:seeya: Hey everyone, I'm also a little confused. :scared: (Can't find the 'confused' smiley ...)
1. Does a unanimous decision in favour of aggravating circumstances mean the DP is a sentencing option?
Yes, right?
2. Therefore 'Not guilty' of aggravating circumstances means the DP is not an option?
3. What happens if someone strictly opposed to the DP is called for jury duty or are all candidates screened? Or are all candidates just supposed to be pro-DP?
This last point only just occurred to me. For example, if someone is called to jury duty for a capital murder trial and opposed the DP, is there a danger they may find the defendant 'not guilty', because the sentencing could go against their personal moral beliefs.
TIA for any answers. I'm just not sure how it works. Was watching on FOX. Gosh!
PS : I'm sure you guys picked this up but in the interview that she gave after the verdict, she repeatedly referred to the DP as 'freedom' (at least 3 times). I guess this was a ploy to get the jury NOT to give her the DP, right, as she reckoned no-one wanted to see her 'free'. This is something else that's only just occurred to me. *slowly catches up*