So in conclusion, the DT wants us to know...
You can BELIEVE that the cadaver dog hits are credible, because there WAS a body in the back yard (about 5 yards closer to the pool, according to Jose). BUT the cadaver dog hit on the trunk...that was an error.
You can BELIEVE that observational and behavioral science proves PTSD causes people to do odd things, like party when their child is missing, but you can't believe the behavioral science studies/information about homicide vs accidental deaths.
You can believe that ICA is remorseful, because she is "crying" her eyes out in court, and ill, but PLEASE keep in mind that she doesn't process emotion, she just pushes it to the back and withdraws into a fantasy world.
Okay. Got it.