So, is this sidebar about the VT debacle perhaps?
I think JB is trying to poke holes in the boat - Bloise's exam was steering toward protocols and contamination and only focusing on ICA, but LDB put that right (and so did Bloise). I think it was more of a warm up with a friendly witness... IMHO
Did the DT have someone examine Caylee's body
See if I were a juror, that would not go towards reasonable doubt. It would go towards desperation. To me if that's all you have, unless you can prove actual tampering, it means you don't have anything. I would want to hear the explanation promised in the opening statement. I just don't understand people saying this could go toward reasonable doubt. It's NOT reasonable IMO.
Did the DT have someone examine Caylee's body
See if I were a juror, that would not go towards reasonable doubt. It would go towards desperation. To me if that's all you have, unless you can prove actual tampering, it means you don't have anything. I would want to hear the explanation promised in the opening statement. I just don't understand people saying this could go toward reasonable doubt. It's NOT reasonable IMO.
See if I were a juror, that would not go towards reasonable doubt. It would go towards desperation. To me if that's all you have, unless you can prove actual tampering, it means you don't have anything. I would want to hear the explanation promised in the opening statement. I just don't understand people saying this could go toward reasonable doubt. It's NOT reasonable IMO.
So JA asked where JB was going with the FBI witness... then sidebar... then in chambers. Wonder what is up?