Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #177

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the point is, the P hasn’t included the images extracted from Libby’s phone in the discovery, nor any reports related to the metadata that should be retrievable from her phone.

I’m not very techy so take that with a grain of salt :).
Thanks - you explained it very succinctly. Why didn’t they? Serious question: is their wording the legalese way of saying it? Cause it feels (to me) like they were talking in riddles.
 
I sure don't understand why. Had any of these "content creators" sought counsel they would not have contacted the judge.

These "content creators" - writing into the Judge - seem anxious to control a narrative that the Court really doesn't care about, along with an eagerness to insert themselves into a high-profile case.

IMO, shedding sunlight on the character, motives and objectives of those who the crime-scene-photo-leakers (RF, MRC) chose to disseminate crime scene photos works for Hennessey's strategy. So far, these unsolicited letters are doing Hennessey's work for him; each considers discrediting the defense as part of their role as a "content creator".

JMHO
Greeno is SOOOO trustworthy.... o_O:rolleyes:
#rap sheet from hell
 
New filings
03/12/2024Witness and/or Exhibit List Filed
ADDITIONAL LIST OF EXHIBITS FOR CONTEMPT HEARING
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Objection Filed
OBJECTION TO CHANGE OF VENUE
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL OF PROSECUTOR FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS THEREON
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
 
New filings
03/12/2024Witness and/or Exhibit List Filed
ADDITIONAL LIST OF EXHIBITS FOR CONTEMPT HEARING
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Objection Filed
OBJECTION TO CHANGE OF VENUE
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL OF PROSECUTOR FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS THEREON
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
I object. These belong to the night shift. Y’all take first crack day shift is over. XO Emma
 
New filings
03/12/2024Witness and/or Exhibit List Filed
ADDITIONAL LIST OF EXHIBITS FOR CONTEMPT HEARING
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Objection Filed
OBJECTION TO CHANGE OF VENUE
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL OF PROSECUTOR FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS THEREON
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
Objection to change of venue? I thought RA had asked for a change of venue and it was denied?
 
New filings
03/12/2024Witness and/or Exhibit List Filed
ADDITIONAL LIST OF EXHIBITS FOR CONTEMPT HEARING
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Objection Filed
OBJECTION TO CHANGE OF VENUE
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL OF PROSECUTOR FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS THEREON
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Petition Filed
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECUSAL FROM CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024
03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024

Sure doesn’t look like the defense is all that interested in a speedy trial.
Same old strategy from the defense. File something, fill it with misleading language to fire up the fans. Then the prosecution responds and it’s nothing.

03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024


I’m guessing the ancillary proceeding they want canceled is the contempt hearing next week. They are in it deep.
 
Sure doesn’t look like the defense is all that interested in a speedy trial.
Same old strategy from the defense. File something, fill it with misleading language to fire up the fans. Then the prosecution responds and it’s nothing.

03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024


I’m guessing the ancillary proceeding they want canceled is the contempt hearing next week. They are in it deep.
Based on Indiana law, what kind of charges do you think they will get if found guilty of contempt?
And the same goes for Nick?
 
Last edited:
Based on Indiana law, what kind of charges do you thing they will get if found guilty of contempt?
And the same goes for Nick?

I think it will just be fines. The SCOIN effectively removed dismissal as an option by reinstating them.
Did I miss something. I didn’t think NMcL had been charged with contempt.
 
I think it will just be fines. The SCOIN effectively removed dismissal as an option by reinstating them.
Did I miss something. I didn’t think NMcL had been charged with contempt.
He accessed motions that were ex parte and then shared that info in a filing. IMO if he isn't charged, then he should have been. I'm doubtful that the judge will see fit to do that, however.

I believe it will come up and he'll be in a quandary regarding innocent mistakes made by attorneys.
 
Hubs said he saw on the news the trial is starting in May. I was explaining how the judge and jury are coming from Allen Co. and wondering out loud if they will be bussed back and forth every day or put up in a hotel close to Delphi. I told him I wanna go to the hearing next Monday but I don't want to wait in line and what if I have to pee??!! He said I could come down to the building he is working on (they have real bathrooms and not port a johns!) and I said in a whiny voice "but I will lose my place in lllliiiiiiiinnnnnnnneeeeeeee!" He quietly said "oh yeah"
Remember the infamous “diaper” drive by the female astronaut who made the 14-hr drive from Houston to Orlando wearing a diaper so she wouldn’t have to stop for restroom breaks?
 
Sure doesn’t look like the defense is all that interested in a speedy trial.
Same old strategy from the defense. File something, fill it with misleading language to fire up the fans. Then the prosecution responds and it’s nothing.

03/12/2024Motion Filed
MOTION TO STAY ALL ANCILLARY PROCEEDINGS AND GET THIS CASE TO TRIAL
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
03/12/2024


I’m guessing the ancillary proceeding they want canceled is the contempt hearing next week. They are in it deep.
You guessed right about the contempt hearing being the ancillary proceeding they want cancelled.
One of their reasons: allegations are over a year old.
Crime scene photos leaks occurred 5 months ago.
 
Another interesting notation here in #38 caught my eye (last sentence, underlined by Defense):

None of the geo-tracked phones that were mapped match RA.

The geo-tracked phone owners also not associated with RA. jhmo

This may confirm my theory of the case.

RAs phone was not at the bridge that day. A huge problem for the defence IMO, and why they never mentioned this fact in the Franks, yet it is implicit in the text of the document.
 
IMO this collaborates 2 inferences from the Franks

1. RA's phone was not on the bridge checking stocks per his tip interview

2. RA's phone was not on the trails and leaving at 1.30pm

Where was RAs phone that day? What did he say in his pre-arrest interview about his phone?

Why did the defence not raise it in the Franks as exculpatory? Because it is incriminating?
 
He accessed motions that were ex parte and then shared that info in a filing. IMO if he isn't charged, then he should have been. I'm doubtful that the judge will see fit to do that, however.

I believe it will come up and he'll be in a quandary regarding innocent mistakes made by attorneys.

At least the prosecution immediately tried to make it right by withdrawing the request. They also explained in detail how the ex parte came to them.
Other than admitting they were the source of the crime scene photos leak, the defense has never admitted doing anything wrong, and never tried to make anything right.
Big differences about how things have been handled.
 
You guessed right about the contempt hearing being the ancillary proceeding they want cancelled.
One of their reasons: allegations are over a year old.
Crime scene photos leaks occurred 5 months ago.

That is just laughable.
They are in deep. That sucking noise you hear is the defense team realizing that the swamp they created is now pulling them down. They have no credibility and no goodwill because of their own behavior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
222
Guests online
278
Total visitors
500

Forum statistics

Threads
608,737
Messages
18,244,872
Members
234,436
Latest member
Justicesss
Back
Top