HJBP:
JB: rfu for shovel
HS: x for female at 55 rfu's
JA: excluded from man but not identified as woman
HS: limited amount no conclusions
JB: not asking to id results - if reaches 50 threshold
JA: what relevance
JB: dna there, that's it, as far as, that's fair game, there was a portion of dna there not more
JA: to what end some later point argue (upset)
HJBP: mr. ashton calm down
JB:miss anthony borrowed the shovel
JA: concerned dt going to try to argue
HJBP: (to HS) results - what does those results mean
HS: at 50 rfu, at peak - no other info other than there is a peak
could be from female could be from male - no conclusion can be offered
HJBP: JA can address in cross
Jury returns
JB: can everyone hear me - recap, diff thresholds of dna present, something above 50 rfu, did not reach 200 level , fair statement something there, best way to summary what is isn't there
HS: not meet reporting critieria
JB: next report March 19, 2009 - (very jolly, flipping to new page on poster board)
SIDEBAR
HS: Q62 -64 , tape from medical examiners office
JB: talking about duct tape?
HS: yes Q62- 63- 64 - 1st exam top, swabbed for any bio material
JB: top side, non adhesive side
HS: yes, dna profile was generated but below threshold of fbi reporting policy