Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh it was this little fella
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-Jassiah-Clark-4-Baton-Rouge-20-December-2014
..haven't seen more info on the 'hole'...just seeing it reminded me of the hole pic I saw....nosing around some more on it
gah made me think of old wells that haven't been filled in properly...you just never know
can any one local answer?
Is heading east on 165, right there at that Mack's place, heading toward England, then turning and heading NW on up it to 440 the way most Stuttgart area folks would head to Little Rock/other side of river?
thanks
Since NAMUS requires dental records, etc., they would have had to go through JC or LE to get the info. Same for all 'facts', I would assume. Final word on clothing is on those two resources. If NAMUS posts the clothing we have to trust it is correct, retrieved from the two sources.I remember someone posted about a car accident but no one knew for sure??
I honestly dont see these questions as nitpicking-I was hoping that we had more info on where those changes came from. IIRC, when some of our newer folks came on board they were looking for some people with experience to help them work through this case, given that no one was a family member. If JC enters information into NAMUS that is misinformation, it is her bad and on her. If she (for example only) convinces someone else to enter this information into NAMUS, the responsibility for that information becomes less clear. IMO only. If LE enters the information, it is on them. I cant speak for anyone else, but if I enter info into NAMUS for a case I have been working on as an advocate, I have spoken to LE long before when I introduced myself at the beginning of my involvement. And I talk to them before I do it. Because who knows what their agenda is or the angles they are working but them?
I am not an advocate in this case, and when I contacted SPD as I posted a while ago it was because a tip was communicated to me. Just to be clear.
Since NAMUS requires dental records, etc., they would have had to go through JC or LE to get the info. Same for all 'facts', I would assume. Final word on clothing is on those two resources. If NAMUS posts the clothing we have to trust it is correct, retrieved from the two sources.
yep believe, he got slapped harder for the theft of whatever x 2, than the being on the premises of where ever....it may have absolutely nothing to do WITH Cassie....but sure wish it was known
ps...yes there can be sinkholes in Arkansas
http://www.geology.ar.gov/geohazards/sinkholes.htm
the pic of what I saw did not appear to be manmade, because you could see enough into the opening to see how it widened out down inside
Well that was a lot of catching up to do. My apologies for being gone. A week ago today I lost my mom suddenly & am still working on putting my head back into order. I'm glad to see so much discussion is still happening here for Cassie.
Believe09-a few pages back you mention me &twitter. I did post a few things to a reporter but didn't get much response other than they had already talked to JC.
http://www.madillrecord.net/90499/1828/headline-news
Looks like some TX journalist has made mention of Cassie being missing. Thanks to all who have reached out to reporters in hopes of garnering more coverage for Cassie.
The description of her clothing came from JC directly... when i spoke to her at the search. It is the most factual any information is going to get since no one knows who really saw her last. It could very well be the exact clothing she left in or she could be found in a kimono where someone abducted her and redressed her and then killed her (and it wouldnt match anyone's description). There are no videos, no photos, and no witnesses. Local LE is taking JC's word on everything even though she is considered a suspect. That makes absolutely no sense to me. Obviously LE or her own mother/family hadnt cared enough to put her in NAMUS so does that mean that no one should care enough to do it since the players who are ordinarily responsible for these processes havent? I am confused.Honestly, I dont believe this to be true. It definitely wasnt true in the case of Bob Harrod. I guess it comes down to your personal belief regarding the integrity of the information that has been provided regarding what Cassie looked like when she disappeared, what she had with her and what she was wearing. There has been a tremendous amount of skepticism expressed here regarding the ever changing story. I personally believe it is a mistake to assume that it is now considered to be verified information when we still do not know the source of it. Especially since it has been entered by a 3rd party out of the goodness of her heart.
I strongly urge everyone to take some time to read the guidelines regarding case entry into NAMUS if you arent familiar with them. At the end of the day, just because a civilian non case player can enter the information doesnt mean that they should.
I respect everyone's opinions, differing or otherwise. This just happens to be mine.
JC
The description of her clothing came from JC directly... when i spoke to her at the search. It is the most factual any information is going to get since no one knows who really saw her last. It could very well be the exact clothing she left in or she could be found in a kimono where someone abducted her and redressed her and then killed her (and it wouldnt match anyone's description). There are no videos, no photos, and no witnesses. Local LE is taking JC's word on everything even though she is considered a suspect. That makes absolutely no sense to me. Obviously LE or her own mother/family hadnt cared enough to put her in NAMUS so does that mean that no one should care enough to do it since the players who are ordinarily responsible for these processes havent? I am confused.