maggieo
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 438
- Reaction score
- 68
This is a horrific story. And while I believe every adult in that household is equally responsible for whatever happened to the children, I'm having a hard time with the father's version of events. He "allowed" a *blind* person to carry out these complicated torture scenarios?? "What, honey? You want me to find the duct tape? Because you want to torture the children? Sure, I'll get it. I'll get the scissors so you can cut it, too. Oh, the broom's out in the garage, hold on a minute..."
I think it's most likely the other way around: she "allowed" him to do these things. they were probably both completely strung out, too. But I see no reason to believe his story -- the more likely version being that the non-blind person had somewhat more control over the situation.
Though both of them should receive the maximum penalty, and *anyone* who witnessed the abuse without doing anything should get jail time. Honestly, I think people would think twice about looking the other way if their fannies were on the line, too.
I think it's most likely the other way around: she "allowed" him to do these things. they were probably both completely strung out, too. But I see no reason to believe his story -- the more likely version being that the non-blind person had somewhat more control over the situation.
Though both of them should receive the maximum penalty, and *anyone* who witnessed the abuse without doing anything should get jail time. Honestly, I think people would think twice about looking the other way if their fannies were on the line, too.