Sophie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,033
- Reaction score
- 106
I know this example has been discussed before. But read the autopsy of the vaginal injury, then read this from the search warrant:
Snip
Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she witnessed the autopsy of JonBenet Ramsey which was conducted by Dr. John Meyer on December 26, 1996. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she observed Dr. Meyer examine the vaginal area of the victim and heard him state that the victim had received an injury consistent with digital penetration of her vagina. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that Dr. Meyer told her that is was his opinion that the victim had been subjected to sexual contact.
Snip
From: http://www.acandyrose.com/crimescene-thebody.htm (PLEASE NOTE, THIS LINK CONTAINS AUTOPSY PHOTOGRAPHS).
And then IDI claim that we are making this up about Meyer's deliberate vagueness in the autopsy report.
Snip
Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she witnessed the autopsy of JonBenet Ramsey which was conducted by Dr. John Meyer on December 26, 1996. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she observed Dr. Meyer examine the vaginal area of the victim and heard him state that the victim had received an injury consistent with digital penetration of her vagina. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that Dr. Meyer told her that is was his opinion that the victim had been subjected to sexual contact.
Snip
From: http://www.acandyrose.com/crimescene-thebody.htm (PLEASE NOTE, THIS LINK CONTAINS AUTOPSY PHOTOGRAPHS).
And then IDI claim that we are making this up about Meyer's deliberate vagueness in the autopsy report.