I wrote
here that there is at least on substantive error in the spreadsheet WSers are using to analyze phone records. It turns out the error is actually in the cell phone summary material
LE included in the latest document dump. To be fair, what LE released is not evidence - it is a work-in-progress investigative summation. Errors are easy to make - and we can do our best to find them and help them clean them up before trial. Dot the i's and cross the t's, if you will.
What is the error? On page 2577 of the latest document dump they identify two afternoon calls to number *advertiser censored*-*advertiser censored*-7965 as Andy F. We had previously thought this was Matt C. This was critical to us in establishing a time line for the Crane's Landing visit.
Seeing this in the document dump started to unravel a lot of theories about that day.
However, in the same document at page 2565 we see a dump of KC's cell phone address book, and clear as day is Matt C. with the 7965 number. In fact, these pages could go a long way in clearing up confusion about which numbers belong to whom.
Going back to page 2577, this and the surrounding pages indicate they
summarize incoming and outgoing calls only for June 15 through June - and for the most part they do. However, an occasional text message is included. At first I wondered why - were the specific texts somehow critical to the investigation?
Looking carefully at the text details - time and phone number - I have determined that these text records are not part of the original cell phone records released in September. This means
LE has updated records with possibly more information.
For example, a text to Sean H. on June 19 is new to the mix and confirms our assumption that KC stopped by his place right around 6 PM.
Can't wait to see those new records.