the same smell as the car. The items remained in the dry room until he removed them on the 18th and placed them in a box and then put them in the evidence locker. When he removed them, they were dry.
He was shown another photo depicting a close up of some of the trash items - the napkins, Velveeta package. This photo was marked as Exhibit 129 with no objection from JB and was published to the Jury.
He identified the napkin in the photo.
He was shown another photo and identified it as the napkins he collected from the trash. He put them in a plastic bag prior to his inspection. The photo was marked as Exhibit 130 with no objection from JB and it was published to the Jury.
He eventually placed all the items in the bag on a table and photographed them. He was shown a photo depicting the items spread out, napkins, foil, dryer sheet, empty cig pack, part of detergent bottle. The photo was marked as Exhibit 131 with no objection from JB and it was published to the Jury.
He was shown another photo of items in the bag. This photo was marked as Exhibit 132 with no objection from JB and was published to the Jury. It showed dryer sheet, papers, foil, bottle of Crystal Lite and Cola, detergent and other items.
He was shown another photo of items in the bag. He agreed it was the items in the trash bag. Item marked as Exhibit 133 with no objection from JB and was published to the Jury. This photo showed the entire contents of the plastic bag.
He was shown another photo and identified it as a photo of a receipt from Fusion Lounge. It was inside the garbage. This photo was marked as Exhibit 134 with objection - relevance and 403, overruled - marked as Exhibit 134 and published to the jury.
He was shown another photo and identified is documentation from Full Sail. It was in the garbage. It was marked as Exhibit 135 with no objection from JB and published to the Jury.
He was shown a large box and identified it as the box he prepared to put the trash items in. Exhibit 126 was previously conditionally admitted. JB objected because the other witness has not testified to chain of custody. HHBP said he would wait until the other witness testified.
He was shown another box and identified is as the box containing the napkins he collected from the garbage. This box was marked as Exhibit 135 with no objection to JB.
LDB asked to introduce an envelope into evidence - no objection from JB. Item marked as Exhibit 137.
he inventoried the items in the white trash bag. LDB referred the witness to page 23 of his report. There were 37 items in the bag. He placed them all in separate envelopes in the box.
1- empty Coke can
2- empty Coke can
3- empty Milwalkee beer can
4- empty Sprite can
5- empty Copenhagen box
6- hair pin
7- 3 plastic tie wraps
8- empty Dr. Pepper can
9- empty Sprite can
10- empty Mt. Dew can
11- Oscar Meyer plastic container
12- Empty small Crystal Lite container
13- Empty Crystal Lite bottle with brown liquid inside
14- Bottle of Kiwi sport cleaner
15- Empty Bottle of Arm & Hammer
16- Crystal Lite soft drink mix
17- Empty black container
18- Empty pizza box
19- Empty carton of Cherry Coke
20- Velveeta with napkin attached
21- Carton of Velveeta
22- Velveeta
23- Empty package of Pal Mal lights
24- Empty package of Marlboro
25- Empty pack of Trident
26- 2 empty alum wraps of Velveeta
28- broken plastic hanger
27- Piece of fabric
29- Ful Sail
30- Receipts
31- Air freshener sheets
32- plastic wrap of garlic chicken
33- 3 small pieces of plastic wrap
34- small pieces of alum foil
All cans were empty. Laundry detergent was empty. Crystal lite bottle empty. Pizza box was empty. Velveeta package were empty. Garlic Chicken wrapper empty. Dryer sheets same as found in vehicle.
End of direct exam.
