uklaw
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 785
- Reaction score
- 0
JA is going to take this witness's evidence apart piece by piece. Slowly and painfully.
Actually he isn't. But what he is doing is effective. Contrary to standard cross-examination practice he is asking open questions. Which seems to show how little Spitz knows about the non-medical aspects of this case.