The enormity of the evidence showing that JA killed TA is incontrovertible.
I suggest familiarizing yourself with the evidence.
Absolutely the bloody palm print was matched to her and blood at the scene was DNA matched to her.
Pictures of JA were on the camera - the date matching the pics of the murder.
The only way the evidence could be more damning is if the murder was videotaped by a third party.
If you watch the trial and interrogation tapes JA initially denies ever being in Mesa - this is the first day of her arrest.
The second day of arrest JA tells police intruders did it.
Two years later, after many different lawyers quitting her case, including herself giving self-representation a go, she says she did it, but it was self defense.
She has never admitted it was 1st degree premeditated murder. There is plenty of evidence to support premeditation, go look it up.
(color emphasis by me to illustrate a point).
<modsnip>
I offered some of these topics of evidence to think about because I noticed on this thread that there was a change in the wind. I noticed some of the posters have started to sympathize with JA.
There IS overwhelming evidence that she was THERE. There is NOT overwhelming evidence that
SHE murdered TA. (There simply IS NOT OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that she murdered him). If there was, all her lies wouldn't have mattered.
<modsnip>
She claims there were intruders, did they take the photos?
She has openly admitted to being a liar. I watched the video.
She admits to Juan that she lies right on down the line.
The point I'm trying to make here just for the sake of a good, open discussion is that if she's LYING about everything then, couldn't she also be LYING about killing him?
Or, are her lies only considered lies whey they can be used to support whatever verdict you are trying to get across?
Here's an example: A lie that says TA was a pedophile.
Doesn't fit into the character assassination of JA so THIS? This is a lie.
Example #2: A lie that JA murdered TA.
THIS? This would mean she's guilty so let's accept this lie as a fact.
Example 3# Two intruders murdered TA.
Maybe? Maybe there were two intruders. Maybe they took the photos. MAYBE, maybe, maybe, maybe.
It's a big fat MAYBE because in the big wide world of LYING and testimony you are currently unable to weed out which lies are TRUE and which lies are well, LIES.
Maybe, given the propensity for turning men into sensless sexually depraved hounds, JA had also been messing with the brains of the roommates?
All of these things haven't been investigated to the satisfaction of my curiosity. Something's missing here.