BigFatMommyDog
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,932
- Reaction score
- -25
oh my gorsh - and the chemist the chemist the chemist. This man is deranged.
What is the point of this? I don't get what JB is trying to show.
Tink
I'm going to lend more credibility to a witness who catches and admits to making errors than one who does not.
Come on folks, this isn't that hard to see what he's doing, he's discrediting the lab and their findings.
Hey guys, sorry if this has been asked before, I'm popping in and out...
is Dr. Vass a chemist?
:crazy:
I disagree. JA was being very aggressive and condescending with Mr. Eichenbloom (sp?). The witness was coming across as very credible and cooperative and I believe JA came off as pompous, dismissive and disrespectful. It wasn't necessary, and made him seem at that point in time unprofessional. I wouldn't be surprised if during the cross examination of this particular witness if the jury took a dislike to JA. It certainly got my attention, and I was wondering what this witness was testifying to that could possibly be threatening to the state's case to provoke such an attitude from JA.
This is the most mind-numbing direct examination since the DNA lady was on the stand. Jose Baez must be trying to bore the jury to death.
LOL I actually snorted when he asked if Dr Vass was a chemist that time. I knew it was coming.