Bulldog 23: As you should also have 100% of all other members support for your position.
"Argument"? Care to explain.
"..with no context", ...upset.." Bulldog23, these are truths and facts that have been accessible over the past nineteen years at various times, and at some point relatives have either in parts or wholes have been cognizant of same; dependent upon one's decision to dedicate themselves to this case history is of their own choosing, some have been expertise in this case since its tragedy, actual Sleuths, young/old black/white men/women although fewer over the years.
"Upset", anyone wearing their feelings on their sleeves when involving others now striving to bring closure to the useless murdering of these two young girls should be ashamed; how dare they feel now have any right of being upset when after nineteen years two children's bodies lay in rot in their graves while their murders and those complicit enjoy life?
"Lead us somewhere". Yes, to the factual truths, and along the way hopefully someone, as Ms. Roberts had commented will come forward, opening the flood gates of revelations. Good management skills is ever mindful of six letters PPPPPP; like the phone number, you want to know find out; same was decided before becoming member recently after having established a methodology in exercising this particular protocol for presentation reviewing of timeline; to which thus far progress has been significantly made.
"...WW/JC.... disaster..." Care to explain?
And finally, again, almost all relatively either in parts and/or wholes are already privy to all of "context" you refer to; just requires some time to seek out, or otherwise make your own inquiry; for example, Officer Roskam, commonly known he worked A.M. 8-1-99, media reports quotes Ozark Police Lieutenant Rex Tipton as saying...…. Making logical to rationalize if really wanted to know, locate Tipton, and ask about Roskam, seems fair enough, right?