I think that CA has pegged in her head that Casey may get the Death Sentence. So, even if they may know what happened. They really cant say either because they know dont know how much of it to believe.
Not taking up for the A's. But I dont think they have any involvement in Caylees Murder.
I think as Parents they want to try and protect their own daughter. YES!!
But I still think at the same time, they do want justice for Caylee.
**Let me throw out a Question to other WEBSLEUTHERS
?? WHAT would you do if you were in there shoes, if your grandaughter was murder and your daughter was the only suspect.
Me, I would mad as crap because she keeps spinning all these lies, I would take her and try and tell her she has to tell the truth, the lies in the end will hurt her worse. If she is protecting someone else then she needs to come clean.
If she did do it and it was accidental then her getting the Death Penalty would be less likely, but if she did do something to harm the child. THEN WHY!!
I think there are a lot of people here speculating on what they would do given the same circumstance. I believe the vast majority of people here would be trying to save their daughters skin. IIRC, even NG said she would be trying everything she could to keep her child out of prison.
I believe they are saddened but are desperately trying to stop from losing their daughter too. I think they blame themselves for some or all of this due to parenting mistakes they have made in the past and therefore don't want to see their daughter put away for life or get the DP.
The family seeks to protect their image yet they fail to realize that by them telling the truth would bring about some dignity.
.
If a lot of the speculation on this board is correct then they have zero dignity to preserve. If GA or LA are the father of Caylee. If LA or the GP's were involved in the cover up. If KC did this to get back at her mother for something then all dignity is gone from an outsiders perspective.
I really do think they will be truthful. What have they got to lose? And their "image" is in need of desperate repair.
I voted "not sure" because I feel they would figure out some lies before the inquiry and tell just enough truth to work around them.
I don't get it.Dunno where I read today that they might be questioned again soon.What does this full immunity thing mean then?If they don't get it they will lie?This is ridiculous.LE can use this against them,why are they risking?Or is this just bad atty strategy?
Their attorney will be there during questioning and won't allow them to answer any questions. If they are given immunity then they'll talk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doCwxzNM98E
As mush as I dislike the family, this is a good. It brought tears to my eyes. Maybe immunity is okay.
I could write three books about OJ Simpson. One would make him look like one of the best people to ever grace this planet and the other the worst person to grace this planet and the other in between.
When a video is made with heart wrenching pictures and a heart wrenching song you could feel for a lot of criminals in this world. Just sayin.
I haven't seen anyting that they are claiming "the nanny did it." Is there a credible source--did their attorney say this?
I don't think since the body has been found that they are claiming the nanny did it they are just being tight lipped now. They had an appearance scheduled on LKL for the day after the body was found that had been scheduled before the discovery and they dropped out on the advice of their attorney. :waitasec: That says a lot.
FOX News, national just did a piece on this immunity business.
A former Prosecutor chimed in and used the word despicable
several times! He said in all of his years in law he has never seen Grandparents NOT want to tell the truth regarding their murdered grandchild.
I wonder if in all his years in law he's ever seen a grandchild murdered by their mother?
The immunity would also guarantee that the money train never stops.:furious:
IS THERE A LAWYER IN THE HOUSE?
It keeps being discussed that immunity would allow the GP's to profit from any things associated with this case they are involved in for profit and no immunity and a conviction for OJ would keep them from profiting.
Some say that's true and others don't believe it's true can a lawyer settle this for us please?
Wonder where we would be today if the parent's had called a stop to this right from the first.... you know - stop the lying, just stop it, where is Caylee, etc. It has just gone on too long and I still do not understand why LE can't break her. It has just gone on too long. MOO
KC has learned how to lie very well in the 22 years she's been on the planet. IMO, this is usually due to parents that are very tight fisted with their kids and don't allow them any freedom.
In high school the best liar of all my friends was the friend with the strictest parents.
I agree that this thing has been handled stupidly by the Anthony's from day 31 but I really think they didn't want to believe their daughter was capable of a crime like this and kept deluding themselves.
KC has a lot of anger in her. Where did that come from? If she was being molested and her mother kept blowing her off because it would cause scandal in the family or because she just didn't believe her (I'd think this would be before she became pathological) then I believe she would harbor a lot of rage against her mother especially if her mother knew Caylee was the product of incest.
This would help explain the "maybe because I'm a vindictive " statement.
and because they have a dead grandaughter we are to let them skate on by---irregardless of the damage they have done to others...loved your post--!seems like poor little Caylee only comes to forfront when they need her to--other than that...its there own agenda first....
I think that's the way it's been up until Caylees death and after it too.
I'm hopeing the same---I also hope that something along the lines of the Goldmans when oj was doing that book thing....
If she's convicted who would bring the civil suit?
(Respectfully snipped and bolded by me.)
I agree that the A's should not be allowed to profit from book, magazine, film deals, etc., however, the time for preventing that is RIGHT NOW, not later. By the time a book, film, magazine article, or whatever is released, the A's will have already received their money in full, in the form of a non-repayable contractual advance.
Boycotting the finished product won't effect the A's income; it will only severely reduce the profits of whatever publisher, network, etc. paid the A's for the rights to the produce the finished product.
The only way to block the A's from making a great deal of money from selling (licensing) those rights, is to start making it publicly clear, right now, to potential publishers, networks, etc., that you--we, everyone--will boycott the finished products.
In the world of publishing, film-making, etc., that translates to, "you don't have a prayer of making a profit."
And profit-making is the only thing they're concerned with (understandably). Depending upon the amount of boycott warnings they receive, they will either decide not to sign a contract with the A's at all, or they will radically reduce the amount of the $ advances they offer.
That's a good idea but impractical. There are so many people that would want this book lines would be out the door IMO.
So caylee's finally found, then news reports of possibility fingerprints could still be on duct tape. then the house is searched again, and they suddenly want full immunity. and lee gets a lawyer.
what if they were granted immunity for testimony, but it turned out they had a hand in moving the body? would that immunity protect them from ever being charged for that?
sorry if this has been asked before, there's so many pages of threads to read through!
I believe they would be given limited immunity. I've never heard of a case where significant crimes have been given immunity from prosecution.
Personally, I think LE doesn't need any testimony from them to get a conviction for KC or to be able to all of them for OJ. JMO
[