JA is making Dr. Spitz look like he's not at the top of his game--doesn't remember the book he edited and partially wrote, doesn't understand the question about the hole at the base of the skull.
Wow, I wonder how the jury is responding to the anger/defensiveness of this witness. JA is being very polite with him, not snarky. Of course maybe it is displaced anger, if in fact he wasn't provided with all the facts. Wow
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.